spazz91

A film doesn't need to win oscars (or film awards in general) to be marked as memorable.

I tend to like sequels much more than general audiencestransformersstar wars (the prequels)back to the futurematrixironmansupermanspidermanrandom others:ultravioletdaredevilgodzillajohn carterunstoppabletreasure of the sierra madre (can't even find other people that have seen this)it's actually pretty hard for me to NOT like a movie

Avengers - 5 timesDH1 & 2 - 3 timesbunch of movies - 2 timesmany movies - 1 timecountless movies - never

A third one would probably still do ok. They would need to make it more original (how I have no idea) if they wanted to continue it past a third one though.

I'm not even sure that at the current ticket price there's enough theaters to realistically get the 250M OW.Let's look at TA: $47,698 per theater average (4,349 theaters)4 shows in a screen per day (3hrs between showings in a theater)3 days$8 ticket price5 screens at each theater showing the movie$47,698 / (4 * 3 * 5 * $8) = ~99 people per viewing. That's a fairly tall order for an average viewing count. And to get to the 250M we'd need a 20% increase, putting us at 120 people per viewing of the movie.I have a feeling we will need to wait for either enough of an increase in ticket prices, or an increase in population substantial enough to require more theaters to be built.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_1976_box_office_number-one_films_in_the_United_Statesyou would be correct, unless you happened to be born in the last 2 days of may.

born in the Home Alone spree