Legion Again
-
Posts
22,399 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
17
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by Legion Again
-
-
27 minutes ago, charlie Jatinder said:
Remove 8M off it I will still take it as a good result considering Hollywood trades were expecting $25-30M 5 days just a few days back.
I try not to anchor to HW trades either, they run a little wild in the other direction 🤣
But yeah even a 40M debut would have been pretty good, the previous pandemic record 5-day cume was presumably WW84 with half that.
-
19 minutes ago, charlie Jatinder said:
Here's a case. COVID outside China mostly become a news in Mar 13-15 weekend. Would you prefer this film releasing on Mar 6 2020 and getting 10 days of run in most market and delayed release in China in August 2020 or July 2021 release.
From a “when do I personally get to see it” perspective, definitely March 2020. But from a “want big BO numbers” perspective, def July 21.
-
1 hour ago, Borobudur said:
Actually I am little bit disappointed with <50m for 5 days. Obviously this is the first 20m, 30m opener since pandemic begin but I was so hyped for 50m 5 days since there are multiple predictions here that peg that number at >50m. Seeing the movie achieving lesser is just not satisfying enough.
As the original conductor of the 50M train (I called for it back in February) I consider this an absolute win. Especially with LA delaying their 50%. It’s a very very very strong result, try not to anchor to the higher end of BOT chatter which can run a little wild.
- 6
-
11 minutes ago, keysersoze123 said:
MTC1 will drop hard tomorrow as many theatres go offline for weekdays. Only plus point will be LA county will start to allow 50% occupancy. Still I expect it to drop 70% while MTC2 will hold much better. But overall drop wont be that good as you expect.
I suspect those MTC1s are not too important to gross. Sun-Mon drops have been pretty normal looking across the market for the last many Mondays.
- 1
-
So about 31.8 3 day 48 5-day.
Still a rock solid result, if it goes like 3.8 Mon for 52 cume, add 13x Mon would be like 101 still. So passing KOTM DOM may be up in the air for a while.
On the other hand, no competition upcoming, good reception, solid legs wouldn’t surprise me.
-
Lol. BW opening week> GvK and Shang-Chi opening week over GvK.
Not a knock on GvK at all, which is doing gangbusters. But it is still April, covid impacts are large. Covid impacts July and Sep basically zilch, would be unsurprising to see inflated grosses around then from socializing boom.
- 5
-
5 minutes ago, keysersoze123 said:
I am thinking 7.7m Sunday
To be clear, with or without PWP?
38% would be a pretty big Easter Sun drop though I guess Jat did warn about lack of Canada.
-
12 minutes ago, Menor said:
Yeah, you're right there. Not many options for May. I think the May numbers will really undersell what BO potential is actually there at that time in the market, as unless you're a horror person it'll be very barren. Makes the Black Widow move even more annoying.
May will probably be at like 70% of “normal” in terms of potential, but do like 20% of normal because no product. Oh well.
- 1
-
If they work something out for Cruella (and I certainly imagine they will, having concessions again in most places will only aid that) then we can assume BW is on track as well. If they don’t work something out for Cruella... well, they probably still will for BW. Much bigger movie with 6 extra weeks to hash things out.
- 1
-
4 minutes ago, keysersoze123 said:
They wont play the movie losing money.
Sure, agree with that. But they will play the movie making less money than they’d like.
5 minutes ago, keysersoze123 said:AMC/Cinemark will survive with studios that play ball.
Like I said at the top of this page, don’t really see how. Seems like wishful thinking.
I do agree that not working out a deal would be a mutual loss, which is why I fully expect a deal will work beworked out.- 2
-
16 minutes ago, Eric #TeamKong said:
That right there is my major problem. The idea that a greedy company that is clearly not starved for money is justified in bullying exhibitors, which despite being in it for the money, is struggling to get by and is the only reason said greedy company is popular in the first place, just because they make popular movies people like...that does not bother you? You really don't think they should compromise, throw a bone, or be a touch nicer? You don't think this is a major problem with our broken and toxic capitalist system? You really don't think this is an issue, even a little bit?
And I guess this is the other area of disagreement. No, I don’t really. I don’t see much reason to root for the less powerful corporations just because they’re less powerful. If the more powerful one is contributing more to my consumer satisfaction, I’ll happily keep rooting for them (and this applies to studio vs studio or studio vs exhibitor sentiment). There’s a sort of American notion of “the virtue of the underdog” that doesn’t really connect with me emotionally.
If exhibitors had a bunch of leverage over Disney who was struggling, they would “bully” Disney. If WB had a bunch of leverage over theaters they’d “bully” theaters, and if they had a bunch of leverage over Disney they’d “bully” Disney. I’m pretty much fine with all of that, it’s part of a broader system that is imperfect but which has delivered me a pretty high quality of life overall and to which I know no clearly superior alternative.
