Jump to content

Eric Lasagna

Junior Admin
  • Posts

    36,127
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    443

Posts posted by Eric Lasagna

  1. 6 minutes ago, The Pandaren said:

    I have awoken... And it appears I have an apology to make....

     

    You may have noticed this weekend, I haven't actually been myself... You may have heard me say, "Warcraft is my favorite movie of all time," but let me start from the beginning.

     

    Earlier this Thursday I began delving and searching for a way for the forum to see how crazy some of the fanboys really were, and I believe I delved into some "magic" I shouldn't have in the deep Bamboo forest.  I know it's not excuse, I was just fed up with the constant "Civil War is the best movie ever!", "If you didn't like BvS you're a hater!", I wanted the forum to know. 

     

    Anyways, when I went to see Warcraft later that night I was overtaken...  And corrupted by the Fel...  Out of desperation it appears I had discovered the Fel and was overtaken, and it consumed me like it had consumed Medivh and Gul'dan, and I became a raging, vile Warcraft fanboy.  

     

    With the help of that one Mage in the Warcraft movie who wasn't Ben Foster (but still sucked at acting), I have managed to escape the clutches of the Fel, and have gained my sanity back.  I'm sorry to say, but you shouldn't trust anything I said about Warcraft since, well I saw Warcraft on Thursday night.

     

    Now that my sanity has returned, I must say, Warcraft is not my favorite movie of all time.  Not even close.  But I have talked to long, and I will post my full, real review in the Warcraft review thread in a little bit.

     

    Hopefully, I never turn into what the worst this forum has to offer ever again.

    It's still at least an A++ though, right?

    • Like 1
  2. Really enjoyed reading this (might steal the idea someday :ph34r:), but I would say that I was a little disappointed that To Kill a Mockingbird didn't get a mention. Of course I'm biased, since the book and the movie are pretty much perfect in my eyes, but I do feel that not only did Gregory Peck and Mary Badham set the bar for all future actors to come in terms of conviction and character, but it spoke about the unfairness of bigotry, hatred, and intolerance, something that society has unfortunately carried on, and will likely continue on for decades. It asks us to crawl into another man's skin, and tells us about the importance of growing up and maturing in a way that most filmmakers could never touch on so effectively. Not mad at the overall list, and I know that you might not have the same connection, but it still feels kinda empty to me.

    • Like 3
  3. 17 minutes ago, Treecraft said:

    what oscar change?

    Before The Dark Knight's release, the Oscar nominees for Best Picture only went up to 5, and very rarely did big-budget tentpoles get much attention from the Academy. In 2008, Dark Knight and Wall-E took the world by storm and were acclaimed by pretty much everyone, but they weren't nominated, and instead, each slot was given to movies that were good, but nowhere near as strong as those summer blockbusters, resulting in backlash from film fans demanding that these crowd-pleasers are just as, if not more strong than those Oscar bait dramas. Because of the heavy backlash, the Academy decided to expand the Best Picture category to 10, which gave helped give BP noms to movies like Avatar, Up, Toy Story 3, and Inception. They did do some changes here and there with how many BP nominees would be given each year, but even now, movies like Gravity, The Martian, and Mad Max: Fury Road are being placed with movies like Philomena and Argo, making the BP roster far more diverse as a result.

    • Like 2
  4. Story time for The Dark Knight: I was around 10 years old when I saw it with my older brother and my mom. I wasn't the biggest superhero movie fan, since I grew up more as a comedy movie and cartoon movie fan, but I liked Spider-Man, and I liked Fantastic Four, so I expected a superhero movie along those lines. Something fun, bouncy, and somewhat kid-friendly, but still with some serious moments.

     

    Spoiler alert: That didn't happen. Keep in mind that as a kid, I was a gigantic scaredy-cat, even at age 10, so seeing that movie pretty much blindsided what I thought about comic book movies, and the intense action scenes and Heath Ledger's Joker were in my nightmares for weeks.

     

    I still have yet to see the entire movie in one sitting, nor any of the other Nolan Batman films, but I will admit that it probably helped me gain more interest in the Batman lore, as a couple years after the movie came out, I became obsessed with the Arkham games, and I later fell in love with Tim Burton's films. I also started to care more about comic book movies after 2008 rolled around, so maybe Dark Knight actually helped me acquire better taste.

