Jump to content

a2k

Free Account+
  • Posts

    22,318
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by a2k

  1. Going to repeat my post from yesterday, but the Hobbit movies have content from non-hobbit sources too, including LOTR appendices. So the studio was probably better off calling the movies LOTR and using 'hobbit' in the tag line. Eg: Lord of the Rings - A hobbit's tale, Lord of the Rings - Desolation of Smaug, etc. That could have retained a lot more of the LOTR audience.
  2. No way. Before Wb approach Peter, he will approach them to make TABA into a triology.
  3. DOS needs to get 65.67 to beat Narnia 1 / enter top 5 december weekends.
  4. The Variety has nothing on 'Classical film theory'...I am still gunning for 107 mill. 108 if it does not snow. Textbook stuff.
  5. Yeah, if 26 on fri translates to 62 for the weekend, 30 translates to 71.5
  6. DOS expected to gross, 26-30 over friday and 62-68 mil over the weekend Source : http://variety.com/2013/film/news/hobbit-desolation-of-smaug-lagging-behind-forecasts-with-less-than-70-million-1200953903/
  7. If it does 31 mil, it's 17.4% less than the first movie's friday (37.5). that would be an improvement over the day, as the midnights were off by 32%
  8. I think they should have continued calling the movies Lord of The Rings instead of the The Hobbit. It's not true technically and may sound stupid to some, but if the 3 Hobbit movies were called something like, Lord of the Rings - A Hobbit's Journey Lord of the Rings - The Hobbit and Smaug Lord of the Rings - There and back Again probably would have retained more of the audience that made LOTR 300+ million blockbusters without 3D tickets and inflation.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines. Feel free to read our Privacy Policy as well.