MightyDargon
-
Posts
996 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by MightyDargon
-
-
6 minutes ago, ringedmortality said:
Twisters can't come soon enough honestly, depressing year so far.
You seriously think Twisters is the most anticipated movie of the year? That's what's sad.
-
1 minute ago, emoviefan said:
Like Oppenheimer and DR:Part 1 last year. The audience overlap was massive. The rating made no difference. DR;Part 1 could have held much better if it only had Barbie in that second weekend. And those had the same rating PG-13 but completely different core audiences.
...There was probably some overlap with Barbie as well. You don't get to be 600 million release by leaving a lot of cash on the table, even if Barbie's audience was mostly female.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, AJG said:
“Animated Disney Movie For ‘Older Audiences’ Declares Online Forum”It shares a lot of its audience with Furiosa. Why is this so fucking hard for you people to believe?
-
11 minutes ago, AnthonyJPHer said:
There is a massive difference. R-Rated films are restrictive, PG-13 films are more widely available to people.The audience for Apes is mainly older and has substantial overlap with the Mad Max one.
-
3 minutes ago, emoviefan said:
8:00 on Friday morning and this thread is already 4 pages deep and 60 comments. At least the hysterical doom and gloom about the RT audience score has died down.
I don't think most people beyond this forum actually care about the RT audience score.
-
Where the heck do we get Civil War stats. Does A24 not report daily?
-
38 minutes ago, AnthonyJPHer said:
Furiosa is R-rated, in two weeks, and I don’t think it would overlap much. I think the two would coexist rather than destroy one another.I seriously don't get what the difference is except at the very margins. Apes is very much an "older audiences PG-13"
-
Just now, AnthonyJPHer said:
I’d could argue it might see a bigger multiplier than War because War was destroyed by competition in summer 2017 and summer 2024 isn’t nearly as packed. Heck, the only PG-13 blockbuster after Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes is Twisters in July in 10 weeks.
If it holds well throughout the weekend and it doesn’t collapse next week, I could see 150m+.
Eh, it DOES have significant competition from Furiosa.
-
3 minutes ago, vale9001 said:
did Hemsworth ever open a movie is not Thor?
Snow White and the Huntsman?
-
4 minutes ago, AJG said:
There’s been 10 Apes movies. A musical. 2 reboots. A TV show, and a kids cartoon. I don’t know what more we’re meant to get out of this.10 Apes movies since the late 60s is not really that much. There isn't THAT much Apes material at any given time, even if it has accumulated over the years. It's not like they were trying to run multiple Ape series at once or do Into the Caesarverse or something.
-
3 minutes ago, filmlover said:
$50M+ very much likely now. Planet of the Apes continues to be a consistent, rather undervalued IP.
Best it remain undervalued tbh or we'll get a million spinoffs that will dilute the value. Even Monsterverse would push it if they did 3 series at once like Marvel does.
-
Just now, AniNate said:
Civil War was fairly accurate, it was just that a B- actually did mean something like a B-
No, it wasn't accurate at all. The movie didn't actually perform like a B-. I believe Flash was a B and that held very poorly. People here have a million excuses as to treating a Cinemascore like it's the tablets Moses took down when it's a very scattershot projection at best.
-
Again, Cinemascore is not actually a great predictor of WOM unless it's over A- or below B.
We literally just went through this with Civil War, and y'all did not learn the lesson yet.
-
2
-
-
8 minutes ago, AniNate said:
Regardless of the cinemascore what I said above should still be a consideration. Think there is something of a rush factor here, especially since it's the first real "tentpole" movie of the summer, and I wouldn't be surprised by GxK legs
Yeah, that makes sense.
-
People on here have a weird tendency to think "Cinemascore=gross" which isn't really true unless the movie in question gets an A (which is quite rare)
-
....if we're going by IMDB or Letterboxd, it really doesn't look low.
I never trust RT audience scores anyway.
-
3 minutes ago, WorkingonaName said:
I refuse to watch any Mad Max movie where a non-aussie plays a leading role.
So you refuse to watch any Max Max movie? That's nice to know.
-
2
-
3
-
-
7 minutes ago, ChipDerby said:
My best guess based on everyone's numbers here would be a straight up $5.0 mil in previews, before adding in early shows.
Which movie are you talking about?
-
The biggest problem with this movie, simply from watching the trailer, is that it doesn't look visually distinct from Lion King 2019. It's not that it looks "bad" per se in terms of VFX but a lot of it looks very similar to scenes and visuals from the 2019 film without a "hook" to stand out.
-
Looks like the actual review score will hover somewhere in the low 80s, which is solid overall.
-
The "bad review" thing was a theory more based on Sneider's claim than actual latency.
-
Do we have a number for Civil War?
-
I'm convinced the "bad review advance notice" was because Sneider's fee fees were hurt by Disney.
-
3
-
-
There's not that much to "bulldoze" in terms of Fall Guy audience though. Unless it somehow started to draw mainly young people (as opposed to the anecdotal reports the audience was old)
Weekend Numbers | actuals | 58.40M KINGDOM OF THE PLANET OF THE APES | 13.70M THE FALL GUY | 4.38M CHALLENGERS | TAROT
in Numbers and Data
Posted
Your taste is awful.