Jump to content

MattW

Free Account+
  • Posts

    2,747
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MattW

  1. Since this used to be the franchise wars thread here's a little franchise of a different sort:

    - Inside Job (2010)

    - Too Big to Fail (2011)

    - Margin Call (2011)

    - The Big Short (2015)

    Too Big to Fail is an HBO movie and clearly on slightly lower level as far as the overall feel and flow of it, but I still enjoy it.  Margin Call and The Big Short are some of my favorites.

  2. 12/13/2019 Jumanji: The Next Level $40,000,000 – $60,000,000 $50,000,000 -29% $225,000,000 – $275,000,000     Sony / Columbia

     

    I don't see why this will have legs that are so much better than the hobbit movies.  Hobbit 2 opened on Dec 13 and didn't have a massive opener the following week and got a 3.5x multi.  I full expect Jumanji to be in the 3-4 range, 60/240 is a best case scenario, 50/175 seems much more likely.  As a number of other people have said opening the week after TLJ in 2017, esp given the latter's disappointments, is what gave it the edge.  This one opening before TRoS is all downside.

    • Like 3
  3. 4 minutes ago, a2k said:

    i wouldn't say it's easy unless it shows a bump to 35.

    34

    34

    22 (-35%)

    = 90

     

    35% drop is very optimistic looking at other animations this sunday.

    Outside shot Saturday bumps up, the bad weather yesterday may have kept a few people home who would have otherwise gone out for some shopping/entertainment. My guess is roughly flat with a 40% Sunday drop, 86-88

    • Like 1
  4. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-frozen-2-rule-thanksgiving-royal-100m-1258349
     

    Quote

     

    Frozen 2 will have no trouble staying atop the chart over the long Thanksgiving corridor (Wednesday-Sunday) with a royally great $100 million to $120 million for the five days.

    Rian Johnson's whodunit Knives Out  is on course to gross $8 million today — including $3.7 million in Tuesday previews and precious sneaks — for a five day total as high as $30 million to $25 million, ahead of expectations.

    Queen & Slim, helmed by acclaimed music video director Melina Matsoukas in her feature directorial debut from a script by Lena Waithe, is on course to gross $2.2 million on Wednesday for a projected five-day haul north of $15 million to $17 million

     

     

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
    • Astonished 1
  5. Last year grinch dropped a bit on Wed with higher ticket prices meaning admissions were down significantly. Hunger games all went up 20-30% on Wed meaning flat or very slight drop in admissions. So is frozen more similar to grinch or to hunger games

  6. I've never seen frozen.

    Bite me.

     

    Also some November animated Friday openers and some others that may be more or less related.

        Th Fr Wkend Th:Fr Th:Wkend Fr:Wkend
    2011 Happy 2 Feet -- 5.85 21.2 -- -- 3.62
    2012 Wreck It Ralph 0.38 13.51 49 35.55 128.95 3.63
    2014 Big Hero 6 1.4 15.81 56.2 11.29 40.14 3.55
    2015 Peanuts -- 12.08 44.2 -- -- 3.66
    2016 Trolls 0.9 12.37 46.6 13.74 51.78 3.77
    2018 Grinch 2.2 18.64 67.6 8.47 30.73 3.63
                   
    2016 Zootopia 1.7 19.5 75.1 11.47 44.18 3.85
    2016 Storks 0.44 5.8 21.3 13.18 48.41 3.67
    2016 Dory 9.2 54.7 135.1 5.95 14.68 2.47


    I'm not suggesting F2 will be anywhere close on the thursday ratio as these, but $9m may not be as bad as it seems. In fact I'm leaning towards F2 at least matching Dory's IM, 15+

    Interestingly, the Friday:Weekend ratio is pretty consistent for Nov animated movies with or without previews.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  7. https://variety.com/2019/film/box-office/box-office-jumanji-2-early-tracking-1203411581/

    https://deadline.com/2019/11/jumanji-the-next-level-richard-jewell-black-christmas-box-office-projections-1202791972/

     

    Jumanji tracking for 40-50, if it does 50 then it would match the first one's 5-day opening plus the pre-previews.  Same release date as Hobbit 2 which had a 3.5x multi, 50*3.5 = 175, maybe sidles up to 200 with a little extra summin-summin on both ends.  Seems like a reasonable upper bound to me.

