Jump to content

CloneWars

Free Account+
  • Posts

    5,763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CloneWars

  1. 1 hour ago, Alex SciChannel said:

    Carnivore is meat eater. Not animal killer. EATER is the key idea

    So, what's your point. Cleary the audience can't tell the difference because when an herbivore dinosaur kills an animal, the assumption is it did so to eat it. I am guessing not just me, but many, many audience members thought the same exact thing. Until this thread, I had no idea it wasn't a meat eater. I feel pretty confident I am not the only person to take this away from the movie.

    • Like 2
  2. So, WBs options

     

    Drop on HBO MAX. They would pretty much lose what they spent making the movie, so $200-$250M

    Reshoot Ezra's scenes. So, probably another $100M

    Digitally alter Ezra. Maybe less than reshooting, but still expensive.

    Do nothing. No upfront cost, but if Ezra is in the news when this hits can cause serious backlash and revenue loss for WB.

     

    So, no matter what, WB is in a losing position.

    • Like 1
  3. So next week is Lightyear. That makes me think this will probably have a steepish drop. Honestly, I think this opens similar to FK and finishes almost identically, at least DOM.

     

    I actually liked this one, but I guess bringing back the old cast isn't really a selling point. It was pretty much always about the dinos. Anyway, Jurassic movies for the most part have been a mixed bag, but it is not the worse by any stretch.

  4. I liked the third episode for the duel, but this episode just wasn't good. It was on par with the first couple of Boba Fett episodes, probably worse. If this didn't have McGregor, I would consider this almost ST levels bad. Hopefully, the next two pick up. Also, there's rumors this is going to get a second season. I guess with the viewing numbers that seems likely, so I hope this really finds it footing because Obi-Wan is a really interesting character, but this story just isn't that good.

  5. 27 minutes ago, EmpireCity said:

     

    That whole article really comes off as sour grapes whining.  You can absolutely make brutal, desolate movies that make a ton of money that the public will support in theaters.  The Revenant is an example of that.  

     

    You better have the perfect release date, marketing, story, star and awards season push.  The Revenant made almost $600m world wide.  The difference is it was starring an A-List actor and had a story that connected completely with a wide audience despite being brutal and desolate.  Iñárritu isn't exactly the most accessable or entertaining director either, but he knocked it out of the park.  

     

    The Daniels also figured out how to go from weird indie directors that came up with a Harry Potter farting coarpse to truly entertaining with Everything, Everywhere.  

     

    Again, I fucking LOVE Eggers, but his style and films have a limited audience.  I know he doesn't want to play the studio game, but get fucking used to it dude.  Guys more talented than him have figured out how to deliver a money maker to keep the bosses happy so they could make 2 other movies they were passionate about.  Welcome to Hollywood.  If you don't like it, stick to indie film budgets and releases.  

    Yup. The studios pay to have the movie made. I guess the other option become rich enough to self fund your own movies. I think a lot of people forget Lucas funded the prequels 100% out of his pocket. I know SW is mainstream though, but point is Lucas did what he wanted with the prequels.

  6. 5 minutes ago, M37 said:

    In regards to late sequels (or remakes), you have to factor in the nostalgia gap, essentially one generation or roughly 25 years. That's when enough time has passed where people who recall content they enjoyed when they were kids/teens/young adults are now at a place in their life where they will indulge it again, take their own kids, remember their youth, whatever. And yes TG2 is a 36 year gap, but look at the age/demo breakdown and image how it would look had it come out 10 years ago instead

     

    Here are some recent releases (off top of my head) and the gap from the original:

    Jurassic Park --> World = 32y

     

     

     

     

    22 year gap for JP and JW not 32.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.