Genuine question: are people mistaking Michael Waldron for Jeff Loveness, who wrote Quantumania? Because Waldron's last Marvel movie came just under a billion.
Why is everyone pretending that Multiverse of Madness was a bomb again?
Does everyone think now every single sequel will have a The Marvels type drop just because they're also sequels?
A lot of people seem shocked for...some reason? Right after it's reported the director of Multiverse of Madness is in the running for Kang and Secret Wars, the writer of Multiverse of Madness and Secret Wars being involved shouldn't be a huge surprise.
If they're announcing the cast they might have concept art of the team as well, that'd be pretty cool. If it's really set in the 60s I'd expect something more classic styled than the one Krasinski had.
I don't think the "homework" angle was as big a factor as people are saying. it's not even the movie with the biggest amount of Disney+ setup this year. Even Guardians had some (though it was just a few mentions of Quill and Mantis being brother and sister)
Sony has a panel at CCXP which is leading everyone to think there's a big Spidey 4 announcement but...I don't think that's likely. For one, any date or anything would need to be sorted out with Disney since even though Sony sets the dates they still coordinate (which is why it's not a coincidence that every time a Spider-Man movie has gotten a release date all the MCU movies around that date get a bump), but it's also just pretty far out. CCXP usually covers stuff within the next year. At most maybe they'll officially announce that it's in development.
And yes my FF cast speculation is similarly far out from when CCXP is but at least with that it's still filming reportedly in weeks, which Spider-Man almost definitely is not.
People keep saying Invincible is like a satire or parody of superheroes and it...really isn't? Omni-Man also being secretly a bad guy doesn't make him like Homelander. Marks story is very much a traditional superhero type story and world, aside from the gore. Those aren't negatives, by the way. It's very different than say The Boys which is set in a world far more openly cynical about superheroes.
I glanced at the RT for this and the audience score is in the pits and...how? Does something ludicrous happen? Because going from the promo it's just a big budget Napoleon biopic
Especially since it's not like Deadpool wasn't corporate under Fox. Sure its more violent, sweary, and meta than most superhero movies, and a bit on the slimmer budget side, but it's still very much a blockbuster. Both movies have a climax of him teaming up with the X-Men.
I don't know what exactly you think is gonna be drastically different from Deadpool 2 to 3. The writers are the same as the first two, the actor is the same, most of the cast is returning, everyone involved with the production from literally the day they announced the Fox acquisition has said it's still going to be just as R rated as the last two.
I really don't think the idea that audiences hates supeheroes lines up with stuff like Guardians The Boys, Invincible, Gen V etc. Loki also was just very well received with its series finale. I think it's just more choosy.
Makes sense, especially since it sounds Oscar Isaac loved working on Moon Knight and him not coming back was the biggest obstacle to the character ever coming back.
I don't think the Spielberg rumors were ever really credible. Though why DC and WB never just cleared way to make Blackhawk, which he actually signed onto, happen is beyond mystifying
Mostly speculation on my end. Specifically at CCXP. If they're filming in January that's really the only place they can do a big cast announcement like Shakman said they were planning since they'll probably have wrapped principal photography by the time SDCC rolls around.