boomboom234
-
Posts
4,748 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by boomboom234
-
-
Just now, AN9815 said:
Maybe this is an stupid question but does Disney now have total control on Fox 2018 movies? If that is the case I don't see how they will let 'Deadpool 2' open 1 week after 'Han Solo' and 2 weeks before 'Incredibles 2' which are likely to make +300M DOM
It will take at least a year to go through and be, hopefully, subject to DOJ regulators who can stop it, so until then fox is still its own thing
-
Hopefully the DOJ does its job
-
This is a bad deal for all of us, the murdoch's can expand their news empire and Disney becomes almost a monopoly
-
1 hour ago, 4815162342 said:
This won't have any connections to the PJ movies. Guaranteed.
It’s a prequel so they are not contesting the trilogy so may as well connect with one of the most beloved trilogies in history
-
This would be really stupid of them
-
2 hours ago, Cochofles said:
LOL
It's only gay when a mouth is doing the deed?
Yeah it's really weird Stephen king style
-
34 minutes ago, angeldelmito said:
stephen king just wrote about anything up in this here book huh
It was a handjob he gets offered head but Henry says he isn't into that gay stuff
-
2 hours ago, Stutterng baumer Denbrough said:
Of course not. But if they filmed it true to the novel it would.
I've heard once the release the sequel they will release a version cut like the book one movie like The Godfather special edition
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Rth TIFF said:
I hate clowns 🤡
Bye
PS
Molly's Game excellent
Call me by your name good
You'll float too
-
10 minutes ago, Cmasterclay said:
The Shining is the best adaptation of a King novel and probably the best horror movie ever made. Unbelievable. I love alot King novels but the one that pissed him off the most crushes other adaptations, sorry Stephen.
And now I notice Coolio made this point already but I already typed that and I'm too lazy to delete it and not have a point so.....+1
No Shawshank really?
-
2 minutes ago, Stutterng baumer Denbrough said:
I don't see any way that it reaches 100 million. This is going to be very front-loaded first of all. Second the hurricane is going to kill a lot of the Southern States movie business and third you have the NFL kicking off on Sunday which means 45 to 50% drops. 100 million is a tall task in my opinion.
It's not going to be that frontloaded this won't play like regular horror it's the dead pool of horror films it will do at least 90. The southern states won't make that big a difference in terms of gross maybe 4-5 million and while the NFL does start this isn't exactly a kid friendly matinee type picture
-
2 minutes ago, Stutterng baumer Denbrough said:
Well, I disagree. But I'm glad you liked it.
Thanks but they did show their imagination having an impact with the cattle gun if wasn't as good as the book but it was solid
-
3 minutes ago, Stutterng baumer Denbrough said:
And they left out the bird on Mike's end. They made Ben the city historian when it was Mike. Mike, as you said, in the book was very well developed. I have no idea why they made him so insignificant here. Also, they left out the mysticism. I mean, at the end, they just beat Pennywise with bats and chains. That makes no sense. In the book, they beat him with their wit, intelligence and because they are kids, they have child like minds. Eddie uses his placebo aspirator as battery acid. And so on. They missed the point of all of that.
They kinda showed that with the cattle gun it wasn't loaded but still damaged it. They did well enough showing they could only hurt it when they were no longer afraid of it and realized it was just reflecting their fears
-
It was really good I don't really watch horror but this movie was scary funny well acted a solid A
-
3 minutes ago, Jay Hollywood said:
He is right though, Cinema Sins is pointless.
Imagine if you made a movie and the title is EVERYTHING BAD about your movie. And the first two sins are. it Says South Pacific, and the first shot of a Kong movie is the sun? Thats 3 seconds into a 18 minute video.
They don't even watch the movies thats the issue he has. They flat out say WHY DOES THIS MOVIE TAKE PLACE in the 70s and why IS THERE AN ISLAND THEY ARE JUST FINDING NOW. I would be pissed too (however you guys are blowing his statements out of the water). They get character names wrong too.
First off they make it very clear how and its actually a true historical thing, oh and its also a king kong movie you fucks, you cant say finding an uncharted island is a Flaw.......
Thats not playful fun, its straight up just annoying and as a filmmaker the issue is they come off like people who doest actually understand the process of translating/making a movie work.
They are just jokes he adds sins for nothing it's just nitpicking for the fun of it, it's not real criticism. Complaints against come off as thin skinned and cry baby ish
-
6 minutes ago, Stutterng baumer Denbrough said:
Of the crossover in the adult part of IT?
Not here i cant. But if u want to go to thd spoiler thread i can post it there.
Yeah I don't remember
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Stutterng baumer Denbrough said:
There's always connection in Stephen King films or at least the books to other films. I can definitely confirm there is one massive connection between it and another property but it does not take place until the adult story. Every time I read it I giggle.
Could you remind me?
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, ACSlater said:
Uhh that is a fact...
MIT > Cambridge^n
Not really it's not even the best school in America's Cambridge
-
11 minutes ago, ACSlater said:
Oh my god I just overhead that Tony Stark must be stupid for attending MIT instead of Cambridge...
That English punk...Cambridge isn't even worthy to wipe MIT's ass...
Sure....
-
9 minutes ago, baumer said:
O12 is passable but 013 jumps the shark.
O13 is way better than 12
-
2
-
-
Just now, James said:
Thanks for the recommendations. I was actually looking for some summer reads on the subject
For Caesar Adrian Goldshworthy's book is pretty good or read Caesar own writings he's mostly fair on himself. FOr ALexander, my favorite, there is of course arrian JFC Fuller( really good), Robin Lane Fox, Theodore Dodge, NGL hammond, and Bosworth
-
8 minutes ago, James said:
I actually wanted to write the same Top 3! Those 3 are the Holy Trinity of war.
Gosh, I want some historical movies!
Supposesdly there will be an HBO adaption of Kubrick's unmade Napoleon Movie, but for reading I would recommend Andrew Roberts book on Napoleon, and if you can find it David Chandler's campaign's of napoleon
6 minutes ago, ACSlater said:Really showed his military "brilliance" through the Russia campaign.
An unfair point while indeed the Russia campaign was a failure that was more logistical than purely tactical. Nevertheless it was a failure hoever it does not take away from the brilliance of his Italy campaign or Austerlitz, Jena, his campaigns up to and after leipzig where he often won, except for leipzig, while being outnumbered 2-1 or even Waterloo where the battle was incredibly close at nearly impossible odds. Napoleon fought the enitirity of Europe often due to their attacks on him, while he did make mistakes he redefined warfare and defined an era of history
-
Napoleon is one of the greatest generals in history, third imo behind ALexander and Caesar, and an amazing politician and ruler. Further most of the wars he is associated with were declared on him by the British and other European monarchs scared of the French Revolution and Napoleon's regime
-
2
-
-
The last Thor movie did 85 had mediocre legs and wasn't well liked why would its sequel explode
Gosh, I want some historical movies!
Episode IV:A NEW MOUSE | DISNEY | IT IS DONE
in The Speakeasy
Posted
There’s a lot evil about Disney just this year bullying reporters and movie theater chains. This deal is bad for all of us but the mouse and the Murdoch’s