WittyUsername
-
Posts
9,987 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by WittyUsername
-
-
26 minutes ago, The Futurist said:
At least, it will look good, which GA prefers usually.
This movie looks pretty good to me. I like the unique animation style it has, and it’s the first superhero movie to truly tackle the concept of a multiverse, which helps it stand out even more.
-
30 minutes ago, dudalb said:
But Disney will have some compensation in they will get a slice of Spideyverse's profits from Marvel's deal with Sony.
Is that how the deal works? I thought the deal was just that Spider-Man would be able to appear in Disney produced MCU films in exchange for Marvel making Spider-Man films for Sony.
-
6 minutes ago, Rorschach said:
I didn't really care for the Disney live-action remake. That said, the move to Netflix for this film gave me a bit of worry about the project when that was announced and it seems like there was some validity to that worry.
It's a shame tho. I love Andy Serkis and I'll always root for him and any of his future projects that he delves into. Seems like this one was just a mixed effort.
This film was always a risky endeavor anyway, especially compared to the Jon Favreau version. At the very least, I appreciate that Andy Serkis was apparently allowed to do something different, even if it didn’t really work out.
-
It’s at 50% on Rotten Tomatoes right now. I’ll probably watch it.
-
Even though I haven’t seen this movie, I’m rooting for either it or Isle of Dogs to win Best Animated Feature for no reason other than that I’m sick of Disney always winning that category. It probably helps that Disney’s two big animated films this year are sequels that aren’t considered as good as their predecessors.
- 1
-
25 minutes ago, Jessie said:
but are either of them better than TDK? that's the real question
I can’t say I thought BP was better than TDK. I think it was more on the level of Wonder Woman.
-
19 minutes ago, MyMovieCanBeatUpYourMovie said:
Nope.
-
1 minute ago, PANDA said:
Also, for whatever reason the Academy hasn’t liked those LEGO movies (Granted they were right to snub Batman, they just should have picked a different movie to nod instead)
I think the Academy’s reason for not nominating the LEGO movies is that they see them as these cheap commercial products to sell toys.
-
38 minutes ago, MovieMan89 said:
I knew this was gonna be a critical smash. Now let's just hope it follows suit at the box office, though I'm very weary for it. Hopefully this doesn't go down as Mask of the Phantasm 2.0.
I don’t see why it would. IIRC, that movie flopped because it was made into a theatrical release at the last minute.
- 1
-
If someone had told me a couple of months ago that Black Panther wasn’t going to be the highest rated CBM of 2018, I would’ve thought that person was talking out of their ass. Granted, it’s only 44 reviews, but that average score is insane.
- 2
-
-
17 minutes ago, Valonqar said:
Do you think they'll put Kamala Khan in the sequel? Since they are a couple in CB no?
Sony definitely doesn’t have the rights to that character. Then again, if they’re allowed to use Kingpin, I suppose Marvel might be willing to lend Ms. Marvel to them, but from what I understand, they’re planning on including her in the MCU at some point.
-
6 minutes ago, CoolioD1 said:
more like Meh-gli?
Oh well. It was pretty obvious from the start that this wouldn’t receive the praise that the 2016 movie received. I personally wasn’t crazy about the Disney version, but it’s probably the least offensive of their live action remakes, and if people like it, more power to them.
-
The movie seems to be getting a mixed response so far.
-
When was the last time a film not made by Disney managed to win the Oscar for Best Animated Feature? Does anyone think this movie has a shot at that?
-
3 hours ago, PANDA said:
People said that domestically then both were crushed by TFA.
Now it’s being said WW, and guess which global phenomenon is coming for the both of them?
Honestly Titanic might sink to number 4-7 with Pika Pika, Avengers 4, Episode IX and Frozen 2 coming to dominate as well
Episode IX? I know it’s still early in the game, but I can’t think of any reason for why that would be a $2 billion hit. The popularity of Star Wars is in the gutter right now. China wants nothing to do with the franchise, toy sales are abysmal and TLJ (which I liked) pushed away a lot of fans.
- 2
-
1 minute ago, John Marston said:
did the trailer that released during Comic Con actually play in theaters? Because it hasn't then we haven't gotten a theatrical trailer for this yet
It played for me when I went to see Venom.
-
30 minutes ago, Daenys said:
I’m not so sure a Muslim superhero would do very well on the big screen anytime within the next few years.
-
1 hour ago, Daenys said:
What’s Kamala Khan doing there?
-
Just now, filmlover said:
This feels 2-3 years too late.
I think the problem is more that there were already two LEGO movies last year.
-
Is there any reason the sequel hasn’t officially been announced yet? This movie is officially Sony’s key to getting a piece of the cinematic universe pie that they’ve been desperately trying to obtain since 2012.
-
2 hours ago, AndyK said:
Will they still be able to have the film ready by the beginning of April?
-
This honestly looks more interesting to me than the Jon Favreau version. Still, is Kaa supposed to be a villain here like in the Disney films? I’m not especially familiar with the original source material, but wasn’t Kaa something of a benevolent and wise mentor in the original story?
-
16 minutes ago, Deuce66 said:
Ok I would ask critics who continue to parrot this 3D bit the following ?
Can you explain why Avatar in 2D was the biggest selling Blu-Ray of All-Time until Frozen came along?
No one is saying the movie wasn’t huge when it came out. What people are saying is that it’s not something that’s really talked about much anymore.
Also, I don’t see why people can’t be allowed to bring up the 3D novelty that the first film had going for it when a large chunk of its tickets that were sold were for 3D screenings. That doesn’t mean the movie would’ve flopped without 3D, but it certainly helped make the movie feel like more of an event.
I’m not even bashing the movie, I’m just providing a possible explanation for why some people are suggesting that these movies are “disasters in the making”.
Spider-Man: Into The Spider-verse | 12.14.2018 | Sony | Phil Lord and Chris Miller
in Box Office Discussion
Posted · Edited by WittyUsername
This movie should definitely perform better than LBM overseas. LEGO isn’t a big brand OS, but Spider-Man is.
Edit: What’s with the “wtf” reaction to this post? None of the LEGO movies have done well in other countries.