Clifford41B
-
Posts
11 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by Clifford41B
-
-
How long until they move it to September 24th because of the attendants spoiling the mid-credits?
-
I have only found three-four legit reviews, it seems the movie is just okay, it sure is not getting rave reviews. Makes you wonder why Sony didn't even try making the first one okay.
Also, i wonder if this inspires enough confidence for Sony to lift the embargo earlier.
-
3 minutes ago, AJG said:
people know that fans search for early reactions around these times and make fake tweets.
It’s a bit of fun.
Yeah, same thing happened with Shang Chi.
-
That's still 90 minutes without credits, same lenght as the previous one.
-
19 minutes ago, xiazhi said:
Venom should have bigger fanbase than Shang Chi, who was unknown to many.
I hope people can stop using trailer views to predict success after this.
I'm waiting for the inevitable "Venom 2 Eyes $90M DOM" article from Deadline.
-
3 minutes ago, narniadis said:
Theres a difference between fast and tight and Broadcast TV movie length.... of which this is only 5 minutes longer than. Hoping for decent but not expecting it.
The first movie didn't benefit from having a short lenght either.
-
According to Fandango and AMC the runtime is 1 hour 30 minutes. If this is true it's considerably shorter than the previous one, which clocked at 1 hour 58 minutes.
-
1
-
-
Well, it's good that they're sticking to their guns.
-
So much for fawning over Free Guy's success.
** VENOM SPOILERS THREAD**
in Box Office Discussion
Posted
Honestly, i feel this one was (somehow) weaker than the first one: Pretty much 2/3 of the movie is just Venom and Eddie bickering and repeating the same joke about them acting like a married couple over and over again while Cletus does whatever. The idea of making it 90 minutes so it can get to the action would have made sense if there actually was any action besides Carnage killing fodder.