Jump to content

WittyUsername

Free Account+
  • Posts

    9,987
  • Joined

Posts posted by WittyUsername

  1. Reshoots/pick-ups are a normal aspect of studio filmmaking. With that said, it seems pretty reasonable to say that this movie is undergoing more extensive reshoots compared to the norm, but that’s not necessarily a sign that the final product will fare poorly. The fact that they delayed it to 2025 would suggest that they’re taking their time. 

    • Like 1
  2. I don’t think it’s the corporations people are concerned about (at least I hope not). The concern when movies like Furiosa bomb is more because of the implications it has for the future of cinema. Movie theaters have already been walking on thin ice for a few years now, and having a bunch of high profile bombs doesn’t exactly help. 

    • Like 9
  3. 13 minutes ago, cannastop said:

    99% of movies fall in a general range of a multiple of the OW... even Elemental, it really surprised people with 5x legs, but that's really just another $30 m Dom, which isn't earth shattering. If Furiosa has 5x legs it still won't match the first Fury Road...

    I’m not even expecting Furiosa to have 3x legs, which is why I said I don’t think there was any saving it. 

    • Like 1
  4. 13 minutes ago, Squire said:

    A lot of Film Twitter can’t handle that Furiosa isn’t successful. I sort of get it, but still . . .

     

    2 minutes ago, cannastop said:

    Seems like excuses to me. I don't think reports of box office revenues drives people away from the theater or to it.

    In the case of Furiosa, I don’t think there was ever any saving it, but I do think there is a greater point to be made about how people need to stop being so quick to declare movie a bomb before seeing how its legs are. 

  5. 14 hours ago, HummingLemon496 said:

    Another one of my hot takes (maybe?) is that attributing the entire $922M difference between Captain Marvel and The Marvels to Endgame is really weird. Come on now, do you actually think Captain Marvel would've done just $200 million worldwide if it weren't for Endgame? Even if Captain Marvel wasn't tied into Endgame -- let's say it released in July 2016 -- it still probably would've done a solid $600-700M WW.

    I don’t think I’ve seen anyone suggest that Captain Marvel would’ve flopped without Endgame. Just that it’s unlikely it would’ve crossed a billion without the Marvel hype machine being at its absolute peak at the time. 

     

    As for The Marvels, there’s any number of likely reasons why it bombed. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.