    • Like 3
  5. 56 minutes ago, CJohn said:

    But Taken 2 is a midtier sequel as well. And it exploded. Same with Pitch Perfect. What you are talking about simply doesn't work like that. Alice 2 was a sequel to a MONSTER hit. Yet it also bombed. There is no magic formula.

    Actually, maybe there is. The way I see things, the reason why most movies succeed is through the marketing and timing. After all, trailers and TV spots are a major influence on people saying "Oh, I wanna see that" or "Looks lame. I'll just wait for Netflix" Something like Taken 2 and Pitch Perfect 2 managed to succeed because they took the basic premise, but upped the stakes with larger budgets and a bigger scope, and they showed that through the advertising, making it not seem like the exact same movie with one minor difference. They also arrived about three years or so after the first movie, which meant that the movies were still relevant and fresh in the general public's minds.

     

    Alice 2's marketing made it look like the first movie, but with Sacha Baron Cohen hamming it up. Not really a whole lot to get excited for, and that's not including how it had a six-year gap, that sweet spot where it isn't fresh in people's minds, nor nostalgic enough for the original viewers. Neighbors 2 was advertised as the same movie, but with sorority girls. Not really something fresh and a must-see, even with a two-year gap. TMNT 2 faced similar issues with Neighbors 2, as it really only had two new mutants to offer and again had marketing that gave it much differentiation from its predecessor. Ya see where I'm going with this?

  6. 5 minutes ago, Treecraft said:

    How is The Magnificent Seven a "guaranteed hit"? It's a western...

    Storks should do OK, I forgot about Sully oops. Don't see any reason why Deepwater Horizon should do well. It's not got anything going for it, and has several things against it (sea-disaster movies, public hostility towards the events)

    For Deepwater Horizon, it's got Peter Berg and Mark Wahlberg teaming up again, right after Lone Survivor performed well, and the marketing seems to be pretty effective in interesting Middle America with their whole family vibe and survivor angle. I can see it doing around Lone Survivor numbers, maybe lower.

  7. 14 minutes ago, grim22 said:

     

    I don't see a Jurassic World, San Andreas or Inside Out style breakout coming up in June. Last year also had Spy, Insidious 3 and Ted 2 (it did make 81M) providing good support as well. June will almost surely be down from 2015 as well.

     

    July, I think can match 2015, unless everything continues the bombathon.

    I agree with you on that, but June will have at least 3 strong performers, which is way better than May's 1.

  8. 4 minutes ago, grim22 said:

    Worst May in 10 years, down 40% from last year

     

    Year Total Gross Change Movies Avg. Avg.
    Drop*
    #1 Movie Gross % of
    Total
    2016 $709.4 -40.0% 47 $15.1 -52.6% Captain America 3 $380.2 53.6%
    2015 $1,183.0 -4.2% 65 $18.2 -59.3% Avengers: Age of Ultron $459.0 38.8%
    2014 $1,234.3 -15.5% 61 $20.2 -44.9% Maleficent $241.4 19.6%
    2013 $1,461.1 +23.8% 62 $23.6 -51.7% Iron Man 3 $409.0 28.0%
    2012 $1,180.3 -1.2% 60 $19.7 -43.5% The Avengers $623.4 52.8%
    2011 $1,194.2 +25.5% 44 $27.1 -47.3% The Hangover Part II $254.5 21.3%
    2010 $951.8 -27.7% 42 $22.7 -50.4% Iron Man 2 $312.4 32.8%
    2009 $1,316.9 +12.8% 39 $33.8 -53.6% Up $293.0 22.3%
    2008 $1,167.2 +7.5% 51 $22.9 -53.1% Iron Man $318.4 27.3%
    2007 $1,085.4 +20.4% 52 $20.9 -50.1% Spider-Man 3 $336.5 31.0%

    xDCJuFw.gif

     

    Save us June from this catastrophe!

  9. Snow white kinda sorta did save Disney. While the studio was doing well financially, Walt poured almost all of the studio's budget, as well as him mortgaging his own house in order to make the film possible, making it pretty much the Waterworld of the 30s, minus the crushing disappointment. But as said, Cinderella also was another big risk with a giant budget at the time, and could have closed the studio down, since a lot of money was lost during WWII. Sleeping Beauty though was a flop in the box office, which made the studio hesitant on another fairy tale until The Little Mermaid came and put Disney back into the limelight.