    • Thanks 1
  8. 10 hours ago, a2k said:

    from the wrap article

    Quote

    But at the same time, analysts are ruling out a $150 million-plus opening despite record presales on Atom and Fandango because they believe that “Frozen II”‘s key audience, families, will probably wait until Thanksgiving weekend to see the film.

     

    It'll have a good thanksgiving week compared to normal weeks but do they really expect it to be unusually backloaded compared to other pre-thanksgiving releases?  Last year the grinch dropped 20% from the weekend before to the weekend after thanksgiving. That would be a phenomenal result for F2 imo.  I expect a much harsher drop, closer to hunger games than grinch. 

    • Like 1
  9. Is there is any movie star that is as important as strong IP?

    ROTHMAN Yeah, I think there are lots of movie stars. It's one of the great myths propagated out there that movie stars don't matter. I would say movie stars in the right role with the right property matter more than ever before.

    So you would trade the Spider-Man property for every Leo DiCaprio movie for the rest of his career?

    ALL (Laughter.)

    ROTHMAN I'd love to have both.

    EMMERICH Who is he negotiating with?

    ROTHMAN Well, I can tell you this. The event nature of having Leo and Brad [Pitt] and Margot [Robbie] in [Sony's] Once Upon a Time in Hollywood was essential. You had to make a great movie … but that movie was not based on any IP at all. That is a pure original. Came out of the imagination and the headspace of one individual. Because even Disney will run out of animated movies to remake. And we have to be careful not to narrow our audience, not to think that there isn't room for originality. I think there is. In the pursuit of that, movie stars are tremendously valuable.

    EMMERICH The thing that we all sit around talking about is "theatricality." IP and movie stars are two huge ingredients. You have to have one or the other. It's even better if you have both.

    • Like 3
  10. You recently said that if Netflix spends $60 million on a movie, to be successful it should be watched by 30 million accounts. That's the first time I have heard you talk about the success metric for a Netflix film. Does that formula apply across the board?

    STUBER No. Each film, like for all of us, the P&Ls are different. Having been on both sides — the theatrical business and now streaming — there is so much out there for the consumer that we are fighting for time. The assumption is that it's easier [at Netflix] because I don't [have box office pressure]. But we have our own tracking. We have our own anxiety. We have our own opening weekend. That was a rough estimate, but different things take different marketing aspects.

    So what do you look at on Monday morning after a big film debuts on the service?

    STUBER We value over a month, basically. We look at 28 days and because we can see where things are opportunistic, we can market toward it. We can market in the second and third weeks as well. We greenlight off of X money and how much we are going to spend. And we hope that this many people watch in that 28 days. And that's our success rate metric.

    Take a film like The Irishman. That's been gestating for a long time, it was at several different studios, and you took it on for about $150 million. It's three and a half hours long. What is the success metric for that film?

    STUBER There are a lot of variables. When I took the job [in 2017], I was building a new studio. We have no IP, we have no library, we can't remake things. We don't have the great cache that Alan has over there. So you have to say, what is your opportunity? And your opportunity is filmmakers. For us to get Marty [Scorsese] at Netflix was a big thing. It was a big win. So that was one thing. And then the economics. We have enough subscribers that we think the movie can deliver on. Thankfully he over-delivered.

     

    Jim, you are smiling. You gave that film up.

    GIANOPULOS Yeah. Well, before my time, but nevertheless. It was very ambitious for a studio to take on a project like that. There is a different perception of the economics. For us, at that level, for a period drama — or for anyone, I would submit — it was ambitious. And it was perhaps too ambitious.

    EMMERICH That's where the consumer wins. I don't think any of the studios could make that movie at that cost at that length and come out alive.

    GIANOPULOS Right.

    EMMERICH But it works for Netflix for the reason that Scott said.

    As people who have spent your careers in the theatrical movie business, doesn't it bum you out that you can't make The Irishman?

    LANGLEY You know, it actually doesn't. It would bum me out if no one made the movie.

    HORN That's right.

    LANGLEY That's what's really exciting about our entire ecosystem right now, even though it is giving us the headaches and sleepless nights. It's never been a better time for filmmakers and storytelling and for things to find their way into the world that were getting squeezed over the last five or six years or even longer.

    EMMERICH The only difference for us, and maybe for the average consumer — I'll bet everyone at this table wants to see The Irishman in a theater.

    LANGLEY Yeah.

    EMMERICH And it will be available, to some extent. Or we'll get invited to Scott's house.

    STUBER You're all invited. (Laughs.)

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.