- 1
-
10 minutes ago, Eric #TeamKong said:
However, the big issue here is the idea you are saying here that theaters should just put up with awful deals and demands from a major company with more money than God. The idea that Disney, one of the biggest media companies in history with hundreds, if not thousands of revenue sources, not only has to make deals for one revenue source that strongly favors them, but you encourage and believe the opposing team should just go with it?
Okay, I think this might be where we’ve been talking past each other. I’m not saying, and do not believe, that theaters “should” do that in some kind of moral sense, like “I like Disney more than I like AMC and for that reason AMC should just roll over.”
I’m saying that they “should” agree to Disney’s demands in a strategic sense, because of where the relative leverage is. But I don’t expect and wouldn’t advocate for theaters to accept anything that's one cent more generous to Disney than circumstances force them into.
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Menor said:
I agree with most of this but I would say that plenty of people enjoy the theater experience, and much of that is created by chain theaters since indies are a pretty small component.
Sure, I wouldn’t say that they have no value. I enjoy Thursday night IMAX at the local Cinemark and would be sad if they all just up and vanished. I would prefer and fully expect mutually beneficially resolution to this, which is exactly what you “should” get when different self-interested entities interact.
But movies without theaters are still good. I liked Palm Springs. I loved The Incredibles, never seen in it a theater, probably never will. And on and on.
Theaters without movies... not much of a value proposition.
So it’s just a fundamentally asymmetrical situation 🤷♂️
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, Eric #TeamKong said:
Well then you should find what you said in the Raya thread to be very ridiculous
Uhhh... no? I honestly don’t see what you’re trying to get at here — that quote of mine from the Raya thread is very in line with my point here.
All studios are basically being driven by a combo of tradition, ego, and maximizing their own profit. All exhibitors, same thing applies. Trying to act like some corporations are being “nice” or being “mean” or that some are “good guys” and some are “bad guys” is just silly/naive (to be clear, I’m not fully agreeing with Fullbuster here).
But being aware of that corporate reality doesn’t mean consumers can’t like some corporations more than others. Disney actually creates products that a huge swath of people enjoy. So do WB, Uni, Sony, etc.
Cinemark, AMC,... not so much. So I think it’s pretty easy to see why people would feel more affinity for studios than chains, without needing a nonsensical moralizing component in either direction.
- 3
-
Other studios aren’t out here giving exhibition better deals out of the kindness of their hearts or something, it’s because they don’t have the leverage to drive harder ones. If they did, they would. That’s their fiduciary duty, and that’s how things are gonna be until the socialist revolution succeeds or whatever.
- 3
-
2 minutes ago, Eric #TeamKong said:
And don't even start with this whole "well all companies are greedy lol" because that's just a bunch of "both sides"-ism nonsense people do because they get upset when their massive corporation they stan for is mildly jabbed upon by online forums and Redditors
Talk about “most ridiculous thing I’ve ever read.”
- 5
-
7 minutes ago, lorddemaxus said:
Disney pivoting completely to streaming won't cause theaters to collapse though
If you look at the admits numbers the nonDis are able to pull the last decade, compared to theatrical profit margins, I have a hard time seeing how they wouldn’t. I mean, I guess to be clear I should say that I don’t mean “collapse” to like, 0 locations — but serious serious contraction where at least one MTC goes under.
9 minutes ago, lorddemaxus said:And Disney becoming Netflix 2.0 just due to theaters playing hardball is extremely unlikely too.
Oh, I totally agree. Because theaters need to come to an understanding with them about maintaining a future for Dis in theatrical, and so they will.
9 minutes ago, lorddemaxus said:Disney's ecosystem needs theaters.
Disney’s present ecosystem needs theaters, but in the medium-long run it seems like they’ll only want theaters.
- 4
-
Like, yes, theaters are hurting bad. That”s the reason they’ll have to agree to Disney’s terms, not somehow a reason that they can try to boycott the biggest studio by far.
- 5
-
10 minutes ago, keysersoze123 said:
As things stand Disney has to yield.
This just isn’t true, If both sides play hardball Disney pivots (even faster) to being Netflix 2.0. And theaters collapse.
- 2
-
36 minutes ago, titanic2187 said:
Japanese trying really hard to top 800 for the 2020 crown, only to have BOM fucked up their exchange rate over the course of its long run and miss out some notable market like Taiwan.
Mojo ER mistakes don’t matter for actual crown. It’s locked.
-
Even if AMC refused to show this it would crush 25/75 though, lmao.
-
2 minutes ago, VenomXXR said:
25/75 what?
OW/ DOM total, pretty sure
- 3
-
Gonna need this to at least outopen AM&tW. Not convinced 100 is off the table.
- 1
-
Feeling GvK OS>KOTM WW
The Box Office Buzz and Tracking Thread: Electric Boogaloo
in Numbers and Data
Posted
I also thought Regal would more seriously reopen when I originally went for 50. I think without LA artificially delaying and wider Regal penetration we would have 50+ easily.