     

    (I'm a huge Disney nerd, BTW, so ask me any Disney-related questions at any time :ph34r:)

    • Like 8
  10. http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2016/05/30/sneak-peek-exclusive-cars-3-new-character-cruz-ramirez/84981778/?hootPostID=15e4821211580d8c480a7f4ec7f520ef

     

    Quote

    Championship racer Lightning McQueen, voiced by Owen Wilson, will need help to compete in the increasingly high-tech racing world of the upcoming Cars 3.

     

    That’s where the new trainer comes in — the sleek, yellow Cruz Ramirez is a young Hispanic female race car who instructs Lightning McQueen, as this exclusive concept art depicts during a beach run.

     

    “Cruz Ramirez is trying to figure out how this old dog can learn some new tricks,” says Cars 3 director Brian Fee.

     

    Pixar's anthropomorphic Cars franchise has followed Lightning McQueen as a rookie racing for the Piston Cup in Cars (2006) and around the globe in the World Grand Prix in Cars 2 (2011). But in Cars 3 (in theaters June 16, 2017), McQueen has progressed beyond veteran status.

     

    “Think of where he’d be in his career now in real time,” says Fee. “(McQueen) is not an old man, but he's one of the older cars on the circuit with new rookies coming in. People start to wonder and ask when he might retire.”

     

    These questions grow louder after a race trouncing by upstart Jackson Storm.

     

    Jackson Storm is the face of these rookies who have come onto the scene,” says Fee. “And McQueen is in a position where his entire racing generation is being pushed out.  But it’s too early to be shown the door right now.”

     

    Ramirez aims to help him adapt and close the technical gap. The duo prepare in the racing off-season for McQueen’s one chance to show he’s got the goods in the Florida 500 (the equivalent of the Daytona 500).

     

    “Everyone can relate to feeling like someone is at their heels, that they might be a little outdated in something they used to be very good at, feeling an expiration date. And knowing you need someone to help you get a second chance," says Fee.

     

    Cars 3 is deep in production with some story points still being solidified and major casting (such as voices for Ramirez and Storm) not yet announced. But animation already underway in established scenes.

     

    “We’re still creating the blueprints on some rooms of this house, but we’re starting to paint in other rooms,” the director says.

     

    Fee is well entrenched in the Cars world for his directorial debut, after serving as storyboard animator in Cars and Cars 2, directed by John Lasseter.

     

    “Brian was part of the original story team on Cars, so he really knows the DNA,” says Lasseter, now chief creative officer for Walt Disney and Pixar Animation Studios and executive producer for Cars 3.

     

    Cars 3 will feature McQueen with his signature Cars look and bring back familiar characters from the original's Radiator Springs, including tow-truck Mater (Larry the Cable Guy), girlfriend Sally Carrera (Bonnie Hunt) and auto-body shop owner Ramone (Cheech Marin).

     

    The story will stay in America, hitting historical race sites throughout the country.

     

    “This movie is a love letter to racing and the American way,” says Fee. “We’re inspired by the Americana you see traveling through the South where every small town has a dirt track.”

    635998682599351107-cars3-concept-art-201

     

    635998684668262893-cars3-concept-art-201

    • Like 1
  11. I definitely enjoyed the movie, but it's definitely a huge departure in quality from the previous ones. While it's admirable that Singer attempts to add in dozens of new characters in addition to the growing relationships between Charles, Erik, and Mystique, but it leaves a lot of things underdeveloped or flat-out uninteresting. The new actors did fine, but they didn't really have much going for them, outside of their short story arcs, and Quicksilver's reveal about Magneto being his father felt tacked on and unneeded. Not to mention, the climax felt overlong and way too small in scale for what is supposedly the X-Men's biggest baddie. That said, Charles, Erik, Quicksilver, and Mystique are likable and interesting as always, and I enjoyed Apocalypse (although I do wonder why he doesn't use his powers to make the X-Men fall into the earth). The Wolverine cameo was fun, if unneeded, and I do like the inner battle between Charles and Apocalypse. I do see plenty of potential here for the next movie to be another strong film in the franchise, so hopefully Apocalypse will lead to greener pastures in the future.

     

    3/5

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.