Jump to content

cory

Free Account+
  • Posts

    1,222
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cory

  1. 25 minutes ago, The Shrike said:

    More ammunition for you:

     

    Episode IV = $460,998,007

    Episode V = $290,475,067

     

    So, Empire Strikes Back made 63.01% of A New Hope's domestic gross.

     

    Episode VII = $936,662,225 x 63.01% = $590,190,860

     

    If Episode VIII surpasses that number, and that films detractors say the drop from Episode VII was due to how terrible a film it is, does that mean Empire Strikes Back was terrible too?

    Well the original grosses were 307 and 209 for a 68.07% retention. Which is exactly where TLJ will end up.

     

    If you really want to get detailed Star Wars made about 220 before its first official reissue/reexpansion and ESB made about 181. Both around 14 months of release. That puts initial retention at about 82%.

    • Like 4
  2. 10 minutes ago, Rebeccas said:

    Wait is there a real chance this falls behind Jurassic World lol wtf 

    I have it being at around 535-540 on New Years Day vs 507 for JW at the same point in its run. Of course JW was headed into 4th of July and deep summer weekdays while TLJ will be heading into regular January weekdays. I don’t see $150M left in the tank from Jan 2 on like JW had, but it should pass $650M with ease.

    • Like 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, IronJimbo said:

    That is you.


    You're being unreasonable, crying trolls despite the clear mixed reaction. You don't even have to look across the internet to see that. People on this site are completely mixed, I've been in the spoilers thread and I can tell the reaction is not positive.


    Read some of the reviews. I don't think "trolls" who manipulate polls would come up with so many reasons they didn't like the film.
    http://www.metacritic.com/movie/star-wars-episode-viii---the-last-jedi?ref=hp


     

    I’m actually agreeing with a lot of the points in these reviews but their score numbers are bitter and petty. It definitely can’t all be trolls. 

  4. Friday openers over $100m (adj) with 3x legs since 2000:

     

    Wonder Woman (Summer)
    Rogue One (Holiday)
    Finding Dory (S)
    The Secret Life of Pets (S)
    The Jungle Book
    The Force Awakens (H)
    Jurassic World (S)

    Guardians of the Galaxy (S)
    The Avengers
    Toy Story 3 (S)
    The Dark Knight (S)
    Iron Man
    Pirates of the Caribbean 2 (S)

    The Incredibles

    Finding Nemo (S)
    Spider-Man

    Harry Potter 1 (H)

    Rush Hour 2 (S)

     

    • Like 2
  5. 13 minutes ago, Barnack said:

     

    Was it not by 2 not so long ago ? (and just 10 year's ago, doubling was the success bar not the profit start bar).

     

    Big production budget movie usually can even make profit before doubling (production budget + participation bonus before profit) depending if they are domestic heavy enough.

     

    If the 125 million budget is true, that the same budget than Matt Damon Elysium, and that made a 20 million profit with a 286 million box office performance.

    Elysium was far less reliant on China.

  6. 4 minutes ago, Matrix4You said:

     

    Sounds about right.  Everyone says multiply production budget by 3 and anything in excess is profit.  The Mummy has a production budget of 125, so 370 is better than 375.  The Mummy should be profitable.

    My formula is production budget plus 10% compared to the estimated rentals broken up by the different rates for domestic/international/China. Approximates for the ratio of home video/television revenue streams and other costs to the theatrical details we get.

  7. 4 hours ago, dudalb said:

    The Mummy might not even get into profit....it all depends on how much they spent on  marketing. The WOM overseas is no better then the WOM domestic, and it going to be a film that opened well overseas but then dropped like a stone. Even if Uni manages to scrap out a modest profit..which is the best they can hope for, it is a very weak foundation for their "Dark Universe".

     

    And people are wildly over predicting the Animated Spidey movie. Spidey is Peter Parker for 90% of the audience out there, and I think they will probably reject any other version.

    And Miles Morales was not very successful in the comics;it was widley seen as a cynical stunt to grab the minority audiences.

     

    I have this estimated as losing $30-40m, depending on Cruise's participations (which I'm sure are generous).

    It would have to do something like 100 DOM / 160 INTL / 90 CHINA to get out of the red (350 WW).

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.