Horner
-
Posts
627 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by Horner
-
-
No Chucky is a child's toy that houses the spirit of a dead guy. 🙄
-
1
-
-
It's a wrap!
https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344
https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/ https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 https://twitter.com/SecretsOfDune/status/1153688688615993344 status/1153688688615993344
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
4 hours ago, dudalb said:
You know the chances of that happening are about zero?
Oh yeah.
-
2 hours ago, dudalb said:
Doom is a great,great, villain, but I think Feige is going to be cautious about giving a villain a solo film.
I'd be willing to "settle" for an Ascension of Doom style series showing a rise to power in Latveria on Disney+ as a prelude to him being the antagonist in another character's movie.
-
1 hour ago, WhiteWings said:
I think she had become unhappy with the role because of a directorial change? Can't remember.
Yeah. Patty Jenkins was lined up to direct Thor 2, didn't think the script was very good and wanted to do a different take, Marvel wouldn't budge so she walked.
-
1
-
-
18 minutes ago, Blaze Heatnix said:
It seems it got a February release date
And they still have the original date in the banner.
-
2 hours ago, IronJimbo said:
James Cameron's Avatar 2 - distributed by Disney
Promoted by them as well, no?
-
2 hours ago, Spidey Freak said:
Neil Gaiman run.
That's the only run I'm familiar with as well. And it's supposedly the one they're leaning on the most for the movie. And it makes sense, if you're trying to set up an entire group of enhanced beings who've been around in the MCU all this time but never got involved in any of it's goings on. The Gaiman run would work quite well for that.
-
-
6 hours ago, Valonqar said:
she was up for Piper (whoever that is).
The casting sheet makes it sound like the Eternal usually known as Sprite (immortal child, eventually gave rise to legends/stories such as Peter Pan, powers were centered around illusions).
-
Is that pic on a monitor a spider with a skull for an abdomen?
-
Is that a hood folded down at the top of his back? If so I gotta think Taskmaster.
-
-
Is that spider webs strung across the letters? I certainly don't see them carrying that over into the final logo.
-
30 minutes ago, Litio said:
Makes sense, but they didn't take so long to make some changes in Fox calendar.
Of course it didn't. You're talking about integrating two slates that, up until a few months ago, were planned by competing studios. Some adjustments are more overtly necessary than others and there's not much sense in hem hawing around on those, particularly when it grants a longer production window for those films. But what could be considered "dumping" a troubled acquired project doesn't necessitate immediately shifting a release date forward. They can just as easily do that by limiting NM's planned reshoots, which have yet to happen, to pickups and letting it land on it's current date or push it a couple of weeks if they conclude a little more room between it and Mulan would be beneficial to the later.
-
56 minutes ago, Litio said:
Seriously, if New Mutants is so garbage, horrible, unsaveable, why didn't Disney simply put it on Hulu? If the film is unsaveable, why are they still wondering what to do with it? If Disney is forced to release this "unsaveable piece of crap" in theaters, why haven't they released it on a limited theatrical run with little or no marketing?
Not saying they will end up doing either of those things, but the deal for Fox has been closed less than 3 months. It's not as if Disney's release slate has been thin during that time frame. And their acquisition of Comcast's stake in Hulu hasn't even happened yet (and won't for an estimated 5 years).
-
At this point would any of us be surprised if, knowing media were snapping pics of the shoot, they had her do the scene with an iPhone with the intention of removing the logo and whatnot in post, just to send the fan speculation off on a wild goose chase?
-
Cons are fan service events. They're not well suited as a promotional spotlight because so much news and trailers are dropping over the course of a few days that everything ends up fighting for attention in the social media and news cycles that immediately follow. If giving your fanbase a thrill is what you need, then they're good for that but little else.
-
2
-
-
5 hours ago, Deja23 said:
Don’t really trust Jeremy Conrad’s ‘exclusives’.
It does seem like he just throws a lot of stuff at the wall an occasionally something hits the mark. The mods for the Marvel Spoilers reddit won't even allow his stuff to be posted over there anymore (or Daniel Richtman's for that matter).
-
1 hour ago, Amorphous said:
Is this really a prequel? Her hairstyle is very similar to the hairstyle she had in Endgame.
Aside from the shorter bangs it's most similar to her hair style in the AoE flashback sequence. The length seems closer to that as well.
-
24 minutes ago, VanillaSkies said:
Maybe the trolls just decided to give it up.... or maybe the troll problem just wasn't as big as it seemed to be, at least for the majority of films....
It was never a big problem relative to the entire landscape, it's just that they always chose high profile targets. Which is what prompted RT to make some adjustments. Creating a perception of the audience score being unreliable up on high where everyone was watching has a spillover effect on how the integrity of the score is viewed for every movie.
-
1 hour ago, MCKillswitch123 said:
You should be an actor. You'll win a lot of Oscars. And you'll actually have a life.
He might win 1 out of sheer persistence but he'd have to show some actual range to get more than that, and he has precious little.
-
31 minutes ago, TalismanRing said:
She's so overpowered and invulnerable that the most interesting story line from that would to see her either 1) go megalomaniacal like EGO 2) encounter a loss so big it breaks her like Thor or 3) how she reacts if she loses her powers (via Rogue etc)
She's been shown to be prone to mental manipulation in her solo movie. Now granted she ended up shaking that off by the end but that was tech based. Someone doing to her what Wanda did to the rest of the Avengers in AoU could take a lot of the wallop out of her.
-
1
-
Thor: Love and Thunder | July 8, 2022 | Directed by Oscar Winner Taika Waititi | Ninth most profitable movie of 2022
in Box Office Discussion
Posted
That could be where the whole Jane Foster having cancer angle comes in (if they preserve that aspect of the storyline at all). Imminent mortality, even someone else's, staring one in the face has a way of snapping things back into sharp relief. There's certainly the potential there to pull the both of them back together in a way that doesn't come off as a one-sided affair, if Taika can thread that needle.