comicbookguy

Oh boy...it's films like this one that make you appreciate the craft of Matt Stone and Trey Parker This movie is exponentially worse than Deadpool in all ways possible.

I don't know what is wrong with these people at Collider but saying over and over again how much a movie made you 'laugh' or what type of 'laughing' you did is not a review of a movie. This review was more mindless than the actual movie. Worst. Review. Ever This is a review of a movie.

Ludcaris Chris Bridges has never struck me as a jabroni. So I don't Rock was talking about him and Tyrese couldn't hang around in Hollywood for as long as he has if he was a lazy so and so. I doubt it was either of those two. That leaves the rest of the 'candy asses'

You need better powers of perception. I couldn't be happier and more satisfied at the outcome of either of those two films. Too bad you can't exchange your empathy for hundreds of millions at the box office. In the meantime, I look onward at two fallen enemies and I smile with glee.

Justin Lin, Simon Pegg, JJ Abrams shouldn't have anything to do with Star Trek (or Star Wars). What happened to it? It simply wasn't a good Star Trek movie, it was barely a good movie at all. Ghostbusters? Morbid curiosity and pity tickets can only sell so far..and they only sell in the US too. LOL. Feig and McCarthy have no business anywhere near Ghostbusters. That's what happened to that movie. It's a flop. God is indeed merciful as there wont be any part two.

Of course I don't find it surprising. Disney is doing the same thing concerning Rogue One, WB and Ayer was doing it concerning Suicide Squad. I expect the lies, but I just call them out when I see them. SONY hasn't released anything about Passengers because of nothing to do with this delicate potentially multi-million dollar cross continental lawsuit taking place, a lawsuit that has locked up several films in it's grip...no no, that's not it...they aren't releasing any footage because of some other vague reason. Yes, for sure.

If it's just a movie..then why does SONY need to lie about it?

You haven't seen a single frame of this film? Why? The judge ordered not a single frame of film effected by MOVA can be released. If movies get out of preliminary injunctions all the time, then why, in the report of this story concerning the lawsuit, does it feature lawyers approaching the judge in a request of release, citing its star, its wealth, and with the knowledge that the reels have already been received from the tech company. Yet, we saw no judge giving it the go ahead. The whole situation is reel and measurable. Never trust the studio's press releases when there are multi-millions on the line. It's safer to go with the judge who cant and wont lie or twist the public in a manipulative way.

I guess no one is paying attention or wants to believe that the reason they haven't seen a single frame of this movie is because of the obvious reason. That it's still on court order lockdown. SONY will say whatever to placate the public but their lies are all apart of a strategy to not spoil the anticipation of film before its finally released. The judge on this cross-continental multi-million dollar tech lawsuit has frozen all films connected to this project. Passengers is just one of them. Until that lawsuit is cleared up, regardless of whatever lies SONY tells the public, you won't be seeing a single frame of this movie.

The product being delivered to them doesn't mean anything at all. As I understand it, every project that used this technology that hasn't already been released, is on lock. Passengers isn't the only movie cut up in this fiasco, I think it's just the one closet to it's release date. No studio may use a single frame or render a single frame that has been subject to the MOVA tech. Now, unless they are doing reshoots of all the scenes that use that tech then they're stuck, no matter what they tell the public. There is a lot of money in this flick so they're going to be feeding the public a lot of non-sense, but just pay attention to that lawsuit cause everything else is just lip service on the part of the studio. They'll lie to you, but that judge wont.

My god..what is that?! Also, I told you guys you're not seeing a trailer from this until that lawsuit gets cleared up. Its a serious cross continental lawsuit. They're not fucking around. The Judge has put a lock on all films involved with the MOVA technology. Unless some sort of leniency is given, you might as well forget about waiting for a trailer for now.

It's amazing how well honest comedy stays relevant. WARNING, some may find the follow offensive, but its just jokes...or is it?

The marketing for this movie will be different depending on where its featured. I love the fact this movie is bringing together eastern and western cinema on such a large scale. This is a highly anticipated movie for me...even still...it reminds me of that Chapelle Show sketch with Paul Mooney LMAO

Yes, but it's clearly still in play. The case is actually very delicate and extends beyond US borders apparently, so I don't think it's going to get go away anytime soon and clearly, the lack of trailer footage thus far would indicate that is the case. I know right? They have to remain coy though. Lawyers like to keep things as vague as possible when it comes to identities. They were trying to get the judge to budge.

You'll likely not be seeing any footage from this until that lawsuit clears up regarding the MOVA technology used in this film. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/digital-domain-mova-tech-banned-906902 SONY can't catch a break.