![](http://content.invisioncic.com/r255924/set_resources_71/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
ilikemunster
-
Posts
157 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by ilikemunster
-
-
Well most people said that for the avengers. People also said that when Spider-Man 3 broke the weekend record. These days you can't really predict what will break the weekend record and what won't. For all we know Star Wars might underperform...I doubt it but avengers 2 "underperformed" and I wouldn't have expected that in a million years.Batman V. Superman will break whatever the record is when it opens. That record will last a while though.
Actually, it might last until the next Jurassic Park film unless I am totally missing something.
If THE FORCE AWAKENS is well received and the following film is released in summer, that would have a strong chance.
-
This is just the most shocking box office run for me. i guess franchise revivals are now the "new" superhero movie.
-
-
Hey, give Liam Hemsworth some credit, he plays the character with amazing accuracy. Gale's every bit as interesting as a block of wood in the books too.
And yeah, there's really not much of a "triangle" in the books or movies. If you don't know who she romantically loves and who she loves in a brotherly sense by now you haven't paid attention at all.
Yesssssss......
-
7
-
-
♫ ♪ At Laaaassssstt ♫ ♪
-
3
-
-
every other superhero movie is hailed as revolutionary lol
...By their very own fanboys, right?....just like Hunger Games might be seen as revolutionary by its own fans
-
3
-
-
there is barely a love triangle! peeta and gale aren't even at odds with each other fighting over katniss at ANY point. katniss just likes them both at different times in like 2-minute scenes, and a big deal is not made out of it. meanwhile, people stereotype the series as another twilight, because it stars a girl and has a female fanbase.
Just like people stereotype superhero films as being similar because it has men in costumes saving people?
-
1
-
-
a couple pages ago i said that sexism against the thg series is saying it's for "dumb teen girls" and then this is posted
and you guys still try to pretend i'm wrong? a series about survival, governmental oppression through the media, and human condition, all commenting on our society with more poignancy than any overrated book from 50 years ago that you had to read in english class, and it gets reduced to that kind of quote because it targets girls instead of guys for once. the bias is very transparent.
Actually, I'm a hunger games fan....but nice try.
By the way, what I am saying is fact. The MAIN demographic for Hunger Games are teenage girls (at least it was at the beginning) and these type of plot devices (love triangles) appeal to teenage girls. I felt like the love triangle was forced but I completely understand why Suzanne Collins did it. I would to if it gave me a better chance at becoming a bestselling author and a multi-millionaire by the next year. Its not biased to state the obvious...you're acting like teenage girls don't eat this stuff up, they do. And us men love superheroes and watching shit explode...maybe thats our stereotype but (in GENERAL) most men do like that kind of stuff. Whats the big deal?
-
1
-
-
The problem is two-fold: firstly, he's completely uninteresting, secondly, the stories keep insisting that there's some sort of deep passionate connection between them, when there isn't. Why bother with the love triangle to begin with? Why should Katniss even be burdened with either of them? Why does she have to choose between a glorified extra or a talking 2x4?
Why?
Possibly to sell books to gullible teenage girls that are dying to be in a fanbase where their most interesting conversations revolves around statments such as "OMG!!! Totally TEAM PEETA!" or "I totally ship Katniss and Gale! xoxoxox".
If you make a story with lots of twist and turns, write it in first person, and put a CW-esque love triangle in there...you are almost garunteed to become a multi-millionaire. And thats exactly what Suzanne Collins did. Smart thinking on her part
-
1
-
-
Is he more pointless than...
Dr Mann
Nolan was so subtle with that name. Almost as subtle as Avatar's unobtainium.
-
2
-
-
I feel like everything you say these days is sexist.
"I like your dress"
"You're sexist!!!!"
"Your dress is ugly"
"You're sexist!!!!!"
-
The rap music injected into the trailer might be a way of trying to get Black audiences to come out and see this. Spike Lee has said numerous times that Black audiences usually don't come out to see serious/dramatic films starring African-Americans. Even mainstream stuff like The Great Debaters or Get on Up flops, but they see shoot em ups and gangsta movies in high numbers. Most of the people who went to see The Help or The Butler or 42 were White people.
-
This logic. lol.
Lionsgate will still make bank off of this.
Off of ALLEGIENT? Hmmm.....we'll see lol.
-
Lionsgate will be FORCED to cancel Allegient Part 2's release when Part 1 FLOPS horribly.
LMAO! I would be in tears.....boxoffice Gods please make it happen!
At least The Hobbit trilogy gave each film a different name. So lots of people didn't know it was really a part 1, part 2, and part 3. OTOH, breaking 1 book into 3 parts is really trying to milk people of their money no matter how many different titles you give the films.
The Hobbit is really the worse culprit. I mean, three? really? I am a huge fan of the LOTR trilogy and didn't bother watch any of The Hobbit films. I'd rather keep my positive memories of the LOTR movies and The Hobbit book intact, thanks
-
1
-
-
Studio will still be laughing al the way to the bank
With one movie they might have had 480 million dom
Now they have 350+400 = 750 DOM
For Hunger Games (which is what you're referring to, right?) yes, the studio will make a profit because its such a big franchise. With divergent its utterly ridiculous and its going to back fire, I wouldn't be surprised by an embarassing sub 30 OW
-
I think people are starting to realize these split movies are completely unnecessary.
Lol, I can't WAIT to see how Allegient Part 1 does. I'm laughing already.
-
1
-
-
I'm starting to regret my Sin City 2 over Avatar prediction. Hopefully, it still has a shot at beating The Avengers.
-
6
-
-
Titanic is an AWESOME movie and one of Cameron's best.
-
I can't believe a movie with a stupid talking raccoon and a dumb ass tree is making so much money. Go Turtles!
92% on rottentomatoes vs 20% on rottentomatoes
hmmm...I can believe it.
-
1
-
-
TMNT is about to make more money than HTTYD 2's opening weekend.......just let that sink in a little.........
-
1
-
-
Its astonishing that the movie that came out 14 years ago had the best makeup of them all. First class mystique looks like shit compared to this....you can tell they put a lot of time and effort here.
-
1
-
-
I thought this film would open at 45 million and make 130 domestic, 240 worldwide.....
FAIL.
-
Domestic predictions (based on anecdotal WOM):
Avatar 2 - $475m
Avatar 3 - $445m
Avatar 4 - $415m
Agree with Hatebox, I'd love to see what this underwater environment is like.
Avatar 2 - 460m
Avatar 3 - 445m
Avatar 4 - 480m
There is NO WAY Avatar 2 makes that "little". The internet hate may be skewed but the general public LOVED this film. Dvd/Bluray sales + tv replay proves it. When the trailers come out everyone will get excited again.
550 it the minimum for Avatar 2. I can see Avatar 3 and Avatar 4 decreasing significantly if the second one isn't good.
-
2
-
-
...And the vfx team, and the set designer, and the film composer, and the director, and the screenwriters, and the two annoying scientists, and the entire ridiculosly stupid aliens subplot, and the art director....
I think I might be missing a few
-
2
-
Passengers | Chris Pratt, Jennifer Lawrence | Dec 21, 2016 | Trailer pg 70
in Box Office Discussion
Posted