alisson23

Don't get me wrong, I liked GotG, but when I watched the movie, it didn't look a big risk. It was Iron Man and his family in space. A big risk it was Iron Man. Marvel could to loose everything. Without the success of IM, we never would have seen these movies. If Guardians flopped, they only would move on with the universe.

Someone said here Guardians 1 it was a big risk. Well, every movie is a risk, but I don't think Guardians was a too big risk how people says. Superheroes movies it was big already back to 2013 and I'm sure Iron man 3 gave them more confidence about the next superheroes movies. Even if Guardians "flopped", it would make somenthing like 400m WW and to me, Marvel wasn't expecting a big profit in first movie. I believe they were expecting in the second and the next ones (after put them in a Avengers movie) how happened with Thor and Captain America. Guardians it was a necessary and inevitable movie for the brand because they need some new characters. They didn't have too much to loose. So, it was a risk, but not big at all. The big risk Marvel had it was Iron Man back to 2008. This is my opinion.

Sorry. Ok, thanks. Let's move on.

Ignore my replies to rucaio and tele, please.

I think something should have happened already when he called me an asshole. Moderation edited his post, but nothing more happened because he keeps provoking me. But ok, I will wait. Thanks for your feedback.

It isn't too hard surpass it. I loved Thor 3 trailer, btw. I hope it is good.

You should quote the people which said that. No need to shades in a discussion forum.

I'm not going to answer a post as disrespectful as this. Shame on you.

The point is the merit is for Illumination, not Universal.

"Brands need some "originality", something new to keep itself. For example, WDAS needs to do original things like Zootopia and Moana because they will not make a sequel to the "failed" movies it had before Frozen." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/frozen-2-plot-release-date-songs-plus-everything-else-need/

What an arrogant post. Disappointing. Nobody said that animations are not original. Read the post above yours. I think you're misinterpreting things Tomorrowland was a bad movie, but at least they tried something new. I want to see Disney to put so much "effort" they put into their franchises to make a good original movie. Why do they are sucessfull with franchise movies, but aren't with original movies ?? Do they don't know how to pleasure audience??

I give my support to these movies whenever I can. Even Tomorrowland I watched in cinema. No, I did not watch these disney movies last year, I didn't realize they were released here. Several?? Disney had 3 movies this past year. These films had limited release and a nonexistent marketing here. Disney didn't mind giving a decent release to them. I don't know if Disney repeated the "strategy" of domestic release here or if it got sloppy here after those films flopped domestically. Where did you get that animations can not be original ?? I did not say that. I said about brands. Like Marvel, Pixar and WDAS are big brands. Brands need some "originality", something new to keep itself. For example, WDAS needs to do original things like Zootopia and Moana because they will not make a sequel to the "failed" movies it had before Frozen. DISNEY does not merit by the originality of the BRANDS. For me, saying that Disney is original because it releases Pixar or WDAS movies is the same as saying that Universal has "originality" because it releases an original movie of Legendary or Illumination.

GO wasn't released here still. Well, nothing is 100% original. But there are movies try something.

I think you didn't understand the point of this topic still. There's no problem for living doing nostalgic movies, but why not to do "original" things TOO? To give a small chance for new ideas like Get out, A cure for wellness, Arrival... not only focus on brands...

a2net, you are so Disney. Give us an original contribution like @grey ghost gave, please.

Great post. I agree with you but I think Disney should to do the 2 things. They have enough money to do both, original movies and explore its franchises. I like many unoriginal movies they do, but come on, let's give a chance for new things too. No problem. Nice!

2 ORIGINAL comedies. Geostorm is "original" too, I guess. Dunkirk has Nolan, and...?? What's the problem? At least Warner is trying. I don't see Disney trying/giving its contribution.

English is not my first language. The most appropriate word in Portuguese has no English translation. I believe that the adjective "lazy" serves to define "a company that wants to enrich (more), but does not take big risks". (Read first post) If you have any word that define this better in English, you can tell me. Also, I put a (???) for us to discuss here. It would be great to see arguments.

So says you. Interesting, this little event didn't help too much the masterpiece Cap 2 in OW (The best MCU sequel pos Avengers IMO) even with a 4-day weekend. Okay, both Thor 1 and Cap 1 were meh movies, but Guardians 1 was highly acclamaied.

???? So do you think they are right stoping with original movies because they flopped? They don't need to do a original movie with 200m. This year we had some "original" movies like Get out, A cure for wellness, Going to Style, A dog's purpuse (ok, is a adaptation, but not a remake), Fist Fight... From Disney? No.

Sad but true. But this isn't a reason for not release a non brand/original movie. Warner and Uni have brands/franchises, for example. But they release new small movies every year.

I agree. It looks Disney doesn't want to has risks anymore. Every movie is from a brand or a remake now. I miss the times of Torrowland (bad movie, but bold move) and John Carter. Yeah, Disney wanted a franchise with those movies, but at least they tried something risk. Okay, I not saying Disney need spends 200m in a only original movie, but they need to do something out of brands. Some original, small movies...

Life was a tribute to acclaimed science-fiction film Gravity and Alien. Still, a original tribute, IMO. Even so, there are others original movies I have said.

Okay, I forgot that, still, there are many others movies.

It was a irony, there's nothing original in that movie. I was really shocked after I watched it because I don't believe it had good reviews from professional critics.