Cuaron is the first latino winner of Best Director, so it's not like they passed up a history-making winner for a white dude.
I also think with race issues so at the fore this year, the Academy will want the plaudits for making history again.
With the conclusion of Hunger Games in 2015, I now expect Disney will have the #1 movie every year for a good long time, barring another out-of-nowhere megahit like Avatar.
It's going to be Selma. The academy gets to make a statement and make history at the same time, and none of the other movies are strong enough to overrule that appeal. Boyhood is just too small and too unique for the Academy to embrace over it, and Birdman is slightly bigger but even more offbeat. All the other candidates are either too small or getting mixed reviews.
I can't see Boxtrolls getting nominated. Its reviews were mediocre at best, and even most of the positive reviews said it was the least of Laika's movies. Book of Life probably has a better chance.
With Lego and HTTYD2 both above 90% and Big Hero 6 almost there, I'd be surprised if they didn't all get nominated.
Dragons' TV series definitely wasn't bad enough to drive down any ticket sales. It's actually probably the best tie-in to an animated movie I've seen outside of Toy Story of Terror. The voices were the same, the animation was quality enough, and it had decent ongoing plots.
I still blame the drop on the fact that the sequel tried to grow with its audience a la Harry Potter, but the audience didn't come with it and the sequel was too mature for the new kids.
Given that this was a movie that had no business existing as it was adapted from the less interesting part of a book that could have easily been one movie, I imagine the producers and studio are still pretty happy. Glad to see the audience showing a bit of discretion when it comes to this format.
Given that Divergent is far from the franchise that this is, I wonder if those producers are rethinking their decision to piggyback on the trend by splitting the widely disliked final book.
The performance of both of these indicates that they're not mainstream phenomenons a la the big three, but rather semi-popular book franchises with a mostly fixed audience. I don't think the movies (especially Divergent, which was reviewed fairly poorly) brought in many fans who were not readers of the book.
With the exception of the first and second Twilight, YA franchises are fairly steady. I expect the same to happen with these two.
If it had opened in the post-Avengers era rather than as one of the first expansions of the MCU, it would have been.
If GOTG can do 94M, a 65M debut for Ant-Man will not thrill anyone. Still, the budget may be lower, so they'll probably still make some money off it. I just think this will likely be the lowest-grossing MCU film besides Incredible Hulk.
Minions is in there at 82M.
MI5 I see getting trampled by Star Wars.
Ant-Man. I think the buzz is fairly mixed and it opens to Thor numbers. First Marvel Studios disappointment, although hardly a bomb.
Star Wars Episode 7 - 217M
Avengers: Age of Ultron - 204M
Mockinjay Part II - 189M
Jurassic World - 114M
Fast Seven - 102M
The Peanuts Movie - 92M
Bond 24 - 89M
Minions - 82M
Inside Out - 76M
Tomorrowland - 72M (92M four-day)
Wild cards are The Jungle Book (probably #11), The Martian (Gravity 2.0?), The Good Dinosaur, Ted 2, 50 Shades of Grey, and Ant-Man
Star Wars has January/February to rack up more money, while Avengers kicks off an insanely crowded summer. I think that'll be the difference and Star Wars wins the year. At least domestically.