-
Posts
1,960 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by OncomingStorm93
-
-
Great movie, frequently amazing. Not a masterpiece like Fury Road but still top of the modern class. It’s the perfect compliment to Fury Road, swapping the perpetual action for perpetual story/character progression. I have issues with the third act but that’s for later.
This film shouldn’t exist. Fury Road did just okay financially, Miller is a decade older, he had that falling out with WB who themselves keep getting overhauled. Yet here we are, a true, fulfilling companion piece to one of the greatest action films in the history of cinema. Furiosa is nothing less than a miracle.
FWIW I though this film’s marketing was underwhelming going in.
-
4
-
-
Checks off every box. I’m expecting a huge Halloween breakout hit
-
Fathom Events, it’s your time to shine.
-
Lots of surprising/bad takes in here.
People forget that Hugh Jackman as Wolverine was the RDJ/Iron Man of comic book films before 2008, and then some overlap after, even if Iron Man was a whole lot bigger in totality. He was “the guy” for the X-Men franchise for decades. No shade to the rest of the incredible X-Men films, but Jackman was the frontman
-
5
-
-
My excitement for this is skyrocketing. Art and/or trash, this film’s existence is like an urban legend. I think this is already destined to be a cult classic, a midnight-movie
-
9
-
-
I saw something last night at a sold out IMAX showing of “KxG: Dumb Money” that I hadn’t seen in forever:
Two kids, like 10 year old boys, who clearly snuck into the theater and were seathopping until they were just sitting on the ground staring over seats.
Between that and Wingard’s passion for colorful guts and oozes, cinema is back baby.
-
1
-
2
-
-
I think part of the issue with KOTM was the overly-apocalyptic tone of the trailers, weirdly juxtaposed against classical/“beautiful” music and way too damn much orange/blue cinematography. Almost like a studio exec said people like those contrasting colors on posters so let’s literally drench every scene in the movie in orange or greenish-blue hues.
Anyway, I’m pleasantly surprised at how non-abysmal the reviews for this are and how strong the opening weekend looks to be.
Long live the moviegoers.
-
1
-
-
-
Finally got to this tonight.
“Kung Pow! Enter The Fist” had better ADR than the antagonist of this abomination.
-
Not even an earthquake can inspire a reaction out of Dakota Johnson. Not en ounce of emotion here. It’s just emptiness all the way down
https://x.com/etnow/status/1756123491798290554?s=46&t=fS7FMGKGufDc6pfSRp7OCg
-
1
-
-
I can’t believe The Rock just showed up and displaced [other movie] from a highly anticipated title bout with Wicked.
-
1 hour ago, MysteryMovieMogul said:
The only cost that matters for BO discussion is the $200 million that Apple paid, though, right? I guess I wonder why how much they made back matters.
You gotta factor that Apple views all these films more as marketing campaigns for their streaming service.After all, so much of the discussion is about Apple TV+. No press is bad press, free marketing, yadayadayada.
How relevant is the BO discussion in that larger context? Certainly not the same for a film that a studio spent $200m of their own production budget on.
Apple’s playing a different game. And I dare say it’s working for them.
-
34 minutes ago, Firepower said:
I don't believe for a second it's anywhere near that bad. But is there anything it did so outrageous in a bad way it warrants such reaction? From a trailer it looks like a crowdpleasing spy action comedy with lots of CGI and star cast, and I think I've seen some complaints about post-credit scene, but that's about it, it doesn't sound like something people would outright reject, audiences like "funny" CGI slop.
As someone who thinks it is indeed anywhere near that bad, here's some spoiler-free reasoning:
The dialogue is terrible. Starting with the "Argylle" book-within-the-movie, then the actual espionage. It's absolutely unimaginative at best, intellectually insulting at worst. The screenwriter on this has 4 screenwriting credits measured on RT (including Argylle). They're all between 8%-37%. I would be able to overlook the nonsensical plot twists if at least there was good banter, but this "crowdpleasing spy action comedy" lacks any of that (I'll give props where due, Catherine O'Hara has some great lines, but that's more because of her delivery)
What's the point of an all-star cast if they lack chemistry? An unfortunate side effect of this film's central mystery, globetrotting nature, and frequent plot twists is that the actors can't really latch onto their characters, or how their character relates to any other individual in this film. With a constantly shifting story, there's no consistent characterizations, and thus the all-star talent can't really dive into their parts fully. Squandered talent.
The action? I'm a Matthew Vaughn fan, but he's been neutered here by bad CGI and the PG-13 rating. When the action on display should clearly result in blood splatter throughout, but none to be seen, it takes me out. And there are some genuinely creative action scenes here, they just lack the impact they would have if Vaughn could be fully Vaughn. And the CGI is bad at times. Not "The Flash" bad, but still jarring.
Finally, the editing. It's not terrible, but there's a central conceit to the editing that I thought was very poorly implemented. Can't say more but you will know what I'm talking about if you see the film.
