AniNate Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 (edited) I think he's already there. His films may not age well but he'll always be remembered as one of the definitive filmmakers of the aughts decade and hopefully beyond. Edited July 22, 2012 by tribefan695 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zlazer Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 I think he's already there. His films may not age well but he'll always be remembered as one of the definitive filmmakers of the aughts decade and hopefully beyond.Prestige not age well, memento not age well, inception not age well even insomnia, i could agree will following, begins and dark knight (aint seen tdkr yet so cannot comment) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackO Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 With six critically acclaimed movies under his belt, is it too early to list (not rank) among the greatest directors? I don't think so. By 1989, when Spielberg was the same age as Nolan (42) is now, we knew that he would be a legend. Same for Kubrick, Scorcese, and Coppolla. Nolan has impeccable filmmaking skills and a fantastic range. What do you think?Does he need more movies under his belt? Does he need more timeless classics to qualify (2001, ET, Godfather)?Yes, I think it is t early to rank or list Nolan among the greats. He is close to breaking out huge but needs a few more movies before joining the elite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusader Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 While Spielberg's form dropped of recently this guy directed Schindler's List, E.T., Raiders of the Lost Arc and Close Encounters of The Third Kind Marty directed Goodfellas,Raging Bull, Taxi Driver, Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, Last Temptation of Christ and Hugo ( damn idk about you but I got a hard on after this sentence ) There's no need to mention Kubrick's versatility as it already has been Now, I love Nolan but he really needs to branch out with the same level of quality of his movies in order to be considered 'great' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilmac Posted July 24, 2012 Author Share Posted July 24, 2012 (edited) Fishnets made the point that Hitchcock never really branched out. Correct me if I'm wrong but before Departed and Hugo neither did Scorcese (at least great movies outside of his main gangster genre, i don't think alice and last temptation were great).InceptionPrestigeMementoBatman BeginsDark KnightDark Knight RisesThose are six Nolan movies in the IMDB Top 250 so he must be a legend! Edited July 24, 2012 by lilmac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cochofles Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 I don't think you have to branch out and get out of your comfort zone to be a legend. Would anyone argue against Woody Allen being an iconic filmmaker, even though he always does basically the same film? He has recently changed the scenery, sure, but it's always the lives and loves of neurotic white people with a big city backdrop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishstick Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 (edited) I don't think you have to branch out and get out of your comfort zone to be a legend. Would anyone argue against Woody Allen being an iconic filmmaker, even though he always does basically the same film? He has recently changed the scenery, sure, but it's always the lives and loves of neurotic white people with a big city backdrop. Agreed. Those who are legends are really REALLY good in their zone. And considering that there are many others who are alright in many zones but never really REALLY good in any, that`s something. There`s no need for QT to start making non-QT movies (like some wanted Django to be) when he`s exceptionally good at making QT movies. Edited July 24, 2012 by fishnets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eXtacy Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 He is a very monotone director. ALL his films feel very similar to each other. If he can show he can do other film types that are good then yes I will concede him being among great directors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AniNate Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 (edited) I'm not sure I want him to do that. I like the tone of his films. They're mechanical and composed yet lively and beautiful at the same time. No one has been able to walk that kind of tightrope like Nolan has. Edited July 24, 2012 by tribefan695 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrylos 7 Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 So Hitchcock is not one of the greats because he didn`t make a family movie? Just because a director isn`t a genre crossover it doesn`t make him less great.Hitchcock is not just "one of the greats", Hitchcock was a God amongst men , when it comes to movie- making .(just wanted to get that off my chest )Anyway Nolan is NOT among the all time greats . Inception was a pretentious mess, Insomnia was good but a remake and the original was better , Memento was awful and his batman series is good but not that good to elevate him to "among the all time greats" status . "The prestige" is his best movie , IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozymandias Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Not at all IMO. The Dark Knight is his only great film IMO. The rest aren't necessarily bad, but very forgettable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vc2002 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I sense soon people will be asking is Joss Whedon among the greats too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squaremaster316 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Well, according to critical reviews and audience reception, he seems to be 8 for 8 as far as films are concerned.Side note: I'm sure Paul Thomas Anderson will be 6 for 6 after this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrylos 7 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Well, according to critical reviews and audience reception, he seems to be 8 for 8 as far as films are concerned.Side note: I'm sure Paul Thomas Anderson will be 6 for 6 after this year.If the audience reception was that great he would have had more hit movies other than the batman series and maybe inception (even though it did average for such a hyped movie) . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squaremaster316 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 If the audience reception was that great he would have had more hit movies other than the batman series and maybe inception (even though it did average for such a hyped movie) .800M+ worldwide with no franchise, no popular novel, no 3D and a concept considered complex and original. I'd say it was a big hit.Are you saying Paul Thomas Anderson isn't well liked because TWWB was his only profitable film? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Prince Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I don't think he is for one reason, all he's great movies have the same basic backbone. Think of Memento, Inception and The Prestige. When you think of the real great Directors, they have done an array of acclaimed and successful movies. Nolan has ways to go, but he's certainly on his way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfirebird2008 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I don't think he is for one reason, all he's great movies have the same basic backbone. Think of Memento, Inception and The Prestige.When you think of the real great Directors, they have done an array of acclaimed and successful movies. Nolan has ways to go, but he's certainly on his way.I agree with this. Needs more variety in his work before we can truly say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopher Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I don't think you have to branch out and get out of your comfort zone to be a legend. Would anyone argue against Woody Allen being an iconic filmmaker, even though he always does basically the same film? He has recently changed the scenery, sure, but it's always the lives and loves of neurotic white people with a big city backdrop.Except Woody has made a movie every single year since 1969. A lot of them have been pretty good. He's obviously of the most accomplished writer/directors of the medium. I agree that Nolan isn't yet but he could be on his way. I'd love to see him balance big and small movies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bballman24 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Agree with most of you guys.We'll know in a few years time when he releases more films (albeit if he branches out)... but looks very very promising for sure. Hopefully he can also do a bond film in between Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Bacon Posted July 29, 2012 Share Posted July 29, 2012 Nah, he needs some more movies on the level of The Prestige. I need to catch up with some of the greats whose material was before my time, but I definitely wouldn't put him with Fincher or Tarantino, who are my favorites at the moment. I'd put him at the level of JC or a little higher at the moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...