Jump to content

titanic2187

Free Account+
  • Posts

    8,830
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by titanic2187

  1. 4 minutes ago, cannastop said:

    Should movies based on historical events count as "original" movies?

    yes, because they are original movie,but not original idea, in fact, some would say the 1st movie of the franchise like 1st harry potter, 1st twilight and so on could be considered as original even they are adapted from existing publication as we are saying original movie, but certainly they are not original idea 

  2. 28 minutes ago, Matrix4You said:

    Dory is crumbling fast with that 50% drop.  Relative to how it was looking a few days ago in regards to passing the 500 million mark, it is disappointing that Dory might fall short after being replaced with Pets.  Maybe bad WOM is starting to kick in.

    bad WOM? are you kidding me?
    it definitely doesn't match the finding nemo's quality, but certainly not generating bad WOM.....95%fresh rotten tomato,89% from audience, A for cinemascore, it even get A+ for girls, hyper hold across 3rd week, all of these are not at all the signal of bad WOM 

  3. 7 minutes ago, Cmasterclay said:

    Why in the world would SLOP be frontloaded? Sure, it was marketed well and all, but it's a very kid-centric movie with zero built in fanbase. It's not a sequel or Pixar movie. The fact that it might have an OD higher than Inside Out, considering that IO was an adult-skewed Pixar movie with amazing reviews, is insanity. The real breakout surprise of the summer- and I had it third in my summer game predictions. 

    you get the point, normally an original firm will have better legs.....

  4. 8 hours ago, Dan9 said:

    Goosebumps had previews this weekend so I'd make that my favourite, not too sure how much it made though. 

     

    In dollars SW7 on course for $185M+. If the exchange rate had been stable since its opening day it could easily have been over $190M... 

    i thought the revenue in dollar is based on the exchange rate of the 1st day release?? if that was the case, it would not be affected by the bad ER lately, am i right?

     

  5. 7 minutes ago, a2knet said:

    Irrespective of whether you like their films or not, Pixar's pre-TGD box office run was not at all over-rated. Just amazing consistency.

    They are averaging 250m dom despite TGD.

     

    Quality wise the 1st 11 movies definitely look more solid IMO than the recent 5 (with the exception of IO).

    But Dory again I think will be a very good film and will also be a huge grosser.

     

    Row Rank Title (click to view) Studio Gross / Theaters Opening / Theaters Date
    1 16 The Good Dinosaur BV   $120,127,639      3,749       $39,155,217        3,749        11/25/15
    2 2 Inside Out BV $356,461,711 4,158 $90,440,272 3,946 6/19/15
    3 5 Monsters University BV $268,492,764 4,004 $82,429,469 4,004 6/21/13
    4 10 Brave BV $237,283,207 4,164 $66,323,594 4,164 6/22/12
    5 14 Cars 2 BV $191,452,396 4,115 $66,135,507 4,115 6/24/11
    6 1 Toy Story 3 BV $415,004,880 4,028 $110,307,189 4,028 6/18/10
    7 4 Up BV $293,004,164 3,886 $68,108,790 3,766 5/29/09
    8 11 WALL-E BV $223,808,164 3,992 $63,087,526 3,992 6/27/08
    9 12 Ratatouille BV $206,445,654 3,940 $47,027,395 3,940 6/29/07
    10 9 Cars BV $244,082,982 3,988 $60,119,509 3,985 6/9/06
    11 6 The Incredibles BV $261,441,092 3,933 $70,467,623 3,933 11/5/04
    12 3 Finding Nemo BV $339,714,978 3,425 $70,251,710 3,374 5/30/03
    13 7 Monsters, Inc. BV $255,873,250 3,649 $62,577,067 3,237 11/2/01
    14 8 Toy Story 2 BV $245,852,179 3,257 $300,163 1 11/19/99
    15 15 A Bug's Life BV $162,798,565 2,773 $291,121 1 11/20/98
    16 13 Toy Story BV $191,796,233 2,574 $29,140,617 2,457 11/22/95
    TOTAL: $4,013,639,858 - - - -
    AVERAGE: $250,852,491 3,727 $57,885,173 3,293 -

     

    TGD and cars 2 are really a dark spot for pixar......