-
I can’t get over how unfathomably stupid that film was, from start to finish. Truly lost some brain cells last night. And the half-sold Century City crowd was laughing at the film at the end. Group of 30-somethings behind me called it the worst film they’ve ever seen as the credits started rolling, and in the moment I couldn’t disagree.
”The real Agent Argylle” is gonna be a juicy meme this year. As in the phrase itself.
-
1
-
-
This was the stupidest shlock I’ve seen in theaters post-Covid. What on earth was Vaughn smoking while putting this together.
The only good thing I can say about this film is that Sam Rockwell dance moments are in abundance.
-
2
-
-
maybe the real agent argylle was the friends we made along the way
-
13 minutes ago, Macleod said:
Morales was of course a last-minute recast; Nicholas Hoult was originally cast and apparently couldn't make it work scheduling-wise (which, in this case, I actually believe was legitimate...because, who wouldn't want to work with/against Cruise? Once in a lifetime opportunity.)
I didn’t have an issue with Morales as the big heavy. I’ve seen him in Narcos and Ozark. In those shows he played an character, here he was just an ominous, mostly emotionless exposition device. Perhaps they’re saving the character work for part 2? I doubt it given how much rewriting there was. Hoult’s character “background” would have had to be different, he couldn’t realistically be someone Hunt knew professionally 30 years ago. I wonder what that character was going to be…Also, Morales’ “Ethan!” yell at the end was Into Darkness “Khan!” level of laughable
-
I’m not concerned about the marketing for the second one, as long as they take the proper lessons from the marketing on this one.
That being the lack of a storytelling hook. It just relied on stunts, cinematography, and prior investment in the series, without adding any new clear hook. I just rewatched the trailers. The hook boils down to “big mysterious threat looms”. Big whoop.
Compare that to Ghost Protocol’s “Hunt and co get blamed for Moscow bombing”, Rogue Nation’s “Meet the evil counter-IMF” and Fallout’s “Bad guy from last time wants revenge with nukes” and also “Hunt gets babysitter”It boggles me why the Dead Reckoning marketing didn’t at least establish the race for the keys, or perhaps highlight Grace as the fresh face. The Entity didn’t need to be kept a secret, since it’s introduced very early in the film.
But at the same time, the truth is Esrai Morales didn’t have the presence of Cavill or Harris, The Entity doesn’t sound as interesting as The Syndicate, Atwell wasn’t given much action to show off, and the keys were weakly written plot devices.
Next film’s marketing needs to be clear on the story, not play the JJ Abrams mystery box game. -
I did catch American Fiction last night, greatly enjoyed it. Wasn’t what I was expecting based on the trailer. The racial satire is kinda secondary to a The Decendents style character study built around unpacking family trauma, in that tragicomedy mold. Not sure it’s an “awards worthy” performance from Wright. He’s fantastic but the role mostly calls for exasperation and resignation from him. Sterling K Brown was the MVP as he often is.
-
2
-
-
45 minutes ago, Issac Newton said:
How is that not a flop when you consider what The Marhvrvw dhsssj lynebwha-
1
-
-
Just got out. What an absolute delight. I do think the last 20 minutes were a bit too blasé but hard to ask for more overall. I enjoyed the songs, most notably Scrub Scrub. This is exactly the kind of movie I was expecting from the Paddington director, and I expect it to rake in the dough over the holidays. Look forward to seeing it again. And Timothee killed it.
-
2
-
-
33 minutes ago, DAJK said:
If Dreamworks does do a Shrek 5, I have my doubts it’ll do any more than 200 DOM at this point
That’s aspirational for OW but not impossible
-
3 minutes ago, Torontofan said:
Its funny movies like transformers 3 and dead mans chest have better cgi then current films.
Davy Jones IMO is still the industry standard bearer. It’s incredible the level of texture, individual animations, the lighting, and how the mocap captured Bill Night’s expressions
-
8
-
-
4 minutes ago, joselowe said:
You’ve got some wacky agenda going on.Wonka is tailor-made for holiday legs. I’ve got people in generations older and younger than me planning Xmas/NYE weekend viewings for this. And I’m not sure why Wonka and Hunger Games even need comparing, both will end their runs as unequivocal successes
-
4
-
INSIDE OUT 2 WEEKEND THREAD | 155M DOM, 140M OS | Summer is back, Disney saves the day! | 😂😢😡🤢😱😰😒🥱😳
in Box Office Discussion
Posted
What a time to be awake
I I thought IO2 was solid. Somehow lean and scattershot at the same time. An 8/10 to the first film’s 9/10. Caught it at the El Capitan though, first time experiencing that piece of history.
Bonkers numbers. More impressive IMO than Incredibles 2’s opening. That one overperformed also but not to this margin.
I still think Moana 2 looks and feels essentially like the D+ retrofit that it is, but it’s going to at least open well. I also think Mufasa has breakout potential… Barry Jenkins, the potential is there.