Jump to content

gadd

Free Account+
  • Posts

    521
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gadd

  1. 2 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said:

    they probably want to space out the Bong speeches. i'd assume it'd make more sense to give IFF early because it's a given. but they have presented the screenplay awards first sometimes in the past.

    True, but the last time they were this early was the year Spotlight and The Big Short won those categories and they were locks. Still, interesting change-up.

  2. 3 minutes ago, Valonqar said:

    Drama. The point is that it could go either way so you either get happy reunion a la SLP/Spike or WTF like when they lose.

     

    Portman is working with Waititi on Thor so it's a pretty safe choice to have her with Chalamet to present Adapted since it's a tossup between him and Gerwig for win. But maybe they are presenting Costume, in which case she has a tiny connection with Waitit's movie (Jojo is up for that too, against LW).

    It just seems to happen more often that it did before, but that's not surprising given we're in the age of social media where people crave talking points or memes.

  3. 9 minutes ago, filmlover said:

    Photos from the rehearsal reveal that Natalie Portman and Timothee Chalamet will be presenting together. Hopefully one of the Little Women categories so we can see his reaction if the movie either wins or loses lol.

    This is one of my pet peeves with the Oscars. Why get people who are, to varying extents, close with one of the nominees to present an award unless it's an absolute lock like Scorsese winning Director for The Departed? Sometimes it makes for a really nice moment like Matt Damon presenting Kenneth Lonergan with his Oscar or Samuel L. Jackson giving Spike Lee his one last year, but then you have occasions like Ansel Elgort and Eiza Gonzalez presenting the Sound categories which Baby Driver was up for, only for it not to win either of them.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  4. The preferential ballot has its problems, but if it weren't in place the Best Picture race wouldn't have been as open as it has over the last few years. I'm sticking with 1917 to win the big prize mostly because of its PGA win which demonstrates its strength on a preferential ballot. However, Parasite's SAG and WAG wins have shaped it as a strong alternative to 1917. 

    The identity of the Best Picture presenter has been kept closely under wraps according to reports from the rehearsal...

  5. As someone who mildly enjoyed the first two films, I had a great time with this one. Turns out that the best way to revitalize a popular franchise starring Will Smith is:

    a) Get Will Smith back

    b) Have a soul

    The action never surpasses the insanity of the second film but I felt like almost every other area of this movie saw an improvement - tone (more heartfelt), humor, music (Mark Mancina's theme being brought back made me so happy), secondary characters (especially the villains) and the overall story. It gave me a similar feeling to the one I had after <em>Fast Five</em>, where I went from being ambivalent about the franchise to eager for a follow-up.

  6. Just now, filmlover said:

    Also don't know if this has been mentioned already (probably has) but this is looking to be the most hit-heavy Best Picture line-up in a while? 1917, Ford v Ferrari, Joker, Little Women, and Once Upon a Time...in Hollywood all either have or will make over $100M totals. Good for ratings, I guess.

    Last year and this year's set of Best Picture nominees have made that Popular Film idea look even worse in hindsight.

  7. This reminds me of the 2010 and 2014 set of nominees whereby so many categories consist of Best Picture contenders when the individual branches could've gone for much more inspired choices (Screenplay, Acting, Costumes, Film Editing and Sound in particular). Thankfully, The Lighthouse's cinematography wasn't a victim of this.

    It hurts more when the likes of Awkwafina, Nyong'o and Lopez are recognised by their precursors just to give us hope before AMPAS delivers crushing disappointment. 

    All that being said, there's no Best Picture nominee in that line-up I had mixed or negative feelings towards (unlike last year) and given the way the race is shaping up I'll probably be satisfied with the majority of winners too.

     

    • Like 1
  8. 1 hour ago, Avatree said:

    Firstly yes there are two POC nominations, for Awkwafina (chinese or whatever she is) and Michael Ward (black), in the Rising Star award.

    Anyway why should the actor categories be non-white? Is it not possible that people just thought those 5 in each category were the best they had seen?

    You might also like to know that Parasite does not release until February and most people have not heard of it

     

    I could somewhat subscribe to that line of thinking if they hadn't nominated Robbie and Johansson TWICE, especially the former in the same category. This isn't an outlier either: BAFTA is notorious for overlooking some POC when it comes to big awards e.g. Denzel Washington never being nominated and Barry Jenkins failing to get a Director nomination for Moonlight. 

    I'm absolutely thrilled for Jessie Buckley. Her turn in Wild Rose is one of my top 5 favourite performances from an actress and I was also lucky to see her perform here in Dublin last June where she was brilliant. She has a bright future ahead of her.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.