Jump to content

Captain Craig

Free Account+
  • Posts

    9,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Captain Craig

  1. 13 minutes ago, Barnack said:

    What a fandom win mean ?

     

    What is the difference to say Denzel Washington fanbase and Jurassic Park fanbase here ?

    A Denzel fan still acknowledges that Mr.Washington is one man. Frequently you may see comments like, "I'm so glad he/she won 'x' award!". The fan doesn't feel any inherent ownership of the win, why I don't know cause I've had this same thought when and actor/actress won while in something I liked. Perhaps because it is the inverse of the below. I'm sure you have as well.

     

    Jurassic Park(insert franchise here) is a franchise you as the consumer actively participate in beyond the movie ticket. One might buy comics, novels, toys etc etc and therefore you feel like an active "owner" in the property and invested in its continued success. 

  2. 18 minutes ago, Barnack said:

    Sure but to the point of using "we", did anyone say we won after someone else won an Oscar ? And for studios-franchise ?

     

    I fully get the interest, rooting, but the inclusion of one self in the success-failure do seem like something that must be new.

    You have conflated your example, an individual actors win, with a fandom/genre win.

    To say it another way, you have an apples vs oranges comparison.

  3. 3 hours ago, Krissykins said:

    I’m assuming this will be big here in the UK but I’ve not seen any advertising. I’m sure there’s loads on normal TV though. 

     

    I’m guessing a huge chunk of its audience don’t go to the cinema often, so it will be interesting to see what happens. 

    Or just not frequent the cineplex. They probably all saw Magic Mike and/or 50 Shades of Grey though would be my guess when they did hit the cineplex last. 

  4. 3 hours ago, catlover said:

    Is it really that hard to understand? Most people don't have enough money to see every movie that they want to see. So they have to be selective. Only choose the ones that are worth the money. One of the selection processes is checking the reviews from the critics. If the reviews are good, then there's a bigger chance that they will enjoy the movie, than when the reviews are bad. That's not always the case, but it's another problem. It's actually that simple.

    Is it really so hard to understand that I'm perplexed how one doesn't know oneself after years of movie going to be able to make up ones own mind? You watch 2-3 trailers, see a few TV spots and you can't figure out for yourself if it might be good. You need some "pro" reviewer(s) aggregate score? The word of your own friends or co-workers isn't good enough?

    It's actually that simple.

    • Thanks 1
  5. My only concern about Sony once again being in full creative control of Spider-man is that I recall they suck at that.

     

    Sam Raimi controlled the creativity of Spiderman 1&2. 

    Sony then muddled and forced Raimi to put Venom in the script via Ari Arad.

    Sony then signs Raimi to a Spider-man 4&5 while giving Maguire $50m for both pictures. They hit Raimi with a hard deadline which he says he'll need more time to make the film(SM4 with Malkovich in talks for Vulture) he'd like to make. 

    Sony says, no we need the film when we say we need it, they fire Sam and Toby. Scrap SM4/5.

    Sony then gives us Amazing Spider-man 1&2 with a Lizard that has no real punch to him but to be there, blue Electro and a military mech style Rhino. 

    Sony also gives us a Venom story that is bad even if Tom Hardy make is somewhat watchable.

     

    I'm wholly worried about what Sony's "creative plans" are for the character.

     

    The MCU has a whole toy box. I'm actually happy with what we got with Spidey/IM/Avengers. 

    I can rest on an MCU Spidey till then. Lets see about Eternals, Shang-Chi, Fantastic Four, Black Knight and others.

  6. 1 hour ago, Macleod said:

    I wasn't implying Ant-Man was an "underperformer," rather that I see Widow grossing around Ant-Man levels worldwide. 

     

    I think if the Ant-Man films were as smash of a success as Marvel/Disney wanted them to be, however...we'd be hearing about a third already, by now...

     

    But too many Billion-dollar grossers simply creates too many expectations.  I'm betting that at least one of the upcoming Marvel slate films will be a significant underperformer relative to expectations.  It could be this...it could be Shang-Chi...it could be The Eternals...or Dr. Strange (if it gets made). 😉

    I still think an Ant-Man 3 will happen. There is just a lot on their plate now that X-Men/FF are back. Nothing wrong if AM sits out a Phase.

    Frankly with Tony dead that leaves Hank Pym as the tech "super guy" and a great place to meet Reed Richards. 

  7. On 8/7/2019 at 4:26 PM, Macleod said:

    (1.)No one was really asking for this movie other than hard-core Black Widow/Scarlett fans.  Unless this movie turns out to be a critical/audience phenomenon (highly doubtful), then it will underperform.  Agreed with many above, the Marvel brand is powerful, and it has a great cast, but this movie feels like an afterthought, a little too little, too late in the general timeline of things.  I doubt it will flop, but my bet is that (2.) it will be one of Marvel's most significant underperformers.  Yes, Ant-Man level. 

    1. Haha, not true. A BW film has been asked about by some time and by many, not just BW fans.

    2. No one legitimally calls Ant-Man films underperformers, they performed as expected and were profitable. 

     

    Hulk underperformed due to the unexpected massive Iron Man movie released 6 weeks earlier steamrolling it. That's really the only "blemish" on the MCU box office wise. 

     

  8. 23 hours ago, HeadShot said:

    You when A2 bombs 

    I'm no fan of Avatar but I do know Avatar 2 will not bomb. The rest is up in the air till we see how 2 does.

    I've no doubt that at this point it'll get some nostalgia dollars(people who can't recall anything but the effects), new dollars from folks born around/just after the original who've probably never seen it and think it looks great as well as actual fan dollars from those who actually liked/loved the original.

  9. On 8/7/2019 at 10:33 PM, JB33 said:

    Ah. Would explain why I was completely unaware. I don't venture over to reddit. Hell I'm not on social media anymore! What a breath of fresh air!

     

    One disturbing thing I have become aware of though is multiple people mentioning something about pedophile symbols on the movie poster. The only reason I'm not completely disregarding it is it just so happens I recently learned about the big, horrible secret in Hollywood right now: rampant pedophilia! I was led to the topic after watching a video on Youtube about the circumstances around Heath Ledger's death. I was so disturbed and emotional that night I couldn't sleep.

    What? What exactly is a "pedophile symbol"? Is this like the hand sign for "OK" suddenly being called a White Power sign post Trump election?

     

    I'm 43 and no one, ever, EVER has said that OK =White Power

    Now suddenly there are also Pedophile symbols....people just be making shit up and sheep on social media run with it like it's The Blair Witch Project. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.