That was filmed and looked exactly like you would see something as your eyes did? Or do you prefer movies as they are, stylized and not as dirty?I think it would be interesting to have a gritty movie with no post-production touching up.
As I said in another thread, I thought this was delightful. Funny in many moments and morbid in others. Audience loved it. And it was pretty to look at, thanks to Jeff Cronenweth.I'd campaign Helen Mirren but it would be solely for that one scene - "I cry for you when they are bad..." which is much longer and better than the trailer.
I was close to seeing Flight tonight but I had no way to get to the theater so, alas, I did not.I kind of do want to see it but it's low on my priorities list.
I just found out that Steve McQueen is black. For some reason that makes me view "Shame" differently xDMy gov teacher told us to watch Hunger (we're learning about Ireland) and she said, "It's directed by Steve McQueen" and I was like, "Oh, Shame!" and she was like, "Yea." o___________O I hope she didn't see it.
I still want to see Flight, but I imagine it being the most slow and boring courtroom drama one could possibly envisage. So there's a CGI plane crash in the beginning. What could follow it?
I'll keep it shorter by saying Jennifer Lawrence is great but I don't think her role is very flashy. Her voice can't go high enough to scream so those scenes are just completely awkward. Bradley Cooper was the best part of the movie by far, followed by Robert De Niro.
OH GOD FINALLY.Basically totally amazing, heartbreaking, uplifting, beautiful, funny, emotional, etc.And then the last ten minutes when he discusses the "alternate ending" kind of rips you out of the moment and you leave extremely disappointed until you start pretending the last ten minutes never happened.