Jump to content

WittyUsername

Free Account+
  • Posts

    9,987
  • Joined

Posts posted by WittyUsername

  1. 39 minutes ago, grim22 said:

    Will be PG-13

     

     

    Looks like Tom Hardy's kid will get to see the movie after all. 

     

    Seriously though, I'm not trying to suggest that being "edgy" automatically makes something better, but this movie probably would've been better off with an R-rating. It looks pretty generic as it is, and not being able to go all out with the violence isn't going to help. 

    • Haha 1
  2. 22 minutes ago, Rebeccas said:

    Sounds like Feige wasn't really consulted on this and it's affecting pre-production and countless people's jobs, which is why he's pissed. I still don't understand why Disney didn't take a week to sit everyone down and then make the decision. Certainly the actors probably would've been more accommodating if it wasn't just dropped like a bombshell before anyone even knew there was a controversy going on.

    Because appeasing rapists like Mike Cernovich apparently takes priority...

    • Thanks 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Pure Spirit said:

    I'm not a D'Souza supporter, I haven't seen his documentaries, I only know that he says the Democratic party is racist and then the NYT comes along and is like, "we gotchu fam". If opposing racism is supporting D'Souza, I don't know what to say to that kind of accusation.

     

    Racism is unacceptable no matter who it is directed at. This will be my last post in this garbage thread. Here's a more appropriate forum to discuss the issue.

     

    No one ever said that racism is acceptable in any context, but the narrative that D’Souza is trying to promote is that white supremacism is a Democrat ideal. The. New York Times thing doesn’t support that particular narrative, because white supremacists would definitely not be willing to look past an Asian woman saying bad things about white men. 

     

    Anyway, it looks like this is going to be D’Souza’s lowest grossing movie to date, in which case, good. That would suggest that people are getting tired of his bullshit. 

    • Like 1
  4. 13 minutes ago, RandomCat said:

    Shhhh, stop pointing out the inconsistencies, it makes it harder for him to pretend to be better than other people.

    I do find it pretty interesting how right wing nuts (just so everyone knows, this is not an attack on Republican people in general, just the ones like D’Souza and his fans) can’t seem to decide whether Democrats are the real racists to anyone who isn’t white, or if the Dems are actively trying to destroy white people. Which is it? 

  5. On 8/4/2018 at 1:23 PM, Pure Spirit said:

    So is the NYT trying to get DJT re-elected?

     

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-anti-white-racism.html

     

    The "dems are the reeeeeal racists" shtick from Dinesh has a bit more bite when stuff like this happens.

    I thought the accusation from D’Souza was that the Democrats are Nazis and Klansmen? This doesn’t really align with that accusation, given that the controversy is in regards to an Asian woman saying negative things about white men. 

  6. 2 minutes ago, Firepower said:

    Jeff Sneider said on the yesterday Collider podcast that the movie has serious problems and it underwent massive reshoots last month, which Tom Hardy largly oversaw. And he mentioned a few times that it's rated R. I'm surprised that nobody makes news about it.

    It’s difficult to know what to believe with rumors like this after the DP2 debacle. 

  7. Okay, I love Tom Hardy, but his New York accent really isn’t working. 

     

    Anyway, there wasn’t really anything about the trailer that grabbed me. That end bit with him telling the guy how he’s gonna eat him was kind of amusing, and the fact that he literally licks someone’s face is pretty hilarious, but for the most part, this seemed like a pretty standard trailer. 

     

    As as a side note, as someone who does not understand the complaints about the CGI in the Aquaman trailer, I will say that the CGI for this movie actually does look kind of dodgy. 

    • Like 1
  8. 2 hours ago, Pandamia! said:

    To be fair, it sounds like Netflix is pushing to have theatrical releases before they put it on their streaming platform.

     

    If anything, Netflix and Amazon might turn into new theatrical distributors, which could help given Paramount (and Sony a few years back) have been struggling and Fox is disappearing.

     

    Im also fine with streaming releases too.  While I don’t want the only viewing option to be streaming, it’d actually benefit me to be able to see indie flicks (and non blockbuster stuff) through a streaming.  Would be cheaper, I could see more movies, and sometimes it’s just hard to get out to the theater.

     

    Plus if anything, Mowgli is going to get more exposure through Netflix than it would through WB.  It was going to bomb in its October WB slot, now it has an opportunity to actually get seen.

     

    Dont get the doom and gloom.

    That’s a nice way of looking at it. It’s still unfortunate that we’re going to have to wait even longer before we can actually see the movie, though. 

  9. 6 minutes ago, That One Guy said:

    If this is the future of cinema, then holy shit do I not want this to happen.

    From the very beginning of this year, I was worried that we would soon get to a point where the only movies that would get theatrical releases would be Disney films. Unfortunately, that’s starting to seem more and more likely. 

    • Like 3
  10. That’s disappointing to hear, but I guess I can’t say it’s particuarly shocking. No matter how good or bad the movie ends up being, it was always going to have the misfortune of being released so soon after the Jon Favreau film (which I personally didn’t care for). I’m still hoping for a theatrical release of some kind, but I’m not holding my breath. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.