Jump to content

TomCruiseTop

Three Account
  • Posts

    3,946
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by TomCruiseTop

  1. 8 minutes ago, Taruseth said:

    They can't Italy, Spain etc. can't take it.

    I share a close personal friend with Varoufakis, who I respect greatly, and we were having this exact discussion yesterday based on a conversation they were having. Basically, even YV seems to be of the opinion that some radical action must be taken and quickly. Whether that is allowing the Spain, Italy, Greece etc. to collapse and then working something else out down the line.

     

    That or they threaten to take the entire North with them down what path? Weimar v2 on one hand, or a recession so deep it might make 1929 look like a party? In times like these hard choices will have to be made.

     

    I just hope that these choices are made sooner rather than later, for the good of Europe, and for the box office of A2.

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 2
    • ...wtf 1
  2. Them going AWOL is troubling, I just hope that they are found and actually are both given up to the proper authorities and they get themselves some help. They seem to be spiralling and this could get even darker which I don't think anyone would wish to see.

  3. 41 minutes ago, ChipDerby said:

     

    Going to trial over a single line in an op-ed that DOES NOT NAME HIM is shoddy at BEST.

    I deal in family law and defamation will often come up, although in a very different setting. Often with the Mothers and Fathers making defamatory statements to the children. Now many of these statements never mention the name, nor the title of the subject being defamed. Not once have I ever seen any legal objection to those statements being admissible, even when provided by the children themselves. Now I've worked in the UK for the past 20 years but did a decade in the US and unless something has changed, so long as one can provide enough supporting evidence I've never seen any precedence that would again prevent a judge from at least hearing the trial.

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Deep Wang said:

     

    Authenticity?  Buddy, it's their opinion!  They want to compare it based on everything we've ever seen during second weekends.  You want to remove all context and keep it strictly based on +/-%.  Neither of you are 'wrong' and can compare it however you want. 

    This I totally agree on. Although I've made it clear in the past that I always prefer the hard numbers. The cold logic. I believe that for 'Box Office' cold hard facts are the most authentic method. I agree that is my opinion! 

     

    What dudlad was doing above is totally misstating the discussion! 

    • Sad 1
  5. 14 hours ago, dudalb said:

    I don't see why the extreme Avatar/Cameron fanboys have to dump on every other movie that looks as  if it might be a big hit.

     

    No one is dumping on Top Gun. Certainly not us. In fact I'm overjoyed at just how well it's doing. What is in question is the comparisons being made by forum users and the authenticity of said comparisons. Reread the conversation and that is patently clear. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.