Jump to content

IdahoJacket

Free Account+
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by IdahoJacket

  1. 4 hours ago, dudalb said:

    I think CEO pay should be directly linked to how a company does as a whol; his pay should come from a share in the profits. Compnay does well, the CEO does well, the compnay does not do so well, the CEO does not do well.

    Most CEO pay comes in the form of stock grants, which reward raising the share price in the past, or options, which reward raising the stock price in the future.  Changing that to pay based directly on profits would have negative effects on their running of the company.  People already complain about CEOs being too short-term focused (despite a large chunk of their compensation being based on stock options) and tying their pay to current profitability would make that worse.  Long term investments by a company reduce current profitability so, under your proposal, would directly reduce CEO pay which would greatly disincentivize investment.

    • Like 2
  2. For anyone else who has Letterboxd, I made a list.  A few of the movies have slightly different titles/years and these are missing from Letterboxd (or at least I couldn't find them):

    The First Cry (2007)

    Luck Luck Ki Baat (2012)

    Apna Bhai Gaju Bhai (2016)

    It also combines Dr. Syn, Alias the Scarecrow (1964) and The Scarecrow of Romney Marsh (1963), probably because one is a TV version and the other is a theatrical cut of the same material

  3. This is a great example of why you should never believe something just because it was claimed in a lawsuit.

     

    When lawyers draft a lawsuit, they present the best possible case they can without outright lying (and a lot of times they come perilously close to outright lying).  They leave out facts, leave out context, and use every rhetorical trick to make their opponents look like the worst people on Earth.  If a lawsuit doesn't make the person filing it look to be in the right (at least legally), the lawyers involved seriously screwed up.

     

    And, of course, their opponents lawyers will do exactly the same thing from the other side with their response.  Until the real facts come out via discovery and the trial it is impossible to know what really happened and you should reserve judgement.

  4. 17 hours ago, Sophia Jane said:

    Also I’ve heard Korea’s Gender war is really fierce,maybe that’s another reason,Korea women refuse the “male gaze” so they think the heroine of TLM is the progress of women’s right(Even you’re not so beautiful you can still get the heroine position of Disney movie)

    This couldn't be further from the truth.  Korea is quite possibly the most beauty-obsessed country on Earth with massive per-capita spending on cosmetics and the most plastic surgeries per-capita in the world.

    • Like 4
  5. 4 hours ago, WittyUsername said:

    Ok, I realize that people here are probably sick of me being a Negative Nancy, but there’s something I might as well get off my chest. Assuming that James Gunn’s plan is to reboot the DCEU, and recast the entire Justice League, including Wonder Woman and Aquaman, it seems more and more apparent that this wouldn’t apply to TSS and Peacemaker, which I would find to be more than a little vexing.
     

    I would have a certain degree of respect for the decision to do a reboot if Gunn actually committed to it, but if he’s just going to keep the stuff he personally worked on, then that is just plain annoying. Not only would doing that not make any sense in terms of having a cohesive universe (seriously, we even saw Jason Momoa as Aquaman and Ezra Miller as the Flash in Peacemaker), but it would also come across as just a tad unprofessional on Gunn’s part, given that much of the people involved with TSS and Peacemaker happen to have personal connections to him.

     

    To be clear, I’m not saying that Gunn isn’t allowed to put his brother, his wife or his pals in his movies, but if he’s going to be the head of DC Studios, I would hope that he could try to have some sense of professionalism, and not simply do things that would satisfy his own ego. 
     

    Of course, I can concede that we still don’t know what exactly Gunn’s plans are, so I suppose it wouldn’t be fair for me to make any judgments at this stage. I just wish they would hurry up and let us know what’s going on. 

    We don't know exactly what Gunn's plans are, but he has addressed this

     

     

    • Like 1
  6. Ranking TV shows vs movies is hard enough, not really sure how much sense it makes to rank video games against either of them.  But I went ahead and tried.

     

    1. The Empire Strikes Back
    2. Star Wars
    3. Return of the Jedi
    4. TIE Fighter
    5. Andor
    6. The Clone Wars (2008)
    7. The Mandalorian
    8. Rebel Assault
    9. Revenge of the Sith
    10. Visions
    11. The Force Awakens
    12. Tales of the Jedi
    13. Lego Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy (game)
    14. Attack of the Clones
    15. Rogue One
    16. Star Wars Arcade (1980s)
    17. The Bad Batch
    18. Lego Star Wars Terrifying Tales
    19. The Clone Wars (2003)
    20. Lego Star Wars: The Force Awakens (game)
    21. The Phantom Menace
    22. Lego Star Wars (game)
    23. Star Wars (1991) (game)
    24. Lego Star Wars Holiday Special
    25. X-Wing vs. TIE Fighter
    26. Rebels
    27. Solo
    28. Rebel Assault II
    29. Lego Star Wars Summer Vacation
    30. Obi-Wan Kenobi
    31. Resistance
    32. Book of Boba Fett
    33. The Last Jedi
    34. The Rise of Skywalker
    35. Holiday Special

    • Like 1
  7. If the reports I've seen about the story are true, this goes way beyond Braveheart levels of inaccuracy.

     

    Spoiler

    From what I have read, they are going to be presented as a group fighting against slavery.  In reality, they were the exact opposite, fighting to continue their kingdom's slave economy.  That is like a movie about the American Civil War presenting Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia not merely as good guys, but as a force trying to end slavery.

     

    I will wait to reserve judgement until the movie actually comes out as pre-release leaks are unreliable, but right now I am not optimistic.

    • Like 1
  8. 8 minutes ago, excel1 said:

     

    100%. Vast majority of film goers chose which projects they watch based upon quality, not the ethnicity of those involved, wtf, who does that in 2022? WB and Zaslav know they need to make quality films, period, and people will come out. How many regular casual movie goers gave even a seconds thought to the skin tones of Catwoman and Gordon in THE BATMAN? They were instantly, universally accepted and acclaimed. Alan Horn will push them to make films for America, not Twitter, which is exactly how it should be. 

     

    People here loving drama.

     

    "How will they run the studio when they piss off all the talent?!"

    *Reeves signs first-look deal the next day*

    *crickets*

     

    "OMG they pushed back AQUABRO 2, they have no money!!"

    *Aquabro 2 now is the favorite in win 2023*

    *crickets*

    Not to mention the fact that they still have a ton of "diverse" movies still coming out.  If you look at their scheduled DC movies for this year and next:

    Black Adam - Black/Pacific Islander lead

    Blue Beetle - Hispanic lead and director

    Aquaman - White/Hawaiian lead and Malaysian Chinese director

    The Flash - White (non-binary) lead and Hispanic director

     

    Only Shazam has both a white lead and a white director.  There are also plenty of "diverse" non-DC movies scheduled such as House Party, Creed 3, and The Color Purple.  And one of the "creatives" Zaslav specifically offended was Clint Eastwood, an old white man.  Doesn't really fit the narrative of the racist CEO trying to eliminate all diversity in favor of white men.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.