Jump to content

pieman

Free Account+
  • Posts

    731
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pieman

  1. BEST PICTURE: 12 Years a Slave

    BEST DIRECTOR: Alfonso Cuaron - Gravity

    BEST ACTOR: Matthew McConaghey - Dallas Buyers Club

    BEST ACTRESS: Cate Blanchett - Blue Jasmine

    BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY: American Hustle

    BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY: 12 Years a Slave

    BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: Jared Leto - Dallas Buyers Club

    BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS: Lupita N'yongo - 12 Years a Slave

    BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY: Gravity

    BEST EDITING: Captain Phillips

    BEST ORIGINAL SCORE: Gravity

    BEST SOUND MIXING: Gravity

    BEST SOUND EDITING: Gravity

    BEST VISUAL EFFECTS: Gravity

    BEST MAKEUP: Dallas Buyers Club

    BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN: The Great Gatsby

    BEST COSTUMES: The Great Gatsby

    BEST ORIGINAL SONG: "Ordinary Love" - Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom

    BEST ANIMATED FEATURE: Frozen

    BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM: The Great Beauty

    BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE: 20 Feet from Stardom

    BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT: Helium

    BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT: The Lady in Number 6

    BEST ANIMATED SHORT: Get a Horse

  2. Strange that Grudge Match did THAT badly because I did see a decent amount of promotion for it.

     

    I'm pleasantly surprised at how well 12 Years a Slave did as usually films about American issues/history don't usually do very well. The per theatre average is pretty strong.

     

    And Banks should cross 10 million which is nice. I also didn't expect The Book Thief to play as well as it did even with the Australian influence.

  3. Yeah, there is to much momentum behind Frozen now for it to lose.  In fact, if they had campaign Frozen for Best Picture instead of Banks it probably would have been nominated.

     

    There would be absolutely no chance of that happening. It's an okay movie but it is by no means worthy of Best Picture. It is too kid-ish to be nominated for Best Picture. These are adults who take their vote for Best Picture seriously.

  4. 12 Years a Slave

    American Hustle

    Captain Phillips

    Gravity

    Her

    Nebraska

     

    I think Gravity, 12 Years a Slave and American Hustle will take a good percentage of the number 1 votes leaving room for maybe 6 total nominees.

     

    Votes are redistributed after a film gets 20% of the number one votes so I don't think it would cause anything that major.

  5. But it doesn't seem to be getting a lot of sessions for a new release.Saw it today and quiet enjoyed it even thought it did take a few liberties with history.

     

    Who cares about it taking a few liberties, so has every movie ever made based on a true story. It's the nature of art and I doubt you would say the same thing about something like The Wolf of Wall Street or Rush.

     

    I agree though that it doesn't seem to be getting many sessions but that will change next week. It's not indicative of it's success.

  6. I think the internet film snobs are way overestimating Inside Llewyn Davis and Her. I think only one of them can get into Best Picture and it will probably be Her because it's had a much better precursor run. It's like when people were still predicting The Master and Moonrise Kingdom to get nominated despite little precursor support.

     

    I also think that Dallas Buyers Club, despite doing well with the guilds, could get ignored in Best Picture (it seems to me like the type of film that would have a hard time generating that many number 1 votes). This would leave space for the more conventional but Academy friendly films like Philomena and Saving Mr Banks to get in. Which I think is what will happen.

    • Like 2
  7. Philomena's BAFTA nom you could just say is them throwing a British film in the line-up, because it's kinda obligatory for them and the golden globe nom could be justified by saying it was a sorta weaker field. I mean, so many of the contenders were over in the comedy/musical category this year, anyway.

     

    I think Saving Mr. Banks has a better chance but they are both targeting the same demographic. Philomena got in because the HFPA really loved it disproportionately to everyone else. It got in for BAFTA because it's the token Brit Best Picture nominee.

     

    Saving Mr Banks may have not gotten the globe nod for Best Picture either because the Disney thing didn't translate to some of the foreign journalists or because it was sort of on the cusp of Drama and Comedy, and they didn't think it had the gravitas to compete in Drama.

     

    I also maintain that SMB missed the SAG ensemble nod because it's a film about Hollywood and the creative process that almost entirely shuns the role of actors. I still think the film is a near lock for a nomination and I think a lot of the cynics that have been rallying against the film are going to look foolish for shutting it out of their predictions.

    • Like 2
  8. ONTOH, Philomena got three of the main precursors (Globe, BFCA, BAFTA), has the British touch (sooo important), is friendlier to the Academy tastes, and is having a very good BO run.

     

    I think Philomena is well liked but this category is just so damn crowded this year and maybe it's just too small a film to stand out.

     

    It didn't get BFCA and I think the Globe and BAFTA noms are justifiable without bearing any significance on the Oscar race.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.