Jump to content

Rogerio

Free Account+
  • Posts

    305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rogerio

  1. So, Viewer Anon replied something to Rowling on twitter.. 

    don´t believe he will really do that, but it seems he revealed the chinese creature of the movie..

     

    Spoiler
    Hi, Jo. The threats against you are terrible. And the next time you suggest trans people are a threat to women, I’m going to release a beat-for-beat summary of Fantastic Beasts 3 online. People are going to love hearing about the Qilin. Cheers.

     

  2. 6 hours ago, ViewerAnon said:

     

    I don’t believe so. At least that’s not something I have heard.

    Thank you so much !! 
    I really believed that Aurelius would have Ariana’s obscurus into him..

     

    or the Philosopher stone thing about creating a new human or something about him transfering it to a baby 

     

    but don’t believe it’s the case.. 

    that’s really sad 

     

    ps: After I knew that Ariana means silver and Aurelius gold I was pretty sure about the philosopher stone theory.. but it seams it was just a coincidence 

  3. On 6/28/2021 at 12:26 PM, ViewerAnon said:

     

    I'll be honest, the reactions I've heard aren't great. I've asked a number of people how they graded it on the score card (Excellent/Very Good/Good/Fair/Poor being the the choices) and I heard one Good, a few Fairs, and two Poors.

     

    Even Good is considered a negative score by the studios.

    Oh mine.. that´s bad...

     

    Could you just tell us about that thing I wrote above?

     

    If Dumbledore transfered Ariana´s obscurus to Credence?

     

    Maybe just YES or NO?

  4. On 12/2/2018 at 3:36 PM, Rogerio said:

    This weekend, if we exclude China, the movie did almost 80% of the amount FB1 did OS-China. 

    If it does 50% of the amount FB1 did OS-China after its third weekend and nothing more in China, it will do about 460M . 

    I believe it can do at least 480M, and 500M is not impossible if it retains 75-80% from now on

    This week it did about 77.5% of what FB1 did on its fourth week OS-China

    If Crimes could somehow make 80% of what the first one did OS -china in the rest of its run, then we could have 500M

    Don't think it is much probable.. 

    Believe in 485-490M

  5. Don´t think FB1 was the problem. 

    It was very well received (for me, it was a surprise). 

    FB2 opened very well overseas (yes, includind China). But legs are not good, because of the WoM. 

    I also think it could go much higher domestic if it had a better score on rotten tomatoes.

    Maybe it could do 750M WW if it was well received. 

     

    But if they don´t change the diretor and hire another writer to help her, this series will be in big trouble. 

    We can´t just say "Oh, if was Rowling´s fault, not Yates".. ok, it can be true, but Yates is a medíocre director, if they want to recover the public attention, they need to do BIG changes. 

  6. 38 minutes ago, Gavin Feng said:

    $170M DOM

    $440M oversea

    $610M WW

    This weekend, if we exclude China, the movie did almost 80% of the amount FB1 did OS-China. 

    If it does 50% of the amount FB1 did OS-China after its third weekend and nothing more in China, it will do about 460M . 

    I believe it can do at least 480M, and 500M is not impossible if it retains 75-80% from now on

  7. Depp is a dumb, Amber is also a dumb (yes, she did the same Depp did for her with another one).

    Rowling did nothing to Amber.

    There are LOTS OF PEOPLE involved with the movies, and we can´t say the movies deserve to flop just because of the presence of Depp and Amber. But yes, Rowling/ Yates didn´t do a very good movie, so we can understand the underperformance. Let´s wait for Aquaman. 

    And I don´t understand why someone hates Depp so much and wishes a flop for the movie, but at the same time praises Batman vs Superman, that has Ben Affleck

     

  8. 7 minutes ago, TwoMisfits said:

    It's kinda a catastrophic WOM number...I mean, nothing opened and it barely lost screens...for comparison, 56/59 for JL on drops vs 52/64ish for FB...maybe JL was the best comparison movie for final box office OW multiplier...

     

    13 minutes ago, Zakiyyah6 said:

    I knew that early 13mil number for FB2 was bullshit. The word of mouth for the film is tepid. Period.

    Don´t know if I understood wrong, but it seems that the drop from last Friday is better than FB1 and Justice League. 

    And if the movie behaves as FB1, it will do 13,5M, isn´t it? 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.