Olive Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 1. Spider-man 2 - 9.2/102. Spider-man - 8.5/103. The Amazing Spider-man 8.0/104. Spider-man 3 - 7.2/10I enjoyed all of them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 SM2SM1SM3TASM 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Accursed Arachnid!™ Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 1. Spider-Man 2 A+ 2. The Amazing Spider-Man A 3. Spider-Man A 4. Spider-Man 3 B- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 ASM - ASM2 - ASM1 - B-SM3 - D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceroll Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 SM2SMSM3TASM 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Accursed Arachnid!™ Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 It's beyond my understanding how anyone could think TASM was worse than SM3. I mean if I had to pick a film just for its sincerity, it would be TASM over SM3, let alone the narrative problems SM3 has or the obvious soap opera quality love "triangle"(rectangle?). I guess you could fault TASM for trying too hard or not trying hard enough, but at least they tried. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but I have a hard time understanding this. If it's because it had the origin again, that opinion is based on personal preference, or possibly taking offense, but it has nothing to do with quality or you could say the same for any remake. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stingray Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 SM - 7/10SM2 - 8/10SM3 - 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MovieGuyKyle17 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Spider-Man 2Spider-Man 1Spider-Man 3Amazing Spider-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victoriastone14 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 1. Spider-man 2 - 9.5/102. Spider-man - 9/103. The Amazing Spider-man 7/104. Spider-man 3 8/10 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAR Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Spider-Man 2 ASpider-Man A-Amazing Spider-Man BSpider-Man 3 C+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 I mean if I had to pick a film just for its sincerity, it would be TASM over SM3, let alone the narrative problems SM3 has or the obvious soap opera quality love "triangle"(rectangle?).Are you serious? The one thing the Raimi films have over ASM is "sincerity". SM3 has tremendous problems, but it's never boring. I'd watch SM3 again over ASM just for the "Dark Peter" sequence, which has some LIFE to it. There was passion behind it. Also, we're gonna pretend ASM doesn't have narrative problems? Jeez. Am I being too hard on ASM because it retells the origin? I'm not gonna say that's not a part of it. We just saw the exact same story ten years ago in a hugely popular movie, and you choose to spend 2 hours and 15 minutes telling it at all over again in a less compelling fashion? I think it's a project that was flawed from the conceptual stage. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 I enjoy Spider-Man 1,2 and Amazing Spider-Man all equally. Spider-Man 3 though is without a doubt the worst 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Are you serious? The one thing the Raimi films have over ASM is "sincerity". SM3 has tremendous problems, but it's never boring. I'd watch SM3 again over ASM just for the "Dark Peter" sequence, which has some LIFE to it. There was passion behind it. Also, we're gonna pretend ASM doesn't have narrative problems? Jeez.Am I being too hard on ASM because it retells the origin? I'm not gonna say that's not a part of it. We just saw the exact same story ten years ago in a hugely popular movie, and you choose to spend 2 hours and 15 minutes telling it at all over again in a less compelling fashion? I think it's a project that was flawed from the conceptual stage.Passion? No, Total lack of care by the director? Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceroll Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 It's beyond my understanding how anyone could think TASM was worse than SM3. I mean if I had to pick a film just for its sincerity, it would be TASM over SM3, let alone the narrative problems SM3 has or the obvious soap opera quality love "triangle"(rectangle?). I guess you could fault TASM for trying too hard or not trying hard enough, but at least they tried. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but I have a hard time understanding this. If it's because it had the origin again, that opinion is based on personal preference, or possibly taking offense, but it has nothing to do with quality or you could say the same for any remake.Because SM3 was actually fun, whereas TASM tried too hard to be fun and quirky and failed. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Accursed Arachnid!™ Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Because SM3 was actually fun, whereas TASM tried too hard to be fun and quirky and failed.Well, IMO it succeeded in that aspect. While I agree that some of the Dark Peter parts are not as bad as some say, SM3 took the worst parts of the first two films then expanded that to 2.5 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceroll Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 I thought Sandman was a pretty epic character and I liked the battle between Spider-Man, Vemon and Sandman. But I was like 15 when I watched it so maybe my standards were lower 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichWS Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Passion? No, Total lack of care by the director? YesI think Webb was in over his head and having friction with the studio. I'm a bit surprised he's back for the second film. I hope it goes more smoothly for their sakes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Accursed Arachnid!™ Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 I think Webb was in over his head and having friction with the studio. I'm a bit surprised he's back for the second film. I hope it goes more smoothly for their sakes.I hope Webb improves as well, but I would be perfectly happy with a similar effort sans the shackles of having to retell the origin. By default, it would be better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessie Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 I watched SM1 the other night and I must say, it is quite bad. TASM is the better product IMO, it doesn't matter if they practically remade it, as long as it improved on it (which it did) then remake away. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omario Posted November 22, 2012 Share Posted November 22, 2012 (edited) spiderman 2amazing spidermanspiderman 1 spiderman 3 Edited November 22, 2012 by Omario 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...