WittyUsername
-
Posts
9,986 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by WittyUsername
-
-
TWoW was basically a reintroduction to the world of Pandora, but now that we got that out of the way, it’s time to up the ante.
-
3
-
-
11 minutes ago, The Dark Samurai said:
It's kind of incredible that after 34 MCU films, there's a very good chance the two highest grossing non-Avengers films will be Spider-Man: No Way Home and Deadpool & Wolverine.
Can you guess what both of those movies have in common?
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Krissykins said:
Hmm spotted the other motive behind your reaction lol.
That’s probably expected.
YouTube is the worst, as we know. So that has all the misogynistic “creators” and racist subscribers/commentors.
An area of Twitter will be hating on Gal Gadot because she’s a Zionist.
In the case of Gal Gadot, I do understand disliking her on the count of her views, but it’s weird to me how people are saying that the two seconds we heard of her in the teaser is further evidence of what a terrible actress she is. A lot of them even straight up seem to be mocking her accent.
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, Spidey Freak said:
I'm pretty sure NWH strongly hints at the MCU having their own set of Osborns with Dafoe's Norman saying something along the lines of, "I went to meet my son and he's..." before trailing off. I remember thinking if he was about to say black as that discovery shook his (probably racist) ass
He specifically said Oscorp doesn’t exist in that universe, and I don’t recall him suggesting that he met an alternate version of his son.
Anyway, Kevin Feige made it clear that they had no intention of using villains from past Spider-Man movies before they decided on the multiverse angle. Feige seems to consider actors like Willem Dafoe and Alfred Molina to be the definitive versions of their respective characters.
-
I would think that from Marvel’s perspective, Willem Dafoe was the MCU Norman.
-
Quite the dichotomy between YouTube and Twitter in terms of what they consider the worst thing about this. YouTube says it’s Rachel Zegler and Twitter says it’s Gal Gadot. They can’t please anyone, can they?
-
I wouldn’t expect James Gunn’s Superman to outgross The Batman, but even assuming it becomes a billion dollar hit, I can’t imagine that’ll be enough to solve WBD’s financial problems.
-
Well, the lions certainly look more expressive than the 2019 film.
-
Does anyone find it a little weird that they went through the trouble of giving Red Hulk visible chest hair?
-
-
-
A large part of why the company is in so much debt in the first place was because of the Discovery merger.
-
Seems like going all in on streaming has bitten both WB and Paramount in the butt.
-
The animation style’s actually growing on me. I’m glad they didn’t just take the obvious route and try to copy the Spider-Verse style.
-
1
-
-
Man, Barakapool was like a different lifetime.
-
If the next saga is the Mutants Saga, I could see them going with Mr. Sinister as their big villain. The Fox movies seemed like they were trying to build him up.
-
In terms of Marvel’s 2026 slate, my guess at this point is the following:
-February: Blade (there’s no way it keeps that November date)
-July: Spider-Man 4
November: Either Shang-Chi 2 or Doctor Strange 3
-
7 minutes ago, keysersoze123 said:
Hitchcock was terrible for sure. There were many things you could get away back then that is no go now. But I have not heard anything bad about Spielberg for sure. His has his share of controversies but I have not heard about him sexually harassing any actor.
There was a story about how Spielberg essentially waterboarded Susan Backlinie to get her to scream convincingly for the opening of Jaws.
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, Firepower said:
Kubrick would've been cancelled if he was still alive today for his The Shining shoot alone, this is mid compared to what Kubrick did to Shelly Duvall or what Hitchock did to some actresses like Tippi Hedren, people have very selective moral compass. Most old time directors are creeps by today's standards or have skelletons in a closet, even Spielberg has some rumors that could or could not be true.
To be clear, the idea that Stanley Kubrick tormented Shelly Duvall was debunked pretty extensively, including by Duvall herself. Kubrick was indeed a control freak who had some shady things about him, but this notion that he put Duvall through hell on that set isn’t actually true.
-
2
-
-
Well, there you have it then.
-
44 minutes ago, PlatnumRoyce said:
In an interview in early 2023, someone at Disney mentioned there were practical limitations to what they could do with Namor in Black Panther 2's marketing because of the character's contractual limitations. I wonder to what degree that's going to impact the "Hulk 2" aspects of this film as they were still able to do a pretty good amount with Atlantis in that film's marketing.
I thought I remembered hearing that Universal’s remaining rights to the Hulk lapsed last year on the 15th anniversary of the Edward Norton film. In any case, I don’t recall Marvel having any real problem advertising the Hulk in their past films.
-
14 hours ago, AniNate said:
Lmao. Premiering at Venice
I say good for Costner.
-
Assuming we don’t hear any extras come forward about being harassed or uncomfortable on set, then I don’t think it would be unreasonable to assume that certain bigwigs in Hollywood are trying to paint a particular narrative because they’re mad that Coppola made a movie outside the studio system. The trades were doing the same thing with American Horizon.
To be clear though, I don’t think Coppola is some kind of saint. What he did to Victor Salva’s victim was pretty scummy, but I don’t see the trades bringing that up.
-
5
-
-
SNOW WHITE | 03.21.2025 | Disney
in Box Office Discussion
Posted
The press tour with Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot is gonna be awkward, isn’t it?