Jump to content

TLK

Free Account+
  • Posts

    5,430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TLK

  1. 2 hours ago, titanic2187 said:

    If Downtown Abbey spin off movie can get 30m opening, there is no doubt a well made Game of throne movie can trigger 100m right?

    I am not so sure about that. Harry Potter was a bigger phenomena and even then only 3 of its movies crossed $100 million. Neither of the two prequels/spin-offs came close. None of the Hobbit movies did $100 million OW and , yes, I know a couple of them could've cleared $100 million if they were November openers.

     

    Edited to add - A Game of Thrones film will have to be R-rated for sure and that will further reduce the chances of $100 million OW.

  2. 43 minutes ago, Eric! said:

    Maleficent: Mistress of Evil Greater Philadelphia Area Seat Report T-34 and Counting

      Sellouts Showings Seats Sold Total Seats Perct Sold
    TOTALS 0 21 46 5,753 0.80%

     

    I don't have any comps for the time being (the only option I have is It 2, which...lol. The number's 1.6M btw). However, I do think this is a very mediocre start. Only a few theaters have actually sold anything, and three of them barely got into the double digits. Of course, it's more than a month away, so this is not a death sentence. But this should give some people pause.

     

    There is no reason why Maleficent should have great pre-sales a month out. I still see it as a $45-50 million opener (Down 30% from the first one) once Disney marketing kicks in..

  3. 13 hours ago, Ryan Reynolds said:

    find the trailer confusing, if you never saw The Shining , you may be lost what this movie is

    I was going to make the same point. Horror is a young-skewing genre and a lot of them are either not very familiar with The Shining or they don't care about it. I can understand why the first trailer had to showcase the link to The Shining but the second trailer should've been about the plot of this movie with no references to the Kubrick film. This is an interesting book on its own but the only memorable things in this trailer are the scenes from The Shining.

  4.  

    36 minutes ago, TalismanRing said:

    With 1.3k likes and 200 comments it doesn't indicate that many people watched the trailer.   Either 10,000 people watched it 1,500+ times each or

     

    The Flourishing Business of Fake YouTube Views

     

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/11/technology/youtube-fake-view-sellers.html

     

     

    I think they were using the trailers as online ads so you get a view but not likes or comments. A youtube trailer ad is much, much cheaper than a TV ad so it makes a lot of sense for smaller distributors.

    • Like 2
  5. 20th century fox trailers don't have a lot of views. Ford vs Ferrari has 5.5 million views. King's man has 6 million and so on. I don't think they promote their trailers like some other distributors do by running them as ads. That said I don't expect Ad Astra to come close to some other big SciFi movies. $20-25 million is a decent OW target if the reviews are good.

    • Like 1
  6. It will be interesting to see how the streaming battle unfolds over the next few years. Every single one of these companies is overpaying for its content as of now. 90% of Netflix's original content is mediocre with very little re-watch value. Every thing Apple has shown so far looks terrible so what are they spending 6 billions on ? Disney content is for kids and fanboys so they'll get a big boost early on but how long is it going to be sustainable at their price-point ?

    • Like 1
  7. 4 hours ago, Barnack said:

     

     

    Not sure about all those comp

     

    Specially Glass being a sequel in a very popular franchise and put it in a complete different category, Elysium was a much bigger movie(125M net budget, follow up to District 9 phenomenon director, Damon, $97m WW P&A), Upside a Kevin Hart in a often proven high concept.

     

    This is a upper echelon for low/lower echelon of mid budget adventure-horror-thriller with some star power assemble but not the first tier kind, the closest could be Gyllenhaal, Ferguson, Reynolds movie Life ? That was also horror-adventure-thriller type, not ideal release date, very similar budget range.

     

    I think another good comparison is Cloverfield. It also came out in January and did well. You don't know with Disney but the old 20th Century Fox would've been able to market a movie like this internationally.

  8. 2 minutes ago, filmlover said:

    That's not why it isn't going to the festivals. It isn't because it doesn't need them since it's had buzz from the moment it was announced. There's always a contender or two opening in December each year that skip the festivals (last year it was Vice, the year before it was The Post and Phantom Thread), and an adaptation of a beloved novel from an exciting director and a starry cast opening on Christmas Day is that kind of movie.

    Exciting director and starry cast don't guarantee great reviews. Critics are going to ask the question whether this remake is necessary and if the answer is no, their reviews will reflect it. I agree that the movie will make a lot of money but middling reviews in September aren't going to help the box office in December.

    • Like 1
  9. 8 hours ago, cannastop said:

    Oh hey turns out Saudi Arabia actually did allow movie theaters after all. In 2018 though.

     

    Also this:

     

    https://variety.com/2019/film/news/saudi-arabia-movie-theaters-invest-35-billion-dollars-1203180529/

     

    $35 billion for movie theaters.

    Its all PR. The main Hollywood interest in Saudi Arabia is to have Saudi money flow into movies as investment. SA is never going to be a significant movie market because it has a relatively small population and they are also very conservative. There just isn't going to be a lot of demand for Hollywood movies there.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.