Jump to content

Captain Craig

Free Account+
  • Posts

    9,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Captain Craig

  1. On 7/16/2019 at 6:50 PM, dudalb said:

    They were talking about the Kingsmen series being the new 007 until the second film underperformed at the box office.

    There have been other successful spy franchises, but none have come close to toppling Bond from his throne.

    I'd wager the closest spy franchise that has any clout is the Tom Cruise Mission Impossible series. Even considering that I agree with you assessment "none have come close to toppling Bond", Bond is still top dog and shall remain that way for some time.

     

    Now, it'll be curious to see what life, if any Mission Impossible and a recast Ethan Hunt can do. Will audiences take to that as they did say Roger Moore. If that happens then I think it is fair to say MI is a strong second contender. Till then though MI is just a solid spy franchise.

     

    I'd like another Damon Bourne film. To me that is the distant top third spy franchise.

     

    I found it interesting that the third XxX entry brought Vin back as well as Ice Cube in an expanded role and established that the XxX Program was growing and has had more agents. That franchise will never financially beat Bond or MI. However, I'd like to see what that goes. A fourth film has been rumored.

     

    A third Kingsman could right the ship. That franchise has potential. Can Disney/Fox correct course though??

  2. 32 minutes ago, NamakFiskKa said:

    A-What is a "new entry", that was part of my question.

    B-Is profit what  Avatree meant? Very typically as this is a Box Office site, BO is what is compared.

    C-Truthfully Venom was successful but if one thinks Sony isn't interested to get extra legitamcy for Venom by making it MCU fringe noteworthy because of Venom BO, or profit, take you're fooling yourself. Note: that was stated.

     

  3. On 8/5/2019 at 5:41 PM, Avatree said:

    they don't need to, given that they had more success with Venom than most of Marvel's new entries.

    MOST???

    Venom (2018):  $213m Dom ; $856m WW

     

    Black Panther(2017): $700m DOM ; $1.3b WW

    Captain Marvel(2019): $426m DOM ; $1.1b WW

     

    Those are really the only 2 "new entries", other entries are the 2 Avengers films. You surely don't mean those.

    It did better than Ant-Man & Wasp...worldwide but 1 film is not "MOST". The WW difference for Thor Ragnarok is a mere $3m and it blasted Venom in the vs Domestic category.

     

    You're off base. Look Venom did well but your statement is inaccurate.

  4. 2 hours ago, filmlover said:

    Vin doesn't have much to laugh at cause nobody sees his non-Fast & Furious movies unless he's playing a talking tree. February's Bloodshot sounds like another bomb for him.

    I see XxX and Riddick myself of which I'd see future installments if/when they get off the ground.

     

    I'm very, very, very curious and excited about Bloodshot. I'm waiting on trailers myself.

  5. 1 hour ago, dudalb said:

    Actually the Solo Hulk film did not make back it's cost,so technically that is a flop, though the amount of money lost was not a lot.

    But yeah, If you are predicting a flop for Marvel studios I would not pick Thor 4. I think Shang-Chi is the most problematical film on the schedule,but even I would not care to predict it's going to flop. Someday, yeah, Marvel will have another flop...just the law of averages...but I would bet a lot it will not be Thor 4.

    Hulk underperformed no doubt. Flop it was not but we are likely dealing in semantics we aren't going to agree upon. 

    • Like 1
  6. 3 hours ago, AndyK said:

    I starting to think this could be Marvels first major flop.

    This statement feels vaguely familiar. Never been right in all the times I've heard it over the years but it keeps being said...like "we only have "x" years to save the planet". I suppose one day both will be true but not because of any correct prognosticating. 

     

     

    • Haha 1
  7. My wife saw her first trailer for this over the weekend. 

    She said, "Dora has her Learners Permit I see?"

    Yep, she is aged up a good 5yrs + over the cartoon.

    Then she saw Eugenio Derbez, whom we saw in the Overboard remake, and both felt he was great in that. I don't care what RT score says that film is a funny remake. Anyway she said, I'll see that at some point just for him.

     

    So at some point, probably over Winter Break(she is a school librarian) I may see this film.

  8. Haha, I'm the last post in this thread till my next post.

     

    I'm going to ask a question I know the most possible answer to so 14 replies saying the near certain answer isn't necessary. This is a question of sheer hypothetical in the other direction. 

     

    Using the ole "blockbuster" film must make 2 or 2.5x its budget to be successful (defined various ways depending on a film it seems) where does this put MIB: I at this point?

    Budget: $110

    WW to date: $247m

    Dom to date: $79m

     

    Poorly performing Domestic films have gotten sequels in recent memory with decent or great International receipts. Pacific Rim comes to mind right away.

    Men In Black International isn't doing poorly in the overall receipts tally. Bringing up Marketing costs is a red herring, we all know that is done in a different area and not a true factor to actually making/producing a blockbuster film. The studio handles that differently.

     

    Sony is hurting for solid franchises. MIB:I is their attempt to keep one of their few alive. Do they tweak the writing for another? Recast leads altogether and keep some ancillary cast for continuity? Let it lay fallow?

     

     

  9. 19 hours ago, Sanderson said:

    With so many duds in this franchise post T2, I'd kind of given up on this franchise ever being really good again.  It would be great if this one actually hit it out of the park.  Hell, I'd take getting on base so they could build off of this movie.  Every movie since T2 has been a failed reboot attempt.

     

    Maybe this is the one to do it!

    Incorrect

    Both T3(rotm) & T4(salvation) are linear extensions of the saga.

    Gynesis is the only hard reset and an attempt at a reboot. Recall they even told us it was the first in its own trilogy.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.