YSLDC
-
Posts
630 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by YSLDC
-
-
-
https://www.flickeringmyth.com/2017/03/movie-review-kong-skull-island-2017/
If every 2017 tentpole movie can be as good as Kong: Skull Island, we’re in for a great year of movies
-
Just now, Bishop54 said:
Am I allowed to post the after credit scene here? It's very bad quality.
Don't know, but plz DM-
1
-
-
-
-
-
OK, this is pretty.. promising.. Got the chills.
-
8
-
-
When people say the CW/Video Game/Animated/Lego version is better than the DCEU all I can think about is how much money WB is making from their DC brand. They reach a lot of people.
-
9
-
-
The Rings promo will smash the Chewbacca Mom record for most Facebook views. That has about 165 million views. Rings with 82 million views in about 5-6 hours.
-
Bravo Paramount.
Yeah, I know, that's not a lot of likes and retweets, but listen to this: 1 million shares and 40 million views on Facebook in 3 hours.
-
1
-
-
Another great spot.
Also, Jordan Vogt-Roberts looks really confident in this movie, so that's a plus. Amazing what he achieved with the visuals. First time director. I've never seen something like this.
-
2
-
-
9 minutes ago, TimmyRiggins said:
Hopefully Live By Night does better overseas. I guess the general audience really doesn't give much of a f*** about old school gangster movies. Hoping for the inevitable longer cut on BD/UHD
Russia results are not encouraging. Half of Collateral Beauty opening day -
-
-
-
50 minutes ago, IronJimbo said:
Feel like this chart is missing production cost
Just 2016 releases. Without 2015 releases that grossed money in 2016 and no re-releases or limited release.
Disney: 1.78 billion dollars. X4 Every dollar invested
Warner Bros.: 1.29 billion dollars. X4 Every dollar invested
Fox: 1.2 billion dollars. X3.75 Every dollar invested
Paramount: 916 million dollars. X1.8 Every dollar invested
Sony: 860 million dollars. X2.4 Every dollar invested
Universal: 835 million dollars. X3.9 Every dollar invested-
4
-
-
-
I'm so happy for Lionsgate. They deserve a win. La La Land, John Wick next month and then... Power Ranegrs!
-
19 minutes ago, jb007 said:
People who would not steal anywhere else are fine with downloading pirated movies. That is stealing too. I don't get ir.
If I feel a Rolex is too expensive, I just don't buy it. Stealing it is not the answer.
People will steal anything if the stakes are low.-
1
-
-
How is Collateral Beauty still in 3,000 theaters?
-
2 minutes ago, terrestrial said:
about 1.
Those willing to pay per VOD or... will pay for it later on too (depends on when later on is), they only further the amount of people not going to the cinemas.
A lot of people like to go to the cinemas, but not early in, as a lot of people do not like the loudnes,... of a full(ish) room.
If it is too early, they will loose a lot of audience to convenience. Imagine 1 times payed for the family against 4 tickets too, also a IMHO considerable part of the BO is per repeat viewing, dragging friends with them and similar combinations. They will loose a lot of those too.
about 2.
either I do not understand or you didn't understand my post.
I'd like to know why B's films are leading in getting pirated, as you told. There has to be a difference to other distributors, if correct.
Maybe provide a link, so I can read for myself and maybe find the detail I am looking for?
https://variety.com/2015/digital/news/top-10-pirated-movies-of-2015-see-alarming-increase-in-downloads-1201667982/
http://variety.com/2014/digital/news/top-20-most-pirated-movies-of-2014-led-by-wolf-of-wall-street-frozen-gravity-1201388403/
-
2
-
-
23 minutes ago, Alli said:
And in this instance they'll be even more pirated. Imagine having the movie online after two weeks. It would leak on the web immediately, just like all tv shows.
Bad idea
But they don't care about the people who pirate. They care about the untapped potential in people who skip theater or go to the theater once or twice a year and then will catch the movie on streaming or TV for a lower price.
15 minutes ago, terrestrial said:I'd like to know the whys.
Ratings? Not enough 2D? Too specialised genres (difficult to find a friend to accompany...) Or...?
IMHO it is the worst idea they ever had in the long run = in the POV of cinemas (how long will they get a share to compensate?), it will further the frontloadness = and as such bad for smaller films, I think those will get drowned even more, and for the people loving to see a film in a cinema still.
It might even impact on what a film will show, like huge panorama,... wont be as impacting at home, might get reduced in film-making in the long run.
It's all about the costumer. Nobody in the studios care about the film making aspect. -
6 minutes ago, Mojoguy said:
That's horrible. Talk about killing the movie going experience!
Well, to be fair, WB movies are the most pireted movies online, so I can understand why they'll do something like that. -
I don't like Fassbender
Mar 3-5 Weekend - Official Estimates - Logan 85.3m, Get Out 26.1m, Shack 16.1m, LEGO Bat 16.5, BIF 4.9m
in Numbers and Data
Posted
I hate Deadline