dashrendar44 Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Gal Gadot is (still) a bad actress. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Futurist Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 10 hours ago, dashrendar44 said: Gal Gadot is (still) a bad actress. Yup. Nice smile though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 7 minutes ago, The Futurist said: Nice smile though. When you job is being photographed a lot, it make her a really good one in some ways for some roles imo (when we are talking about that ridiculous high level of nice smile). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vc2002 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 On 2017/9/25 at 11:30 PM, dashrendar44 said: Gal Gadot is (still) a bad actress. As bad as the guy plays the new Superman (forgot his name) Although I'm not sure if it's really unpopular. I dont see Gal gets a lot of praise for her acting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dashrendar44 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, vc2002 said: As bad as the guy plays the new Superman (forgot his name) Although I'm not sure if it's really unpopular. I dont see Gal gets a lot of praise for her acting. According to the trades, she might be in the running to snatch an Academy Award nomination for her performance. Edited September 27, 2017 by dashrendar44 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZattMurdock Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 On 29/03/2016 at 4:01 PM, Kalo said: Michael Bay is a better filmmaker than Zack Snyder. This isn't an unpopular opinion. It's actually the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZattMurdock Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 On 25/09/2017 at 0:30 PM, dashrendar44 said: Gal Gadot is (still) a bad actress. Gal is our new Christopher Reeve. I don't think she is necessarily a GREAT actress now, but I wouldn't be mad if she was nominated. What I mean is that maybe her future can be brighter than Reeve if she focus on TRULY becoming a great actress. Don't think your opinion is unpopular either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZattMurdock Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 On 25/09/2017 at 10:47 AM, titanic2187 said: get out and dunkirk are overrated Get Out is overrated as hell. And yeah, this is an unpopular opinion. It's a great film, but it's not even better than Logan, and Logan isn't the superhero masterpiece that some make out to be. Here's my unpopular opinion, btw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalo Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 23 minutes ago, iJackSparrow said: Get Out is overrated as hell. And yeah, this is an unpopular opinion. It's a great film, but it's not even better than Logan, and Logan isn't the superhero masterpiece that some make out to be. Here's my unpopular opinion, btw. I loved Logan, but I think it might be my least favorite SH film of the year, of course that's mostly becuase most of them exceeded my expectations this year. I actually gave every one of them (GOTG 2, WW, Logan and Spider-Man: HC) the exact same grade and have trouble deciding where to rank them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZattMurdock Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 5 minutes ago, Kalo said: I loved Logan, but I think it might be my least favorite SH film of the year, of course that's mostly becuase most of them exceeded my expectations this year. I actually gave every one of them (GOTG 2, WW, Logan and Spider-Man: HC) the exact same grade and have trouble deciding where to rank them. That's LITERALLY my opinion on the film. I think it's the perfect endsong for the Singer universe. But I think that literally all the superhero films this year are more accomplished films. I just don't see Logan like a masterpiece, more like a 3.5/5 film. Deadpool for example is a 4.5/5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vc2002 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 1 hour ago, dashrendar44 said: According to the trades, she might be in the course to snatch an Academy Award nomination for her performance. Come to think of it, Gal really reminds me of Scarlett. Yeah one can say she's DC's Scarlett. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vc2002 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 1 hour ago, Kalo said: I loved Logan, but I think it might be my least favorite SH film of the year, of course that's mostly becuase most of them exceeded my expectations this year. I actually gave every one of them (GOTG 2, WW, Logan and Spider-Man: HC) the exact same grade and have trouble deciding where to rank them. I'm not sure if this is unpopular but IMO Singer's first two X-men movies are much better than Logan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 the whole mortality aspect of Logan was interesting but the rest of the plot was pretty uninteresting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dashrendar44 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, iJackSparrow said: Gal is our new Christopher Reeve. I don't think she is necessarily a GREAT actress now, but I wouldn't be mad if she was nominated. What I mean is that maybe her future can be brighter than Reeve if she focus on TRULY becoming a great actress. Don't think your opinion is unpopular either. She wasn't even on the level of Chris Evans in CA1 or Hemsworth in Thor, imo, none of them had any preposterous Oscar talk or were award worthy (Christopher Reeve either and he was better than all of them). The only thing I sense in common with Reeve is that she will always be associated to that specific role and typecasted in these popcorn fares unless she enrolls at Julliard School (Didn't help Reeve for getting recognition outside Superman though) or Actors Studio asap to gain more complex and realistic roles. It's a sincere case of low expectations since everybody feared awfulness, hitting an average to mediocre acting level that is the minimum basic requirement as a lead in any other movies is seen as the epitome of the-spian greatness.