Jump to content

Noodlebug

Free Account+
  • Posts

    678
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Noodlebug

  1. The thing that gets me about this controversy is that Disney is just a giant corporation at the end of the day. Most Americans support LGBT rights in a broad sense, so it makes sense that Disney is going to signal in that direction. It doesn't mean their super supportive, either, as we know they only do the bare minimum when it comes to pandering, but they're not going to take an anti-gay stance that's going to cost them money.

     

    You'd think conservatives would understand that Disney is simply operating under the mindset of free market capitalism.

    • Like 2
  2. 1 minute ago, YourMother the Edgelord said:

    Same, Widow worked best as a supporting character and it feels 6 years too late. 

     

    Now The Eternals could easily be big. If I were Disney, I move it to December and ditch Cruella as it's already dead.

    Widow was never really that interesting, either. She's great as a supporting character, like you said, but I absolutely have no interest in a solo film about her.

    • Like 2
  3. Just now, TServo2049 said:

    Is Alice in Wonderland THAT forgotten? (Not that I’m complaining, from all I understand it was dogshit.)

    Alice was way back in 2010. It technically counts, I guess, but the live action adaptations of the 80's/90's Disney classics started in 2015 with Cinderella, I believe. After that, we had Jungle Book, Beauty and the Beast, Dumbo, Aladdin, TLK, Mulan, etc.

  4. Marvel will still be dominant, but I do see it slowing down for the next few years. Problem for the competition, though, is that the DCEU as a whole is pretty dead, SW is hit or miss, and Avatar is a wild card. This can go many ways, but Marvel is so dominant at this point that even if all their upcoming films for the next couple years only make half of EG, they'll still be #1.

    • ...wtf 1
  5. I've just watched the first three and am halfway through the fourth. Great series so far. 1 was good but felt very dated and seemed more like a two hour television episode, 2 was so boring (except for the last half hour) that I almost stopped watching entirely, 3 definitely put the series back on track and has a perfect mix of action and intrigue, and 4 seems to be even better, from what I've watched so far.

  6. 1 hour ago, Barnack said:

    I feel the same (at least was my first impression), maybe not know but suspect something bigger than just tweets, because Guardian of the Galaxy 3 release is in 2020, this is so many news circle away for something so little that if I understand stopped before the release of Gotg 1 and was never under being a face of Disney.

     

    Or, they had a long fight with him about stopping is divisive twitter activities, maybe was even going against it's contract and they were already angry at him/disliking him and that was just what pushed it over the edge.

     

    That said, when people pointed out the Disney could have simply been in a: We really don't want to have a they fired Rosanne the good friend of the president but not the anti-Trump director narrative over their head going into one of the biggest corporate transaction in history that need the federal government approval situation, that did made sense also. If they Lasseter him back into Marvel after the transaction is all well done and nothing else come up, we could suspect that it was only that.

    Yeah, there could be some dark shit that Disney knows about Gunn and they're using these old tweets to get rid of him now before something comes out that really blows things up.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.