Jump to content

WittyUsername

Free Account+
  • Posts

    9,987
  • Joined

Posts posted by WittyUsername

  1. 23 minutes ago, Elessar said:

    I'd like to ask David Ehrlich why the sequels sound like a disaster in the making. Making sequels to an almost $3b movie seems like one of the safest bets one can make...

    I assume it’s because people don’t really talk about Avatar anymore. The movie made headlines back when it was released for its groundbreaking 3D effects, but 3D is mostly viewed as just some cheap gimmick these days, so the sequels might not be able to get by on that alone. To put it plainly, if anyone other than James Cameron was directing a bunch of Avatar sequels, they most likely would be written off as bombs. 

  2. 6 minutes ago, JGAR4LIFE said:

    Shazam? Godzilla? MIB? It 2? Jumanji 2?

     

    There’s much more aside from the Disney giants.

    Out of all those films, the only ones I’ll give you are the last two, and even then, I seriously doubt they’ll do as well as their predecessors. 

     

    Anyway, I’m guessing the person here who said that WB is the worst studio is either joking, or isn’t aware of Sony. 

    • Like 1
  3. 14 minutes ago, MrFanaticGuy34 said:

    Well, internet critics like Nostalgia Critic & Confused Matthew didn’t see it that way. Their opinions of the actor & the movies must be different, i think. Particularly the first one which had good but not overly spectacular reviews.

     

    I think maybe Sam Raimi’s SM3’s mixed reputation, kinda hurt the confidence of great future SM-films (which is maybe why Marc Webb’s TASM’s weren’t as big hits as the Raimi-films)...but then SM: Homecoming brought back the fun charm of what made people love the first two Raimi-Spidey movies.

     

    And now we have Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock/Venom. Which makes me wonder....how does he compare to Topher Grace’s Eddie Brock/Venom from SM3?

    It might be easy to forget, but back in 2012, I distinctly recall there having been a number of people who said that Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man was a breath of fresh air. While the film as a whole was overshadowed by the The Avengers and The Dark Knight Rises, The Amazing Spider-Man did have a fair amount of defenders back in the day. 

  4. 22 minutes ago, MagnarTheGreat said:

    For the curious. Note that not all movies launched on a weekend, such as TASM, though I haven't gotten around to specifically noting the titles. Sequels are more frontloaded than origins or first entries in general, and the calendar also has an effect, as does the overall opening and box office.

     

