ban1o
-
Posts
5,791 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by ban1o
-
-
why is this still on the lot when it is essentially confirmed....
-
7 minutes ago, terrestrial said:
Only 20 votes for now, seems not a lot considering its so time-near to its release.
I now mostly counts for the big budgets so near to the release, small releases not considered as Oscar material usually get less reviews (in a big way less).
I have never heard about the character before stumbling over it here at BOT, curious to see where it all ends (ratings, audience, BO,...)
The cartoon was probably one of the biggest kids shows on tv for a while. But maybe it's not as popular in Europe.
-
1
-
-
.....Anyway to lighten this thread up this surprisingly has an 80% on RT. It might go down but that's a good sign. I wonder if this can beat Hobbs and Shaw next weekend?
-
18 minutes ago, JB33 said:
Ah. Would explain why I was completely unaware. I don't venture over to reddit. Hell I'm not on social media anymore! What a breath of fresh air!
One disturbing thing I have become aware of though is multiple people mentioning something about pedophile symbols on the movie poster. The only reason I'm not completely disregarding it is it just so happens I recently learned about the big, horrible secret in Hollywood right now: rampant pedophilia! I was led to the topic after watching a video on Youtube about the circumstances around Heath Ledger's death. I was so disturbed and emotional that night I couldn't sleep.
ummmm.......yeah I'm not a conspiracy person so yeah..moving on
-
On 8/6/2019 at 12:49 PM, JB33 said:
Who is doing that besides one critic?
Weirdos on social media are reddit are
-
On 8/6/2019 at 11:38 AM, BoxOfficeFangrl said:
Not really, how many movies these days star 7 year olds as the lead? In the later versions of the show, Dora is apparently 10-11 years old but you don't get that many movies starring kids that age either, especially not action movies. Lower budget comedies or awards dramas, maybe.
It might not have been a bad idea to make a movie cheap, have middle school-ish actors and if it's a success, they could've cranked out a sequel or two before Dora and friends are obviously adults. But a high school story is a safer bet to Hollywood. The Harry Potter movies probably only got to keep the characters as tweens when it started because the books were so popular already, and Rowling had a lot of power compared to most creators.
Yep. Percy Jackson for example aged up the characters when they made the movie. Movies like High school musical were aimed at kids but featured teenagers in the roles. It’s not something brand new.
-
I’m spending time with my 11 and 12 year old cousins and they are excited for this lol. They are begging me to take them to see it
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, CoolEric258 said:
Not this movie, but still interesting I guess. Gotta love Shaggy as Sebastian tho. This movie better get Sean Paul then. Dude would kill Under the Sea
Auli’i Cravalho was one of my fan castings for this movie. Love the casting!
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Movies4Life said:
Good thing the early Rotten Tomatoes Score is 60% Fresh. That can hopefully help the movie out in it’s opening weekend.
I think it will end up in the 60's or 70's. Based on the reviews it was better than the marketing and it's a fun adventure film. But I don't think good reviews will really help he film that much.
-
numbe
21 minutes ago, Rthroar said:I had been going with H&S 23.6, TLK 10.9
any numbers for OUATIH?
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, dudalb said:
Don't know much about what the British Army was like in 1940, do we?
ummm yes? what does that have to do with me finding it hard to differentiate between them? lol Just because it's accurate doesn't change that.
-
14 minutes ago, aabattery said:
Moderation:
Enough with the bootleg links.
booo!
SpoilerJust kidding by the way please don't ban me
-
1
-
-
I hope Goransson isn't just Zimmer-lite in this.
-
7 minutes ago, NamakFiskKa said:
Time for a new protagonist
*Cue to Washington*
thats a bit corny/racist ?
lol that's what I was saying. If Nolan wasn't known for his super white films I wouldn't think so but he is so it's super corny to me lmao. In context it make a bit more sense though since it's followed by "Time had come for a new kind of mission" also time might be a double entendre since it might be about time travel.
-
1
-
-
Dunkirk was good but I couldn't understand the British accents a third of time and it didn't really have characters to me. Also all the young white British guys with brown hair were sometimes hard to differentiate so that's actually my least fave Nolan movie lmao (I know ...petty reasons). This seems more up my alley. Seems Inception-esque which is my favorite Nolan film.
-
dang it I missed the trailer lol
-
26 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said:
probably means a fresh take on typical leading man archetypes. maybe his wife is alive. who knows.
lololol
-
lol Nolan I love you but this is so cringy
-
Dunkirk teaser
Interstellar teaser
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, keysersoze123 said:
I dont know why some posters ridicule all posts and call it a fake.
Nolan always likes to have early teaser that barely shows anything(TDK just had conversation between bruce/alfred plus joker laughter).
This is gonna be huge with supposed time travel connatation.
how can he have a tagline that says "be ready for a new protagonist" what does that even mean....that's so cringeworthy especially with John David as the lead...
-
"Be ready for a new protagonist?" lol this is so fake how can anyone believe this
-
2 hours ago, JB33 said:
Why can't people accept that many parts of Tarantino movies are tongue-in-cheek, including the Bruce Lee scene? It's a Tarantino movie! Why are we suddenly concerned about going by the book and painting a character exactly how their real self was. Again, it's a QT movie, not a biopic. People should repeat this to themselves over and over again before their daily outrage routines.
As for Bruce Lee's daughter or Sharon Tate's sister, same goes for them. Sure I can see why they'd be miffed - nobody wants to see their own family members how they weren't - but they have to know they can't take a QT movie too seriously in that regard. I'm sure they'll live (but they also know their displeasure will generate headlines and drama so there's that).
Tarantino fanboys are the worst: Exhibit B.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, PDC1987 said:
So did the entire theater I was in. People are just looking to bitch about something 24/7.
Yes god forbid the daughter and only living child of Bruce Lee complain about the her dead father being the punching bag comic relief in a movie. She's just bitching and moaning.
Honestly Tarantino fanboys are the worst. Shannon has been through enough but now she has to deal with opinions from people who feel they know better than her about her own father.
-
2
-
-
I would love to See Tarantino do horror. The ranch scene was great and gave glimpses of that (although it went on too long)
In the Heights l Warner Bros. l June 10, 2021 | Lin-Manuel Miranda failed to save us all!
in Box Office Discussion
Posted
lmao Jon Chu named his son after this movie. It better be good now. Imagine being named after a shit movie lol