The Warner Bros. Thread | Will NOT merge with Paramount...capitalism is still terrible

[WittyUsername]

Just now, John Marston said:

 

He didn’t really deny anything. Fact is some of these actors/franchises are done 

He specifically said that some of the stuff in the article is “not true.” He just didn’t specify which parts. 

[John Marston]

 

[SnokesLegs]

Both images that James Gunn has shared recently have prominently featured Superman, so at the very least I’d imagine the character has a future with them. Whether that’s with Cavill is another matter, but I feel like Superman could be a major part of what they’re planning.

[Ozymandias]

49 minutes ago, belblazer said:

If I had to guess, I would say that the reboot + recast is half-true.

 

A soft reboot like they said about The Suicide Squad. Some actors (Gal, Momoa, Margot and maybe others) will stay because they agreed and others won't (Ben, Cavill and Ezra etc).

 

Thats still pretty much a hard reboot.

 

Axing The Flash is now the final piece of the puzzle.   Please Zaslav, do the needful.

[ChipDerby]

50 minutes ago, John Marston said:

 

 

Ahh yes the ever trustworthy 700 follower account with 1 like and no actual source. Thank you for this.

[cookie]

5 minutes ago, ChipDerby said:

 

Ahh yes the ever trustworthy 700 follower account with 1 like and no actual source. Thank you for this.

Not sure why he didn't just quote the Deadline article that line came from.

 

Quote

Deadline has confirmed that they’ve put the kibosh on Patty Jenkins’ treatment for Wonder Woman 3. The filmmaker was expected to hand in a screenplay, we understand, and instead the new bosses got pieces of paper that just weren’t suitable.

 

https://deadline.com/2022/12/wonder-woman-3-patty-jenkins-gal-gadot-james-gunn-peter-safran-1235192829/

[Macleod]

"We're not going to make every single person happy..."  -- Gunn

 

https://variety.com/2022/film/news/james-gunn-dc-studios-cancelation-wonder-woman-man-of-steel-1235454396/

[Maggie]

Is James Gunn a mole from Marvel sent to ruin DC? These decisions don't make sense

[WittyUsername]

If we define “soft-reboot” as them keeping certain actors from the Snyderverse, without following up on Zack Snyder’s plans, then I would’ve assumed that was already a given. 
 

By the way, going by Gunn’s tweet, I’m assuming the part of the article that he and Peter Safran are currently undecided on is whether or not Henry Cavill is getting a new solo movie. That always seemed up in the air. 

[cax16]

6 minutes ago, Maggie said:

Is James Gunn a mole from Marvel sent to ruin DC? These decisions don't make sense

What decisions? Cause the only thing we know right now is Wonder Woman 3 isn’t happening in its current incarnation, maybe they have her write another script that fits into their plans. We have no idea what’s happening yet. 

[ChipDerby]

46 minutes ago, Maggie said:

Is James Gunn a mole from Marvel sent to ruin DC? These decisions don't make sense

 

WHAT DECISIONS lmao, literally NOTHING has even ACTUALLY happened yet

[GOGODanca]

https://deadline.com/2022/12/wonder-woman-3-patty-jenkins-james-gunn-responds-dc-1235193576/

 

"However, we’re hearing that Jenkins was given the chance to take another stab at a Wonder Woman 3 treatment after receiving notes from all Warner Bros. motion picture brass (it wasn’t just Gunn and Safran’s decision). There were concerns about character arcs and payoffs, and the threequel emulating similar structural problems ala Wonder Woman 1984. She decided to take her toys and go home. The studio would like to do another Wonder Woman, however, the question is will Gal Gadot do it sans Jenkins."

[cax16]

13 minutes ago, GOGODanca said:

https://deadline.com/2022/12/wonder-woman-3-patty-jenkins-james-gunn-responds-dc-1235193576/

 

"However, we’re hearing that Jenkins was given the chance to take another stab at a Wonder Woman 3 treatment after receiving notes from all Warner Bros. motion picture brass (it wasn’t just Gunn and Safran’s decision). There were concerns about character arcs and payoffs, and the threequel emulating similar structural problems ala Wonder Woman 1984. She decided to take her toys and go home. The studio would like to do another Wonder Woman, however, the question is will Gal Gadot do it sans Jenkins."

Well that answers that about Jenkins. 
 

I think Gadot would do another movie without Jenkins. We’ll see what happens. 

Edited December 8, 2022 by cax16

[AJG]

NEW EXPOSÉ BITCH!!!!!
 

 

 

[GOGODanca]

4 minutes ago, AJG said:

NEW EXPOSÉ BITCH!!!!!
 

 

 

The Rock one hundred percent is the editor for the article

[AJG]

5 minutes ago, GOGODanca said:

The Rock one hundred percent is the editor for the article

I’m getting Trump flashbacks over Deadline’s clearly sponsored coverage for this movie. This is sad

Quote

And Black Adam 2? It’s been radio silence from Warner Bros. to the pic’s team about whether there is a sequel to the Johnson led franchise. However Warner brass and Johnson are elated that the pic stands to make a profit north of $50M despite false media reports. Warners would be keen to keep an asset like Johnson with a half billion social media followers in the fold, the People’s Champion having made several hit movies with New Line including San Andreas, Rampage, and Journey to the Center of the Earth.

 

[robertman2]

1 hour ago, GOGODanca said:

https://deadline.com/2022/12/wonder-woman-3-patty-jenkins-james-gunn-responds-dc-1235193576/

 

"However, we’re hearing that Jenkins was given the chance to take another stab at a Wonder Woman 3 treatment after receiving notes from all Warner Bros. motion picture brass (it wasn’t just Gunn and Safran’s decision). There were concerns about character arcs and payoffs, and the threequel emulating similar structural problems ala Wonder Woman 1984. She decided to take her toys and go home. The studio would like to do another Wonder Woman, however, the question is will Gal Gadot do it sans Jenkins."

Jenkins got critized once and basically died lol

[cax16]

This is interesting,

 

“

On the other hand, we hear that WME-repped Flash director Andy Muschietti and Indiana Jones director James Mangold are excited to do business with the Gunn-Safran led studio. 

”

[TestPattern]

The business side of Hollywood is so much more interesting than 98% of the movies released these days

[dudalb]

6 hours ago, WittyUsername said:

It really does seem to defy all logic that they would just do a full reboot. A soft reboot is one thing, but starting over from scratch with completely different actors? That comes off like wishful thinking from people who just want to erase all traces of the Snyderverse. 

After reading all the material I could find on this, only thing we know for sure is that Gunn and Safre have rejected Jenkins' script for WW3. Everything else is speculation.