Jump to content

newknicksfan

Free Account+
  • Posts

    887
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by newknicksfan

  1. 8 minutes ago, harlequinade said:

    Joaquin and DiCaprio all have similar range imho, And frankly, lately, they both do similar things in all of their roles. Pitt showed range this year, and not for the first time.

    Both great at what they do, but they do tend to leans towards certain things a lot that they excel at imo. Joaquin is the master at playing weird/unstable guys, Leo always brings his 110% intense yelling effort game (idk what to call it lol).  

  2. 12 minutes ago, filmlover said:

    Bale had already established himself as a very good actor long before playing Batman (American Psycho, anyone?) so it's hardly a surprise he's had a terrific post-comic book movie career. It'll be surprising if he doesn't win a second Oscar someday (a Lead one most likely).

    Bale was the lead actor in a Steven Spielberg epic and garnered universal acclaim for his performance back in 1987! That's crazy lol Though he did have a very under the radar 90s output. 

    • Like 2
  3. 56 minutes ago, lorddemaxus said:

    It's gonna be hard. Director is too competitive and so is Actor (especially since Disney is pushing both of Damon and Bale for lead). Sound nominations are guaranteed but I don't see much else happening.

    Bale is incredibly well liked in the industry, his film is very well liked/well reviewed and has come out later than some other contenders.  He can easily get nominated in lead. 

  4. 1 hour ago, LonePirate said:

    The Cinemascore for Ford v. Ferrari is going to be very high as it is a crowd pleaser of maximum order. I will be very surprised if it is not at least A and an A+ would not be a surprise at all. This film is going to have some tremendous legs over the next few weeks.

    My crowd ate this shit up.  Wasn't even a packed theater and there was tons of audible laughter

  5. 20 hours ago, dudalb said:

    Death Proof was pretty much an action film, the horror elements were defiantly secondary.

    And the first 40 Minutes of the film are the worst thing a film can be: Boring.

    I love the way the Tarantino fanboys actually defend the film being boring.

    But then if you start with the premise that a director is incapable of messing up, you end up defending a lot of stupid shit.

    I'd consider it Horror/thriller.  But yes, it was boring for a good stretch of it

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.