(She can hit her marks frowning AND smiling AND crying, yeah, Oscar worthy!) She's a Keanu Reeves in Matrix (acting limitations working in service of the material) more than a Christopher Reeve acting-wise.(Deploying an acting range to embody a dual character). (And Jenkins direction and Chris Pine's comedic chops were doing a lot of the leg work for her to bounce off it. I enjoy the movie for what it is, a light summer popcorn fare following a typical run-of-the-mill CBM blueprint but the hyperbole surrounding every single thing about it, geez...) Edited September 27, 2017 by dashrendar44 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalo Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 1 hour ago, vc2002 said: I'm not sure if this is unpopular but IMO Singer's first two X-men movies are much better than Logan. Eh I'm not sure, DOFP is the only X-Men film I like better than Logan I think, but X-Men and X2 are very close and both brilliant films imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalo Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 50 minutes ago, dashrendar44 said: She wasn't even on the level of Chris Evans in CA1 or Hemsworth in Thor, imo, none of them had any preposterous Oscar talk or were award worthy (Christopher Reeve either and he was better than all of them). The only thing I sense in common with Reeve is that she will always be associated to that specific role and typecasted in these popcorn fares unless she enrolls at Julliard School (Didn't help Reeve for getting recognition outside Superman though) or Actors Studio asap to gain more complex and realistic roles. It's a sincere case of low expectations since everybody feared awfulness, hitting an average to mediocre acting level that is the minimum basic requirement as a lead in any other movies is seen as the epitome of the-spian greatness.(She can hit her marks frowning AND smiling AND crying, yeah, Oscar worthy!) She's a Keanu Reeves in Matrix (acting limitations working in service of the material) more than a Christopher Reeve acting-wise.(Deploying an acting range to embody a dual character). (And Jenkins direction and Chris Pine's comedic chops were doing a lot of the leg work for her to bounce off it. I enjoy the movie for what it is, a light summer popcorn fare following a typical run-of-the-mill CBM blueprint but the hyperbole surrounding every single thing about it, geez...) While I agree I don't think Gal gave an Oscar worthy performance, she was very good in WW imo. by far the best acting role of her career. and Yes alot of that has to do with Patty Jenkins great direction and her Chemistry with Pine, but come on give the girl bone. She is insanely charismatic in that movie and has real talent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Rambo Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Wonder Woman and Spiderman Homecoming are the most overrated SH movies this year. Overrated in terms of Content and Commercial appeal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiccup23 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Valerian was one of the best films of 2017. Beauty and the Beast while decent, was very much overrated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnack Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 14 hours ago, dashrendar44 said: She's a Keanu Reeves in Matrix I think we underrate what he did in this, he is working perfectly under is limitation but he also transform quite well (at least physically) between is video game avatar / weak human self, lot of good work went into this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) 14 hours ago, dashrendar44 said: She wasn't even on the level of Chris Evans in CA1 or Hemsworth in Thor, imo, none of them had any preposterous Oscar talk or were award worthy (Christopher Reeve either and he was better than all of them). The only thing I sense in common with Reeve is that she will always be associated to that specific role and typecasted in these popcorn fares unless she enrolls at Julliard School (Didn't help Reeve for getting recognition outside Superman though) or Actors Studio asap to gain more complex and realistic roles. It's a sincere case of low expectations since everybody feared awfulness, hitting an average to mediocre acting level that is the minimum basic requirement as a lead in any other movies is seen as the epitome of the-spian greatness.(She can hit her marks frowning AND smiling AND crying, yeah, Oscar worthy!) She's a Keanu Reeves in Matrix (acting limitations working in service of the material) more than a Christopher Reeve acting-wise.(Deploying an acting range to embody a dual character). (And Jenkins direction and Chris Pine's comedic chops were doing a lot of the leg work for her to bounce off it. I enjoy the movie for what it is, a light summer popcorn fare following a typical run-of-the-mill CBM blueprint but the hyperbole surrounding every single thing about it, geez...) it did feel like Chris Pine almost felt like a co lead. Kind of ironic for the first major female superhero movie. The sequel will kind of have a hole to fill without him Edited September 27, 2017 by John Marston Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
