Like Ouija 2. First one was terrible but made 20x its budget, so why not put in another $5-10m and make another $30-40m. I imagine a second Visit film will be without MNS. I haven't see the film, but I'm not convinced he's out of he's doldrums. Give me one more good low budget film and I'll be convinced.
My reply to the comments I quoted did not revolve around why the budget was low, but why the film looks grander in scale for its budget. I simply pointed out rebates and tax credits were put to good use. Every film uses these benefits, but you don't always see it translated on the big screen.
No I didn't you're putting words in my mouth. If you read my comment, you will see I said "film rebates and tax credits are going to good use." I never said that the budget is low because of it.
Those budgets are atrocious too. That's a lot of money to film a movie. A good portion of those budgets went to Depp and RDJ to secure their roles. Pirates was a special case. The complexity of those films required a big budget.
That's two movies, which they are filming together. So not quite $500m for a single superhero tentpole. BTW, I have not heard of this ridiculous budget, so if it's true that is just atrocious.
Female-centric YA films do pretty well. We haven't had a male-centric YA film breakout since Harry Potter and that was special case, a whole different ball game.
BTW, I don't know of any superhero tentpole that has a production budget of half a billion dollars (about the cost of 4 THG films).
Quoting myself from the MR thread:
The movie will make money. It won't have the same merchandise and home video sales as Divergent, but its WW BO is healthy given its budget.