-
Posts
4,624 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by cozmeesah
-
-
I love Dinklage, but it seems as if he's the Emmy's default male GoT nominee. Emilia? Love her but NO. Sam Heughan and/or Tobias Menzies deserved a nod for Outlander, just for the last two episodes alone. BUT, we know how the Emmys treat fantasy/sci-fi and they probably think they more than fulfilled their obligation with GoT, Maslany, and AHS. LOVE the Finn Witrock nom. He was terrifyingly psycho as Dandy.
-
I do notice that people aren't bitching about Kit being horrible anymore. He's given more to do and he shows what he can do.
-
I actually think that Alexa Davalos would be great. Looks-wise at least. If she left her hair curly, it would match very well with Kit's. I imagine they'd go with a British actress instead though. And Alexa might look a tad too old for Lyanna.
No Lily James, lol. There are plenty of already brunette actresses out there.
-
I think that, plus all the clues laid out in S5, pretty much says it has to be.
I can't WAIT to see it if it is. Who do we want as Lyanna if so? They should get someone huge, even if it is a tiny (in duration only) role.
Keira Knightly? Emily Blunt? (Not my suggestions, just naming people.)
-
Rth's source is rth. He looks at internal numbers and is nice enough to give us rough estimates. Unless it's very late/early in the morning, then his estimates are pretty much actuals.
- 7
-
You met Amanda Peet? Nice!
- 1
-
They didn't even let anyone ask a question about that, did they? Heh.
-
Speaking of:
http://youtu.be/Va1UPrFXHKA
- 1
-
Did anyone else see the leaked cam of the S6 trailer? Shit looks crazy.
Will be nice to see the official HD one later today though.
-
This airs on Saturday night but is available now on HBO Go.
Just got done watching it and I couldn't stop laughing. Highly recommend it if you want a laugh or 50.
REALLY dirty though, and if you don't like Andy Samberg's schtick you won't like this. But it's hysterical.
Kit Harington needs to do more comedy. He played that part perfectly. The celeb cameos made it even better.
- 4
-
Latest on Jon Snow Watch:
Kit Harington spotted at Wimbledon with long hair intact.
Plus the beard is long. AND he's been spotted in Belfast twice.
-
We need to get...
Frey pies.
- 1
-
I don't think that was it. I think she wanted to take everything off her that they might want to steal. And also it leaves a breadcrumb for anyone that goes looking for her.
- 1
-
The book does make it sound like he really is dead. He took like a dozen daggers or something from everyone.
He takes 4 in the book. And all it says is he doesn't feel the 4th, just the cold of the snow. Then the chapter ends.
-
I assume they shut him in somewhere or he was off hunting. He wasn't there in the book either.
-
Yeah, I laughed. Posted it all the same, as I'm sure someone else would see it and post it. Preemptive post.
-
-
All the clues and logic are there in the books and even the show. It's just Kit's two interviews that are throwing people for a loop. However, I said what I think about that in previous posts.
Also, why would GRRM hinge whether or not he gives D&D the rights to the show on them guessing Jon's mom if it's irrelevant in the end? Or if she's some nobody?
-
I think all of us but cmaster do, lol.
- 1
-
That's what I mean though.
I think they knew darn well that nearly 100% of book readers would be telling everyone "he's not really dead" therefore spoiling their big shocker. So they put those articles out immediately after the airing. I mean why else have John Bradley "debunk" theories?
It's like they're trying way too hard to counter what they know all book readers are saying.
A lot of people will stop watching if he's dead, and if they wanted to curb that and have people still wanting to watch the next season, they would have just let that go even IF it wasn't true. Because then people would be left with some kind of hope.
But either way they're kind of killing the show somewhat by having him talk. It seems like he's talking TOO much.
- 1
-
One thing though... him saying that would be spoiling GRRM's next book. There's NO way they'd deviate that much from the book with a character like Jon. And he's emphatically telling us what we'll find out in tWoW? Why would they let him?
Methinks he doth protest too much.
-
Well, all I'll say is that, if he is, it's the stupidest fucking thing in the entire book series and show.
Every other death had some point. Either the character impacted a lot of things or their death did. Jon's ENTIRE book arc would have been pointless. 100% pointless. So, if that's the case, I lose a lot of respect for GRRM. Why have us spend all that time with a character for no reason whatsoever?
- 1
-
We talked about that interview in the other thread. Basically it's bs. They knew book readers who've been discussing it for years would be telling everyone that he's probably not dead. So they had to do something or their big shocker wouldn't be so shocking.
-
And stupid tweet of the night goes to... @zensmile :
".@HBO, that was a really stupid deviation from the #GameofThrones book. #johnsnow was the only reason I was watching. I'm done w/ you now."
I get people getting mad at deviations but... that wasn't a deviation. At all. Besides more than 3 (and different) guys stabbing him and no wildlings being around, it was identical to the book.
Game of Thrones (TV ONLY) [Leaked Spoilers prohibited]
in Streaming, TV Series, & VOD Movies
Posted
The body wasn't doing the acting though. So, it wouldn't be fair if they let that matter. It was all in the face.