    Live-action Comic Book Superhero
    Movies (2008 – 2018)
    Multiplier
    (DG ÷ FW)
    90% of
    Gross
    on Day
    Domestic
    Gross
    First
    Weekend
    Release
    Month
    Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice 1.99 18 $330.4M $166.0M Mar. 2016
    X-Men Origins: Wolverine 2.11 24 $179.9M $85.1M May 2009
    Kick-Ass 2 2.16 17 $28.8M $13.3M Aug. 2013
    Fantastic Four 2.18 20 $56.1M $25.7M Aug. 2015
    Green Lantern 2.19 20 $116.6M $53.2M Jun. 2011
    The Amazing Spider-Man 2 2.21 24 $202.9M $91.6M May 2014
    Captain America: Civil War 2.28 23 $408.1M $179.1M May 2016
    Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance 2.34 22 $51.8M $22.1M Feb. 2012
    Iron Man 3 2.35 25 $409.0M $174.1M May 2013
    X-Men: Apocalypse 2.36 20 $155.4M $65.8M May 2016
    Avengers: Age of Ultron 2.40 26 $459.0M $191.3M May 2015
    Kick-Ass 2.42 20 $48.1M $19.8M Apr. 2010
    Suicide Squad 2.43 30 $325.1M $133.7M Aug. 2016
    The Incredible Hulk 2.43 23 $134.8M $55.4M Jun. 2008
    Iron Man 2 2.44 27 $312.4M $128.1M May 2010
    Justice League 2.44 23 $229.0M $93.8M Nov. 2017
    Man of Steel 2.50 22 $291.0M $116.6M Jun. 2013
    The Wolverine 2.50 24 $132.6M $53.1M Jul. 2013
    Deadpool 2* 2.54 29 $318.5M $125.5M May 2018
    Logan 2.56 26 $226.3M $88.4M Mar. 2017
    Thor: Ragnarok 2.57 29 $315.1M $122.7M Nov. 2017
    X-Men: Days of Future Past 2.58 28 $233.9M $90.8M May 2014
    Avengers: Infinity War 2.63 30 $678.8M $257.7M Apr. 2018
    X-Men: First Class 2.66 24 $146.4M $55.1M Jun. 2011
    Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 2.66 30 $389.8M $146.5M May 2017
    Captain America: The First Avenger 2.72 26 $176.7M $65.1M Jul. 2011
    Captain America: The Winter Soldier 2.73 30 $259.8M $95.0M Apr. 2014
    Doctor Strange 2.74 29 $232.6M $85.1M Nov. 2016
    Deadpool 2.74 31 $363.1M $132.4M Feb. 2016
    Thor 2.75 26 $181.0M $65.7M May 2011
    The Dark Knight Rises 2.79 30 $448.1M $160.9M Jul. 2012
    Ant-Man and the Wasp* 2.85 31 $216.2M $75.8M Jul. 2018
    Spider-Man: Homecoming 2.86 36 $334.2M $117.0M Jul. 2017
    Marvel’s The Avengers 3.01 35 $623.4M $207.4M May 2012
    Ant-Man 3.15 37 $180.2M $57.2M Jul. 2015
    Iron Man 3.23 37 $318.4M $98.6M May 2008
    The Dark Knight 3.37 36 $533.3M $158.4M Jul. 2008
    Black Panther 3.47 38 $700.1M $202.0M Feb. 2018
    Guardians of the Galaxy 3.53 43 $333.2M $94.3M Aug. 2014
    Wonder Woman 4.00 41 $412.6M $103.3M Jun. 2017
    The Amazing Spider-Man 4.23 25 $262.0M $62.0M Jul. 2012
    average of table 2.70 28      
    median of table 2.57 27      
    * highlighted in yellow: numbers are not final / still in theaters
     
    display of dollars rounded to nearest hundred thousand
    this is an incomplete work-in-progress / numbers current as of October 2, 2018

     

    Calendar effect

    Release
    Month
    Average
    Multiplier
    Median
    Multiplier
    Release
    Month
    Average
    Multiplier
    Median
    Multiplier
    January 2.88 2.66 July 3.30 3.22
    February 2.81 2.73 August 3.22 3.00
    March 3.02 2.89 September 2.87 2.75
    April 2.76 2.65 October 3.02 2.75
    May 2.95 2.82 November 3.43 3.23
    June 3.13 3.01 December 5.45 4.76
    all (1025 movies) 3.21 2.93
    excludes 2018 releases
    highest month in blue; lowest month in red
     
    numbers from top opening domestic earners (2008-2017) as of August 16, 2018

    The legs for WW really were remarkable for a movie that opened in June. 

    • Like 1
  5. 2 minutes ago, YourMother the Edgelord said:

    sneakytom.jpg

    I guess I just have trouble believing that a remake of one of Disney’s most successful properties of their Renaissance era would flop, regardless of it possibly being bad. I certainly have no interest in it, but people these days are suckers for a nostalgia cash grab. Then again, I wasn’t expecting Solo: A Star Wars Story to not even manage to cross $400 million worldwide, so who knows? 

  6. 15 minutes ago, Hades said:

    Oh they will stop  making money for sure eventually, when they start considering making stuff like Home on the range. They will soon burn through all the top animated films. That day is coming, a lot sooner than we all think.

    In any case, there’s no chance of Aladdin or especially The Lion King (how is that even going to be live action?) flopping, so this trend is going to continue for at least another few years. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.