HeadShot
-
Posts
683 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by HeadShot
-
-
18 minutes ago, Water Bottle said:
That was the case for the first year or so after it came out. But it's been six years lol. I haven't seen a little kid with Frozen merch or anything in years.
I still see it all the time. We need @Barnack to help out and post Frozen merch charts
-
1 minute ago, Water Bottle said:
Do you hang around areas where people talk about kids films like Zootopia? Like the people I frequent with didn't mention Frozen until marketing for this movie started to ramp up.
Except Frozen has been everywhere since 2013. You can't exit the house without seeing some little kid with Frozen merch. Anyways I'm not saying that I'm right. It's all based on a subjective feeling.
-
1 minute ago, MrFanaticGuy34 said:
Nah. The difference between Zootopia & SLOP, is that the former was insanely beloved by everyone who saw that film and it’s $1.023B WW proves that. Zootopia is still fondly remembered even you this day.
Is it though? I mean it was a cute movie but that's about it . I might be wrong but I just haven't seen Zootopia mentioned anywhere for years now.
-
-
Does anyone have nostalgia for Shrek? It feels like a product of it's time. Not something that's beloved like a classic Disney movie.
-
Zootopia 2 will pull a "Secret life of pets 2"
-
3 minutes ago, Jedi Jat said:
Going for $43mn Approx True Friday for now.
Good numbers
-
2 minutes ago, Nova said:
Only $8.5M? Elsa and Anna deserve better. The American public have failed them. Somebody call the FBI. There needs to be an investigation into this matter ASAP.
-
1
-
-
I really thought this was going to demolish Incredibles 2. Damn 120 would be a disaster.
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
-
47 minutes ago, Jedi Jat said:
East Cost: Good Early Numbers.
we need amazing/insane though
-
1
-
-
cometh' the apocalypse
-
1 minute ago, EarlyDeadlinePredictions said:
I prefer the futuristic vibe and grumpy old man Bruce. Terry is a cool protagonist as well.
I'll add it to my watch list as well then.
-
2 minutes ago, TMP said:
It's aged pretty bad, tried to watch it again a few years ago and it wasn't anywhere near as good as I remembered. Ditto the 90's Spider-Man cartoon. The Batman one was good though
Glad to hear that I'm not the only one that feels this way. I never watched it as a kid so I don't have any nostalgia for it. I'll still probably finish it. Good thing you told me about Spider-man lol - that was next on my watch list. Guess I'll skip it and go straight to Batman.
1 minute ago, EarlyDeadlinePredictions said:Batman Beyond >>> All other animated CBM shows.
Isn't Batman: The Animated series better?
-
1
-
-
Watched X-Men animated series season 1 on Disney+ for the first time.. It's not as amazing as people claim. A lot of characters backstory are left untold (magneto, juggernaut, prof x etc) and they don't do a good job explaining their different powers. Perhaps season 2 will improve.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, WittyUsername said:
Is Joker not a global event?
In some countries in Europe? Sure.. Other than that - hell no. It's not even close to the level of LOTR. It's an insulting comparison.
-
2 hours ago, MrGlass2 said:
That's the problem when your $1 billion+ movie is winning major awards.
Hard to blame them for not knowing how to handle popular and awards success at the same time, that is a situation almost unheard of since LOTR.
Not really. Black Panther - a more acclaimed movie than the taxi driver rip-off Joker - was was nominated for all major awards and they still kept mentioning the sequel (even during their SAG acceptance speech).
Also LOL at comparing Joker a measly 1 billion grosser to the global event that was LOTR.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, WittyUsername said:
I don’t know who to believe at this point.
read: they are pretending that there will be no sequels until the oscars are done.
-
1 hour ago, titanic2187 said:
It is worth to mention after all this years, Frozen is still the 3rd biggest original film of all time, after Avatar & Titainc
it is worth noting that after all these weeks, Lion King is still the biggest film starring LIONS of all time.
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
44 minutes ago, WittyUsername said:
This news about WB developing a sequel to Joker is extremely disappointing. Why can’t anything be allowed to stand on its own anymore? It’s only a matter of time before we get a Batman 4.
you're surprised that a major studio is developing a sequel for a movie that profited more than infinity war? LMAO.
-
37 minutes ago, MrGlass2 said:
Absolutely nobody could have predicted that it would make more profits than Infinity War. And you, obviously, have no idea how movies are financed - you literally just found out about co-financing because of Joker. It is hilarious.
I know how co-financing works. 50% is ridiculous to give up.
-
2 minutes ago, lorddemaxus said:
Almost every studio cofinances pretty much all their movies. The only studio that doesn't is Disney. WB should still be getting a good profit out of this and it also means they can maintain a pretty good relationship with the co-financiers. And awards campaigns cost 30 mil max.
Co-financing 50% was a stupid movie. It's budget was minimal. There was no way it was going to lose money.
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, RealLyre said:
I agree, WB knew this was gonna make a billion from day 1 so they should've just given Philips an upfront pay instead of a back-end deal %. he already pulled that trick on them with the hangover 10 years ago
WB never learns. they even co-financed this film by 50% (despite this film being a non-risky sure hit) so their profits are also less. if only they had been smarter.
They are so stupid lol. But it's not surprising coming from the studio that tanked Harry Potter and DC.
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, lorddemaxus said:
What? I get that you hate it when Todd Philips succeeds but that has nothing to do with the rest of what you said. Plus WB had probably earned more from Joker than any studio has this year from a single movie except for Endgame.
They co-financed the movie (what a dumb decision) and will be getting only 50% of the earnings. Todd Phillips getting 100 million - so that leaves even less money for WB. I read that they'll finance all of the awards campaigning as well - which will be costly.
-
Todd Phillips getting 100 million for the Joker. LOL Warner Bombs really fails even when they succeed. They could have earned so much more had they been smarter.
Fanboy Wars Thread: Personal Attacks not allowed | With Digital Fur Technology
in Box Office Discussion
Posted
DR. Harley Quinn an air head?