A Marvel Fanboy Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 Most Hollywood blockbusters (especially superhero movies) wont age well. Probably unwatchable in 10 years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goffe Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 X2, X1, SM2 and HULK still looks good today 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hangman Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 X2, X1, SM2 and HULK still looks good today I used to love SM2, but the special effects look horrible now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goffe Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 some shots yes, but overal the films still looks very good 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim22 Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 Rambo 3 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 ^ LOOOOOL (pretty safe wording, though) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 (edited) The majority of films from 2000-2009 are gonna looked dated in awhile from all that insipid digital color grading. Edited September 24, 2013 by Telemachos 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impact Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 The majority of films from 2000-2009 are gonna looked dated in awhile from all that insipid digital color grading. With that in mind-just about every film from the 1970s-quite a few of them have that "70's look" where they are faded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 I don't have any problem with a film looking its time. In fact I like that. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impact Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 Prisoners-out just for 1 weekend and it already seems dated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impact Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 (edited) Of course just about every sci-fi from the 1960s with how they thought the future be (Back to the Future 2 was having fun with that-they knew there be no flying cars and stuff) Ace Ventura seems dated. Beverly Hillbillies has a VERY outdated joke that is amusing, here I will explain it: There is a scene in the high school where every teen picks up a cell phone. Why is this a joke? At the time only rich kids would of had cell phones. Edit: There is another very dated joke that was outdated within months of the release-where a cameo by Zsa Zsa Gabor they mention she was in a drive by...slapping. (She slapped a cop that was in the news in 1993-I didn't get the joke either until I was told why it was funny) Edited September 24, 2013 by Impact Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordmandeep Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 It depends some films can look dated but still have that classic feel so it is something you don't notice. Like Those old Biblican Epics and Lawrence of Arabia and Godfather. If something is truly great it becomes timeless. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinHood26 Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Star Wars Attack of the Clones. Its almost unwatchable today, first movie ever shot digitally. the medium has grown so much its like comparing N64 graphics to PS3. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goffe Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Frankly, I didn't notice that much of a difference, it's dated compared to TPM cause it had more special effects instead of pratical effects, not because it was shot on film or in digital Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinHood26 Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 it's dated compared to TPM cause it had more special effects instead of pratical effects, not because it was shot on film or in digital Its a combo of both, I mean look at ROTS 3 years later it looks light years ahead of AOTC. With that said im a HUGE film advocate, and I think film ages much much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainJackSparrow Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 The first Paranormal Activity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kvikk Lunsj Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Attack of the Clones looks terrible today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementeleus Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 The problem with many digital movies in the last decade is that you can't really remaster them down the road. They are what they are. They look nice now, but 10-15-20 years from when we're all watching 8k (or whatever) movies, they'll still be 2K with no way upwards (there are a few that shot and finished in 4k, but those are few and far between). Meanwhile, a movie like NORTH BY NORTHWEST -- 60+ years old but shot in 65mm VistaVision -- can be rescanned and remastered and look as good as anything made today. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinHood26 Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 Meanwhile, a movie like NORTH BY NORTHWEST -- 60+ years old but shot in 65mm VistaVision -- can be rescanned and remastered and look as good as anything made today. This! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainJackSparrow Posted October 14, 2013 Share Posted October 14, 2013 The Muppet Movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
