Jump to content

HeadShot

Free Account+
  • Posts

    683
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HeadShot

  1. 1 hour ago, narniadis said:

    In his opinion  It will be a disaster since he has clearly made it plain that he expected 600m as the end goal. I think I have found another one to add to my ignore list since Id rather not be known for bad behavior consistently. 

    lol at putting people on ignore because they have a different opinion. You should move to China!

    • Like 1
  2. 1 minute ago, narniadis said:

    Ummmmmm your definition of huge needs a reassessment especially when you are trying to link some films over a 20 year spread or originals to remakes. 

    Your comparisons make your argument incompatible and your insistence on your view being the only accurate point versus actual data makes having a teaching conversation nearly impossible. 

    I mentioned several "newer" movies as well.  Just look at how Frozen II is smashing internationally. The increases are massive. There is no "cap". This was also supposed to happen domestically.  Something clearly didn't click. Stop fooling yourself.

    • Haha 1
    • ...wtf 1
  3. Just now, lorddemaxus said:

    How many sequels to breakouts in the past decade increased from their predecessors?

    Ultron -> Infinity war

    IW -> EG

    Homecoming -> FFH

    Hunger Game -> CF

    Lion King -> Lion King

    Furious 6 -> Furious 7 

    Jurassic Park III -> Jurassic World

    Harry Potter 7 -> Harry Potter 8

    Incredibles -> Incredibles 2 

    Finding Nemo -> Finding Dory

    Jumanji -> Jumanji 2

    Star Wars: Revenge of sith -> TFA

    Despicable Me -> Despicable me 2

     

    etc.

     

     

     

     

     

  4. 4 minutes ago, a2k said:

    no thnaksgiving animation apart from frozen has even done 300 dom. sing and grinch with 270+ are the next biggest. disney's next biggest is moana. (TS2 1999 adjusted would be the biggest but in that era cg animation was itself a rarity)

     

    400 for frozen's story-line could be closer to saturation than it's getting credit for.

    I don't believe in saturation when it comes to what time in the year a movie is released. We have already seen studios do insane numbers in unusual months like black panther in February. If a brand/movie is big enough people will go see it no matter what. 

     

     

  5. Just now, narniadis said:

    Case in point of why people get disappointed at the box office results. Trying really hard to not get another warning here 🤦‍♂️ 

    "Only" 400m.... that comment alone shows a distinct lack of understanding both for how box office operates and for WHY Frozen 1 hit the mark and WHY its automatically more difficult for the sequel to repeat the behavior. 

    400 million is a huge number but the brand has grown so much over the years. I expected Frozen to outdo or at least match Incredibles 2.

    • Like 1
  6. 1 minute ago, a2k said:

    gotg1 to gotg2 growth gives 468.

    smh to ffh growth gives 465-466.

    even aou to aiw's growth gives frozen2 592-593.

    never-mind easily.

    Frozen is a bigger brand than GOTG and Spider-Man (spider-man's boxoffice got hurt by so many reboots).

     

    592-593 would have been a great number as well. But clearly it's not reaching that. 

  7. 7 minutes ago, narniadis said:

    @a2k CF is the only #2 sequel to increase from a part 1 that did over 400m. Thats partially what I referr to when I mention the 400m curse / pattern. Not saying that other films have done badly but case in point Ultron and JW2 while still doing well over 400m didnt come close, same with Jedi. And that goes back all the way to Spiderman in 2002 (first 400m film with a sequel.) 

    Obviously inflation and other issues play a part, but again, when only 2 animated films ever have legitimately crossed 450m (3 if you want to throw Shrek 2 in there) the expectations of Frozen 2 hitting the lighting twice was setting up for disappointment, esp the 500m+ camp. 

     

    Not saying 500m isnt warranted, but hitting 450m is a positive not a negative in reality. 

    These movies were insanely massive and which made it hard for them to surpass their predecessor. Did anyone expect The Last Jedi to do over 1 billion domestically?  Marvel ain't probably ever surpassing End Game either.  Frozen on the other hand "only" did 400 million domestically. It could have easily increased with at least 200 million. 

  8. 1 hour ago, a2k said:

    how many 400+ dom grossers have sequels that do bigger. especially outside Avengers 3/4.

    i think CF was the first one ever to pull that off. TS4 did it this year too. 

    even back to back 400+ movies in a franchise are handful.

    485 would be 21% over 400 and even if you were expecting 525+ it isn't awful.

    We live in a franchise world now. It's a very different climate. Sequels nowadays are expected to increase and grow due to brand recognition. And Frozen is one of the biggest brands of this decade. It should have easily done 600 million domestically. Like Charlie said its scoring 75 instead of 90. 

    1 hour ago, titanic2187 said:

    I am glad TLK didn't cross 2b.

     

    I do not wish to see 2b ww club got cheapen this easily like what happened to 1b club now. 

    It was already cheapened when Titanic cheated it's way in there with a re-release. 

    • ...wtf 1
  9. 12 minutes ago, cdsacken said:

    It's going to make a tony of money. It's not a bomb. Don't be ridiculous.

     

    On another note, Joker is gonna push for 1.05 billion, 250 million above basically every optimistic estimate. People laughed at the 300m domestic club, now even a 350m club wouldn't have looked silly.

    yeah i know it's gonna make money but let's not pretend like we are were expecting much bigger numbers.  Me calling it a bomb was just hyperbole anyways.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.