excel1
-
Posts
6,594 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by excel1
-
-
This feels like it is going utterly barnstorm pop culture in September and October.
-
2
-
-
2 hours ago, titanic2187 said:
Nothing wrong of being a "both side" pleaser. In fact, people taking strong stance is the reason why our society has gotten so toxic nowadays. Everyone wants thing going their way, totally ignoring the fact the people are diverse in value.
A reasonable both sides take covers more people than either extreme, though, which is the broad point being made. Deep down, both sides know
SpoilerJan 6th is mostly DT's fault and was a complete embarrassment, the Biden economy is booming, Biden is old AF on paper only, etc
-
2 hours ago, Bob Train said:
Still don’t see how a movie with one of the most famous fictional characters of all time and sequel to a $1b grossing movie is a harder sell than an introspective 3-hour long hard sci-fi like Dune…
Agreed x 1000000. JOKER also functioned as the quasi sequel we always
wantedneeded and never had to Ledger's iconic take.Joker 2 featuring Lady fucking Gaga as Harley is going to enormous.
-
2
-
-
hold my hand was a counter to I aint worried.
-
David GOAT Zaslav continues his epic winning streak 😱
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
-
Honest question, what does the casting of Lady Gaga as Harley Quinn rank historically for comic book film casting? On paper, it such a slam dunk both commercially and critically, it is akin to Jack Nicholson as Joker back in 1989. JOKER 2 was always going to be big but Gaga as the iconic character just feels like a peak star power flex.
-
3
-
-
She's certainly a name, and she does add some legitimacy to this project, simply put.
-
5 minutes ago, HummingLemon496 said:
Even more impressive is how The Dark Knight (a solo Batman movie) outsold No Way Home, with 3 different Spider-Men and ALL of the villains🤣
TDK = GOAT.
Simple, basic, entirely inarguable explanation.
-
1
-
-
Wish I was able to catch Spider-man 2002 during the release. Inject that early 2000s nostalgia straight into my veins! That was an unforgettable opening night and weekend for a movie buff.
Spoilernow just imagine if Hartnett hadn't been deemed "would be" too famous when they doing the casting of Peter!
-
1
-
-
As someone who has not idea what the original is about and never saw it, I thought this was good.
-
2
-
-
The plot sounds so B movie that I almost think it must be VERY good script, bc otherwise it isn't getting made
-
7 hours ago, TheDude391 said:
post 2019 WB trailers have never reached their past heights tbf
What? ELVIS had the best trailer of 2022, Barbie's entire campaign is iconic level, DUNE 2's final trailer was unreal, etc.
Re: Furiosa, yeah I have no idea how this will do but I think this doesn't have near the mass appeal that some will like claim it has.
-
Dune 3 is obviously happening. WB owns the post Covid correction franchise game for the net 3-4 years with sequels to Barbie, Beetle Juice, The Batman, Dune, Joker, Wonka, and Twisters.
-
This is definitely one of those "the trailer is more watchable than the film" instances
-
1
-
3
-
-
I found DUNE 2 to be an utter chore to sit through, but it is indeed pure CINEMA and the theater owners deserve every penny!
-
1
-
-
SKULL ISLAND was randomly pretty sweet and well done. But no doubt seeing this series becoming BAYFORMERS esque is a bit sad given how vividly I can recall PJ's epic prestige version of KONG in late 2005.
-
1
-
-
Killers was an obnoxiously self indulgent film. Not surprised in the slightest that it was an awards flop.
-
1
-
-
Gunn appears to be making a classic, traditional SUPERMAN film, which frankly is exactly what they should be doing.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, grim22 said:
He's old and has a newborn at home. Probably badly sleep deprived
bruh he isn't taking care of the newborn lol
-
where the fuck were the big Brendan Fraser roles were we supposed hear about in 2023?!?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Cmasterclay said:
Oppenheimer one of the few films that would win every single year (though it would be weird if it won pre-1945). Past dominant winners like Dances With Wolves, Lawrence of Arabia and Gone With The Wind too problematic for modern sensibilities. Lord of the Rings and Silence of the Lambs and any musical too genre for certain eras. One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest swept up but might not be "important" enough to win all the time. Even Titanic and Forrest Gump might get picked apart for being too goofy these days, though they did give it to Coda and EEAAO. Godfather I and II, Amadeus, Casablanca, Oppenheimer off top of my head that check every box in every era. May have forgotten something but point is Oppenheimer up there with most dominant contenders ever.
Oppenheimer is the classic mass appeal prestige historical Oscar baity film, that it delivered entirely on its potential makes it an easy slam dunk for sure.
-
Bradley needs to write direct and star in OPPENHEIMER meets MAVERICK film vibe on PEARL HARBOR
-
2 minutes ago, Eric Atreides said:
So...no Matt Damon joke? Huh.
LOL the dog peed on his Walk of Fame star at the very end.
-
4 minutes ago, MysteryMovieMogul said:
The Trump rant was real, though.
Trump will only fully go away when there's no attention and the entertainment value is gone
Civil War | A24 | Alex Garland action thriller | 04/12/2024
in Box Office Discussion
Posted · Edited by excel1
In all seriousness, my early 2000's self is thrilled to see Kirsten Dunst on the cover of a major mag.
For real. Tobey McGuire + Kirsten Dunst "Spider-man Returns" would be H.U.G.E.