Jump to content

HummingLemon

Free Account+
  • Posts

    337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HummingLemon

  1. 30 minutes ago, SpiderByte said:

    Cinemascore isn't critical response though. There are movies that suck ass with great cinemascore and vice versa. Gran Turismo got an A, are you gonna seriously claim it's more popular than Multiverse of Madness based on that?

    I was talking about audience reception. OW of GOTG 3 was muted due to the meh audience reception of the past couple of MCU projects.

  2. 1 minute ago, TheFlatLannister said:

    It wasn't clear if Guardians was going to outopen Antman until the final week, which is a big yikes in itself. Strong reviews saved an otherwise underwhelming presales run. By T-7 most came to the conclusion that $100M+ was a safe bet

    Oof, that's bad. Especially for how trash Quantumania was

     

    How much do you think Guardians would've opening to had it released in May 2022 (right after No Way Home). . .before Doctor Strange, Thor, She-Hulk, and Ant-Man fucked everything up?

  3. 20 minutes ago, TheFlatLannister said:

    I would say sub $400M is a lot more likely than $1B+

    Well, I agree. Not because $400M is likely but because $1 billion is so unbelievably unlikely. Also, when pre-sales start, what do you expect this to be tracking for for the 5 day weekend? I remember you said Marvels would track like John Wick 4/The Little Mermaid or smthn

  4. 16 minutes ago, SpiderByte said:

    Oh definitely. It'll be like guardians where people say the site not crashing is proof that it's gonna flop.

     

    And then it'll be a bunch of shouting and arguing and it'll just be a solid but lower than the first opening and not the Looking Glass level dropoff everyone expects

    I think a good comp is Secret Life of Pets, which went from 875 --> 431, basically a 50% drop. I could see The Marvels ending at like $575M WW which would roughly be a 50% drop from CM1. 

    • Like 1
  5. 23 minutes ago, Arlborn said:

    This is what gives me some confidence that this won’t drop as badly as some think. I think the vibes of the first movie really clicked with a casual audience that should also be here for this one if the vibes are the same 

    I could see it, Aquaman 2 doesn't have the things that held the other post-Aquaman movies back

     

    Shazam 1 - Unknown character, small scale, kinda cheap

    Birds of Prey - R-rated, meh marketing, cheap, D-list characters

    WW84 & TSS - COVID + HBO Max

    Black Adam - New character, did quite decent actually

    Shazam 2 & Blue Beetle - Post pandemic, nobody cares about these characters

    Flash - Reddit fanfic movie made specifically for DC fans (+ toxic WOM)

     

    Aquaman 2 doesn't have

    1. A character nobody cares about

    2. A small budget/cheap in scale

     

    . . .and it also has a good release date

     

    DCEU is buried but I can see it doing well based on its own terms 

    • Like 1
  6. 1 minute ago, MovieMan89 said:

    Literally only f9 and Black widow were able to gross anything remotely resembling a blockbuster before SC, and they were major established sequels/characters. I have no idea how it can be said SC wasn’t still fighting a major COVID battle at the box office. People just didn’t want to go back, even if it was considered safer. Without a massive event like NWH, who knows if we’d be back to getting true blockbuster grosses again. A lot of people needed to be dragged kicking and screaming out of their streaming habits to remember the magic of the theater.  

     

    Yes, there's no denying that COVID hurt it. I just don't think it hurt it to the extent that you're saying. Domestically, I don't think COVID removed 55% of its potential gross.

  7. 1 minute ago, MovieMan89 said:

    SC was the first movie to do much of anything post COVID, I think that alone says it all about how impressive it was and how much the pandemic still hurt it. The vast majority of the GA simply would not go to a movie up until a true event movie pulled people back (aka NWH). Release it post NWH and I can’t see how the gross doesn’t double at the very least. Put it more in summer 2022 where we were really finally out of pandemic being much of a factor, and 1b for sure imo. I think it could have been a 500 DOM hit, really seemed like the general reception was phenomenal. 

    Eh I would've liked for that to happen, but I don't think the pandemic hurt it *that* much. My guess is like $300M domestic + $300M OS + $100M China = $700M WW (without a pandemic)

    • Like 1
  8. 6 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:

    There was also still way more momentum for MCU when that came out, in spite of COVID. And the movie turned out to be a definite crowd pleaser. I maintain it was an easy 1bil+ huge breakout for that one in a healthier market, really tragic that’s one of the ones that had to get hit by COVID the hardest. 

    That is true. The massive difference in general Marvel hype/positivity in Sep 2021 vs Sep 2023 is pretty crazy.

     

    Also I don't think Shang-Chi would've done $1 billion without the pandemic. COVID wasn't that bad when it released so it probably would've done like ~$700-750M, somewhere in the realm of Doctor Strange/Guardians of the Galaxy. And also, how much do you think it would've done domestically without the pandemic?

  9. 4 minutes ago, ChipDerby said:

    It is truly fascinating to see how peoples brains work. Like, outside of one single example in Alice In Wonderland 2, there are no others where a sequel to a $400 mil Domestic (or $1 bil WW) film fell this sharply. It never happens. Even the garbage JW:D film made over a billion.

     

    Just wild to me seeing some of these predictions.

    Secret Life of Pets went from $369M to $158M (yes I know that's not $400m domestic but it's close enough)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.