Jump to content

VENOM

Free Account+
  • Posts

    781
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by VENOM

  1. 17 minutes ago, ViewerAnon said:

    (THE LAST JEDi was divisive and put some people off but clearly lots of folks were perfectly happy to come back for the next one)
     

    This is not the JUSTICE LEAGUE you’re looking for.

    But did less than the last Jedi. For the last film of the skywalker saga to do less is pretty mediocre.

    • Like 2
  2. 24 minutes ago, RealLyre said:

    box office wise TRoS would only be disappointing for me if it misses Rogue One numbers which I just don't see happening. I still think 165-180 OW is possible with up to 600M total once good WoM kicks in.    quality wise I'm sure it's fine even if it's a step down from TLJ. 

     

     

    A step down from TLJ puts it underground.

    • Like 3
  3. 21 minutes ago, redfirebird2008 said:

     

    Tenet depends on Nolan, not Pattison or any of the other actors. But it says a lot about Pattison's ability that Nolan would select him when he is able to get anyone he wants for his movies. 

    Washington is the lead, the main hero. He’s the one carrying the film and should be recognised as such not Pattison. 

    • Like 2
  4. 13 minutes ago, pepsa said:

    So you would agree that The last jedi's $300m drop from the  first movie in it's trilogie would be extremely alarming ^^

    That said TLJ had an insane predecessor and Jumanji was suprise mega hit so for the second one in the new one to retain 75% would be good.

    But the Solo 400 million drop was ominous 

    • Haha 1
  5. 16 minutes ago, a2k said:

    sorry but absurd. not every penny comes theatrically. for tentpoles with huge prod budgets, and prod budgets which are bigger than marketing spend, recovering the prod budget theatrically is almost always enough to break-even and make a profit.

    It’s not making a profit with production and marketing unless it goes over 700. Domestic is where it could make most of its money and it flopped. 

  6. 25 minutes ago, DAJK said:

    500 million is a huge loss for a 200 million film? And your math is...

    Advertising would be at least 150+ so it needs to make north of 750 to break even. Don’t use deadline as a barometer for what a movie needs to make. They still think the 90 million Once a upon a time needs to make 400 million to break even  

  7. 6 minutes ago, ThomasNicole said:

    Very good hold for Joker And Maleficent both dom and OS.

     

    Joker is definitely looking like a billionaire movie And M2 is Coming for +500M afterall.

    Maflopicent has a 200 million price tag excluding advertising costs so even if it makes 500 million that would still be a magnificent loss 

  8. 17 hours ago, TalismanRing said:

    Last year Christopher Robin was banned b/c President Xi Jinping had been mocked for his Winnie The Pooh shape - and that was before China escalated film censorship.

     

    But they've banned far more Chinese films than foreign ones - far more.

     

    One major Chinese studio saw two of it's most expensive high profile and /or well reviewed movies be removed from the schedule this summer.  Devastating since they can't release them elsewhere.
     

     

    China is going to ban the world because it can’t take a joke. Joker doesn’t even need China and it’s looking like it will crack a billion. Chinese movie studios should move out of this bubble

     

    15 hours ago, filmlover said:

     



    classic Tarantino! That Bruce Lee scene was hilarious  

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.