Yandereprime101189
-
Posts
2,859 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Annual Subscriptions
Media Demo
Posts posted by Yandereprime101189
-
-
4 minutes ago, Reddroast said:
Link?
Considering the source, It's really, REALLY not the most reliable, but I did want to bring it up.
-
On a few forums and message boards, Bryce Dallas Howard may be tapped to direct.
-
The funniest thing about the movie is that it nearly copies Dracula Untold beat by beat in some sequences and plot points.
It's even funnier when you realize both movies are written by the same people.
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Jason said:
Wait, what?Obviously an overstatement, but they have a lot.
-
Marvel has hundreds of thousands of unique heroes and villains they can make movies with that can be unique and different from other entries in the MCU canon. That's why it survives.
-
4
-
-
2 minutes ago, Spidey Freak said:
WB had credited Latinos for Suicide Squad success and turning up to support El Diablo in a public statement, so maybe Sony is not that crazy after all. El Muerto's majorly a star vehicle based on a character who might as well be original.
Somewhere I read that El Muerto basically appears in only like two comics.
I have a sinking feeling this movie may just.......be brushed under the rug.
-
I'd like to say, with the Bridemaids situation is that sometimes the score might not actually matter that much.
You would think a B-grade movie would still be considered good but apparently to many Cinemascore is like a strict parent
-
2 minutes ago, Mulder said:
EEAO is still very much the kind of weird stuff a lot of people would not be into in the GA imo. It's not arthouse but it has the kind of vibe of something like Psycho Goreman at points.
Basically this from what I've read or been told.
Though Psycho Goreman is more R-rated Power Rangers/Guyver
-
1
-
-
30 minutes ago, That One Guy said:
anyone who says this about fucking Everything Everywhere All at Once of all things has never seen an art film.
I don't necessarily personally believe it. A24 does tend to be more Indie darling than wide reaching audience pleasing films, but that's kinda changed with X which was basically one of the best pure slashers in years.
-
Well in the battle between multiverse movies, Doctor Strange obviously run financially and has the most eyes on it.
Lol, no hate on Everything Everywhere. I heard it's fantastic but it's too much of an art film for the GA.
-
1
-
-
Wanda makes a better Michael Myers/Slasher in this than Michael Myers was in Halloween Kills. I now really want to see a big-budget superslasher movie.
Also, Wanda's clearly not dead. Despite the castle falling on her, there is obvious red flash as it falls prety much implying she teleported.
-
It's an absolute thrill ride.
-
1
-
-
I want Dwayne Johnson to voice The Thing so bad.
-
The CGI looks fine as always, spectacular even and it'll probably be fun and a hit but I didn't really have much of a reaction to it. I did like the final notes hinting at "I see you" at the end though.
Theater was dead silent.
-
16 minutes ago, exomassey said:
The illuminati scene was a complete subvert expectations type thing but it worked for me.
Everyone says Marvel plays it safe but that Black Bolt death…was not expecting that lol
A subversion done horribly, delightfully right.
-
Damn, Kevin REALLY doesn't like Inhumans.
Also, Reed died like a bitch.
-
4 hours ago, Valonqar said:
who's complaining about Wanda screen time? No one.
Not here, Thank God, but when you go on other forums or Youtube comments, lol.
-
The complaint about there being too much Wanda doesn't make any sense when SHE'S THE ACTUAL VILLAIN OF THE MOVIE, so of course her screentime is gonna equal Strange's.
Also Agatha Harkness being terrified of her and warning Wanda "what have you done" at the end of Wandavision pretty much foreshadowed how absolutely nightmarishly powerful she is.
-
3
-
-
-
11 minutes ago, ImNotRacistAtAll said:
You sure...?
I wouldn't have posted that if I didn't.
Bumblebee was set in the late 80s with this one taking place several years later in the 90s and following the ending where Bumblebee reuinted with Optimus and the robot designs are supposed to be the same as they were in Bumblebee.
-
11 hours ago, Macleod said:
Can't understand why Paramount doesn't pursue a sequel. It's such a feel-good movie! The sequel could potentially double its box office. But they're probably too greedy -- they think Transformers should be a Billion-dollar grosser. Chris Pine has been trying to tell them that it's not what's needed for Trek, either, but oh well...
This is being described as the direct sequel to Bumblebee, so technically they are pursuing it.
-
So, this thread could be called Doctor Strange in the Thread With No Spoilers Whatsoever
-
1
-
-
At the date it's currently at, I don't think Oppenheimer is going to break the bank at the box office. Barbie and The Marvels are now likely going to eat it alive.
That said, I need more Goose.
-
4 hours ago, Poseidon said:
Still no explanation, how 20 runaway dinosaurs were able to cause any damage (they make it sound like humanity is close to extinction due to dinosaurs walking on earth) to humanity, while humanity was able to extinct thousands of species with...a spear thousands of years ago.
The most important question will still be, if they even try to offer an explanation.
Probably any genetics company can clone dinosaurs now after the disaster of Jurassic World and the auction.
May 13-15 Weekend Thread | 67.4% drop for Doctor Strange 2
in Numbers and Data
Posted
I mean, that Idris Elba lion movie could work as a day and date movie.
Regarding Firestarter