Jump to content

tonytr87

Free Account+
  • Posts

    6,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tonytr87

  1. Is it really going to take the death of another Spider-Man franchise to convince people that Venom is a boring and shallow stereotype of a character?

    Almost any villian can be made great if fleshed out enough. A talented filmmaker can take Venom, Carnage, Kraven, Mysterio, any of them and make them great characters, even if they're subpar in the comics. Carnage, for example, could be made into a pretty dynamic adversary with his unique status as a serial killer (something never approached in a comic-book film). They could play with his psychology quite a bit and make him more than just a wacko with bloodlust.
    • Like 1
  2. Wow. So what is getting all those screens being freed up? A quick glance at that list shows well over 11,000 screens from those movies but the 2 new wide releases only total around 5,300. That still leaves about 6,000 screens unaccounted for and the new limited releases will barely make a dent in that number.

    They're preparing for TDKR B)
  3. I think MM collapsed, because it should have decreased like Ted yesterday, but the discount Tuesdays helped to keep the number high. But it's awful for TASM, it's officially a failure, 280m is gone, the question is how lower can it get.

    ASM could've been affected by people doing their 4th of July thing instead of going to the movies, but after checking years past that's been the case only some of the time, so I guess it depends on the movie. Fri's number will tell us a lot more.
  4. Generally speaking, comparing within genres is fine, IMO. But it starts getting hard to offer a pure objective opinion -- did the comedy pull off being funny more than the drama pulled off being dramatic?

    Good point. Nevertheless I still like to compare everything.
  5. Well, The Tree of Life is a pretty challenging movie for a BP nominee.

    Stylistically, yes, but as far as themes and story content (50's era family life fits right in with the 60-80 year-old contingent that dominates the Academy), not really. I'm also pretty sure it wouldn't have made the cut if the exact same movie had a director other than Malick's name attached to it.Back on topic...hope Ted keeps chugging. We need more original hits.
  6. Yes, thats what I meant. Hey, there were some good nominees this year! Tree of Life, Midnight in Paris, The Descendants.. But yeah Extremely Long and Incredibly Boring was.. yeah.

    Besides EL&IC they were good/decent flicks, but I like to see great/relevant/challenging films nominated. Only three of last year's nominees (The Descendants, Midnight in Paris, and Moneyball) were in my top 12.And Albert Brooks should've replaced Sydow in my opinion (or Jonah Hill). I know a lot of people like to say that a performance without dialogue is more difficult, but I say the opposite.
  7. Hmm, really? I think the 2011 Oscar nominees are of the highest quality yet. Not one of the BP nominees was bad or even mediocre IMO

    I assume you mean the nominees released in 2010? Because last year was a minor travesty (Extremely Loud, War Horse getting nominated/great films like Shame, Drive, Take Shelter getting shut out/a trifle like The Artist winning).
    • Like 1
  8. I was wondering will WOM be bad, if its seen to be better then Spider Man 3?

    The thing is WOM doesn't have to be bad for legs to be weak. If the general consensus among casual moviegoers is "it's okay" or indifference, that's not going to convince their friends who might be on the fence to go watch a Spider-man movie in theaters for the fourth time.
  9. I figured anything below Batman Begins or Superman Returns would be disappointing, since those are really the only comparisons we have for this type of situation. I figured on 225 or so, basically a bit better than those two thanks to inflation and 3d.

    250m would be a modest success when you factor in OS, but overall it's disappointing due to the fact it's Spider-man. Batman Begins and Superman Returns were coming off not just poorly received precedessors, but long layoffs and four previous films instead of three. According to many here, this was/is supposed to cross 300m on brand alone.
  10. I would say my biggest problem with the movie is that it's too long and too short at the same time. I had the same issue with Superman Returns(but, thankfully, this doesn't have some of the more cringeworthy moments in SR and it does have actual battles...more than one even.)Tell me if you get what I mean after seeing it. ;)

    That was my biggest problem too. The film manages to be slow while still glossing over some major character development, for both Peter and Connors. Also, even though the moments they have together are some of the best in the movie, Peter and Gwen's relationship is rushed.
  11. They used the "got destroyed" nail biter.

    True. Forgot about that (already forgetting important parts of the film...whoops). Nevertheless it just makes more sense that the spider-bite would've given Peter the ability to spin webs. Source material is not perfect, some things CAN be improved. And I feel that was one change that was an improvement on the comics.Also, if they want to show Peter's intellect...spider-tracers.
  12. I thought they worked in the first film, but other than when he lost his powers, he always had an endless supply. Some of the best moments in the comics were when he either ran out or his shooting devices jammed/got destroyed and he didn't have the webbing to use as a crutch. He was then forced to actually "duke it out" with a villain, or use his brain to find another way to defeat him.

    Eh, not really a good enough reason to include them. My biggest problem with the mech shooters is how purely illogical they are. A small wrist-sized cartridge can produce webbing for hours on end? Ironically ASM never even used the "run out of webbing" nailbiter. They also didn't even show how he acquired the fluid from Oscorp. He just has it sitting there in his room all of a sudden like he mail-ordered the thing.
  13. I'll say this again. Who except iJack was expecting this to reach SM3 admissions? Nobody, now suddenly when it opens though people act as if this was supposed to outgross SM3 domestically

    I don't think most of us are saying that. We're just not buying that this is going to cross 300mil (at least I'm not). This will be a modest success like Pirates 4 and Shrek 4 were modest successes.
    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.