  6. hey,fellows.....i have a question about venezuela box office~
    is it true that venezuela's market grow that fast recently? I saw venezuela keep bring in up to more than $20m for mega-blockbuster in 2015,which is hardly seen from previous year. 

    Like it grossed $39m for furious 7 in 2015, which is unbelievable figure for me consider the population there is about 30m, anything wrong with the figure?   

  7. 17 hours ago, Zamor said:

    As Terrestrial (I think) asked, here we are with an important update:

     

    ALL TIME ITALY (ADMISSIONS)

    DEFINITIVE DATAS*

    TOP 20

     

    ADM - FILM - YEAR

     

    22.900.000 - DOCTOR ZHIVAGO - USA 1966

    21.810.000 - THE GODFATHER - USA 1972

    16.800.000 - THE TEN COMMANDAMENTS - USA 1957

    15.800.000 - 007 GOLDFINGER - USA/UK 1964

    15.707.723 - WAR AND PEACE - ITA/USA 1956

    15.624.000 - LAST TANGO IN PARIS - ITA/FRA 1972

    15.400.000 - BEN HUR - USA 1959

    14.800.000 - A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS - ITA 1964

    14.600.000 - TRINITY IS STILL MY NAME - ITA 1971

    14.550.000 - FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE - ITA 1965

    14.100.000 - 007 THUNDERBALL - USA/UK 1965

    13.707.000 - TITANIC - USA 1998

    13.617.148 - LA DOLCE VITA - ITA 1960

    13.215.653 - LE PETIT MONDE DE DON CAMILLO - ITA/FRA 1952

    13.170.322 - ULYSSES - ITA 1954

    12.850.375 - THE LEOPARD - ITA/FRA 1963

    12.600.000 - LOVE IS A MANY-SPLENDORED THING - USA 1955

    12.592.231 - BEAUTIFUL BUT DANGEROUS - ITA/FRA 1955

    11.756.327 - MALICIOUS - ITA 1973

    11.559.217 - MIRACLE OF MARCELLINO - ESP 1955

     

     

    * Waiting for SIAE to release numbers for Disney movies and "Gone with the wind".

    well, it appear that only Titanic be the only film that release in modern history was in the list

  8. 13 minutes ago, terrestrial said:

    Is Alice = Alice in Wonderland 2? Part 1 the only number I have found with a fast glance was $33m, do you happen to know if that was the final result?

    All the others seem to be part number .... of a franchise too, but I am not sure about all acronyms.

     

    Not entirely, it depends on the theme of the discussion, the reason someone looks that chart up.

    For a fast glance, sure, that is how it get used by nearly all.

    To do research, comparisons,... to get a real feel for how to interpret older releases to nowadays releases... not without explications. As in more than one. Including the 'is not directly comparable' line added.

    There is a reason why e.g. BOM adds the 're-released' sign to all of those titles that got one or more. If used that over-all like like you seem to assume, there wouldn't even be a need for that.

    IMHO = yes for chart hunters, and no for people who analyze and try to learn about the impact in its time in comparison to today's movie business.

    well, that's nothing in this world existed to be directly comparable, once you are released in different time frame, different year, different competitors, during demographic, different level of WOM, there wont be a directly comparison.

    We just need to ensure an as fair as comparison and including rerelease data into final nominal gross is certainly a fairer comparison. However, the number of times getting rereleased should also consider like GWTW and Snow white that getting multiplessssssssssssssssssssss rerelease is really against my argument. 

    But JP, star war 4,5,6,&1, titanic, well, that just re-released once or twice,so that shouldn't be a big problem in interpreting the movie performance, since we have neglected so many factor that work against them like the expansion of foreign market recently,inflation, and 3D-IMAX premium.     

  9. 7 hours ago, Ent said:

     

    It might thanks its second release for it.

     

    Wasn't it in the $1.8B before its 2012 rerelease ?

    personally, i think we should include 2012 re-release figure, and that is a common consensus across the board. 

    1) SW7 has 3D +IMAX advantage while titanic during 97 didnt have

    2) SW7 has China market which explode in recent year, in 97, china is still a very small market.

    Given that 2 huge difference, we should include 2012 figure into overall total, but i oppose to take in to account of adjusted inflation figure~ 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.